2089 posts shown.
Emily Fowler52 said:Since you aren't actually asking to have the partial removed, everything just stays exactly as it was.
Susan Price30 said:If that’s the moderator's call, then I guess we just have to live with it! I’ve always felt pretty strongly that most of the major, established religions here in America are fundamentally broken. Honestly, I can't help but feel a deep sense of skepticism toward them. So, if we're assuming that there’s no such thing as a neutral or open-minded stance from the get-go—meaning everything is already biased—then does that actually make it acceptable? Is it okay to just roll with it?
Susan Price30 said:And thirdly—how on earth does someone who’s openly anti-theist, or even actively involved in anti-religion organizations here in the States, end up moderating a subforum that's clearly dedicated to theistic questions? It just doesn't add up!
Susan Price30 said:And honestly, it’s probably even more pathetic when you realize that people like that end up... Lies. Just straight up lies. ....
Charles Fox10 said:Once you actually file a formal appeal regarding the penalty, you'll get your answer. ☕
I can't believe I'm even typing this out, but honestly, sometimes you just have to get it off your chest! It’s one of those days where everything feels slightly off, like when you realize you left your keys in the door after driving halfway to Chicago, you know? Just that sudden, sinking feeling in your gut. Anyway, I was sitting there thinking about how much life can change in an instant, and I just felt this overwhelming need to share some thoughts with you all. It's been a bit of a whirlwind lately, and I feel like I've been running on caffeine and sheer willpower more than actual sleep! Does anyone else ever feel like they're just perpetually playing catch-up with their own lives? It's exhausting, but we're all in this together, right? Sending good vibes to everyone who's having one of those "what am I doing with my life" kind of afternoons! kaže:
Since this subforum is titled "Messages and Appeals," I honestly think we should probably clarify what goes where! It feels like things might get a little messy if we don't set some ground rules early on. Personally, I’ve always felt that having a clear distinction between a casual chat and an official request makes everything run so much smoother for everyone involved. What do you all think? Should we tighten up the guidelines so people know exactly when they're just venting versus when they're actually filing a formal grievance? I'm curious to hear your thoughts on how we can keep this organized! I haven't seen any comments yet! It looks like the thread is still empty. Once people start chiming in, I'll be right here ready to dive into the discussion and see what everyone thinks. Please, don't be shy—get the conversation started!"
I can't believe I'm even seeing this on my feed right now! Honestly, it’s just one of those things that makes you stop scrolling and go, "Are you kidding me?" It really feels like we're living through some kind of bizarre fever dream lately where nothing quite adds up, does it? I mean, don't get me wrong, I love a good bit of chaos, but there's a limit to how much absurdity one person can take before they start questioning their own sanity! It’s just wild. Just absolutely wild. kaže:
I honestly thought it would be perfectly fine for me to chime in regarding the moderation here—you know, just pointing out if things seem a bit off, maybe a little excessive, or just plain weird. My intention was really just to keep everyone else in the loop about what’s actually going down and see if anyone else was noticing these same patterns. I figured it might be helpful to check if there were other instances where things felt out of line.
I can't believe I'm even seeing this here, but honestly, some things never change, right? It feels like every time I log on, there's someone trying to stir the pot or just being plain old difficult for the sake of it. It’s one of those days where you just want to sit back with a coffee and ignore the noise, but then you see posts like this and realize you can't exactly escape the chaos! kaže:
If there's anyone around, I was thinking it might actually be worth having a real conversation about them—and maybe even taking some actual steps to make sure they don't become an issue.
Rachel Jones8 said:Alright, let's wrap this one up and close the thread.
swifttiger75 said:Pred Sepin On the ranch, almost everyone had a target in their sights. Except... 4seasona Someone tried to de-escalate the situation—failed miserably. Everyone else just sat there spinning through every possible scenario, hunting for the best target. Well... Brilliant. He was busy thinking about naked women, but he wasn't exactly armed anyway. Then it happened. Pat Suddenly she sneezed, huh? Sep He instinctively cocked the shotgun and chambered a shell. Mirko Who actually tried to ride a horse like that?
coastaldrifter6 He pulled his gun, ran the tip of his palm over it, and chambered a few rounds. Sepin Stomach. SukKin The horse jumped—so what? Jim Clark He hit the mark, but he ended up taking himself out instead. I don't know what you want from me—just leave it at that. Sent him off with a shot—straight to the eternal hunting grounds. Nathan Jones98 He really pushed it toward— I don't know what you're trying to get at with that—just leave it alone.Hitting him right in the neck. I don't know what to tell you—it just sucks. She took a shot at... 4seasonu The bullet stopped halfway through the Bible—which basically meant... Nathan Jones98 Time to take good aim and hit a young gunslinger. coastaldrifter6 It’s finished. Sep With two rounds just as he was getting himself up, only to find himself staring down... Nathan Jones98With guns drawn, the duo sat perched on their horses—balancing themselves with one hand against the restless animals while aiming at their opponent with the other.
Here we go, guys.Nathan Jones98 and coastaldrifter6So, you’ve got some breathing room—enough to hash things out here in the dust and figure out the next move. I'll stick to whatever we decide... hopefully. You have until the deadline to reach an agreement. Pat Not again. Seriously—whenever that "Apache" nonsense starts popping up out of nowhere, whether it's from someone else or coming from my side... Patina You can take your shots, but not before I do. Here's how it works: you type "bang!" in your post. Whoever posts immediately after the "Apache" is the one who hit the other.
During that time in the camp. Edward Howard2 He was just complaining about... rustydrifter10He slipped up on the latest issue of Motorsport—ended up face-first in the dirt. TBF He brushed the dust off his sleeves—just a quick motion—and looked over. traxdatu7 who was standing right next to him, holding that Tomahawk, TBF He slowly started listing the reasons why he was... Sebastian Vettel Best driver out there today.
He threw everything at the wall—every statistical data point imaginable, plus some astrological nonsense. Of course, he had to throw in a comparison, too. Vettel-Alonso Which one did he further personalize with a clear personal stance toward— AlonsoIt wasn't meant to be insulting—far from it. It was actually pretty affirmative, even if the whole point was to frame things in an affirmative way regarding... Alonso Basically, I just forced my opponent to realize exactly how it feels. Sebastian Vettel Still better. rustycobra32 And they were just sitting there watching how... traxdata7 He can't even get a word in edgewise. But when he does— TBF I’ve started working on an extensive analysis regarding the life and work of the young guy. VettelStarting from my earliest childhood— traxdata7 He went down on his knees—blood spraying from his nose. What really finished him off was how blatantly they positioned the fact that... Mark Webber i Sebastian Vettel They’re driving the exact same cars anyway. Just stating the facts. traxdata7 He went face-first into the dirt. rustycobra32 He rode up on us, approaching on horseback. TBFPointing toward the ridge, a few of the Apache sent him off for... I can't work with just a username. Give me some actual text to rewrite.. Tyler Bennett5 I'm ready. Send over the posts you need me to rework. I'll handle the substitutions and keep the tone exactly where it needs to be—blunt, terse, and strictly American. Paska They've already pulled way ahead—honestly. Megan Jones3 He walked out of the Wigwam clutching his head.
It continues...
stormybadger8 said:I thought it might take a little more convincing to get you guys on board...🤣
It’s honestly easier to talk you guys into chasing after Fernando Alonso than it is to convince the Sheriff to get the Lady from Bordeaux a cookie. 😬🙏🤣
Anthony Ross2 said:Alright, then—just give me the longest temporary ban possible, please. I fully understand the rules.
Drew Bennett68 said:This might honestly be the best thing ever written on this entire forum.
I mean, who’s going to be the first one to add this to their signature? Actually, if you ask me, it really should be mandatory.
Jonathan Ortiz2 said:Well, others aren't getting hurt either... specifically the people actually participating in incest.The simple fact that incestuous relationships are proven to result in children with serious health issues is more than enough reason to keep it illegal, and honestly, the legal framework surrounding those kids is another reason why these things shouldn't be compared. Sure, some (incestuous) couples might decide not to have kids, but having children isn't a requirement for marriage, nor is the absence of them a reason to skip it. The law doesn't just pick and choose based on whether someone plans to procreate or not, so you can't exactly argue that incest should be okay just because the couple decides not to reproduce. Besides, people change their minds or end up with an unplanned pregnancy all the time.
True enough... but you guys are basically "defending" marriage by trying to protect the rights of someone who hasn't even been born yet. I'm not even sure you can technically call that a right.
Besides, you even said yourself that sex isn't a prerequisite for marriage. You don't even need to have a desire for kids. So, theoretically speaking, what those two (brother and sister) are doing doesn't matter because whatever happens is their business anyway, it's not a requirement for marriage.
So the real question is, why would the government even bother banning them from getting married then?
Sophia Smith29 said:There’s this one relatively useless sticky thread on that subforum that doesn't actually add anything to the quality or the traffic of the board—it’s basically just there because of some old tradition.
William Bennett53 said:...
James Patel20 said:There really is a massive pile of unwritten rules scattered across various sub-forums and specific threads, even if they aren't explicitly laid out anywhere except maybe within an individual discussion topic itself.