I just wanted to jump in and share my two cents on this whole situation. 🙂
gentlehound9 said:Fine, I’ll wrap this up with one final thought.
The FBI isn't some niche sub-forum that requires deep empathy or complex understanding. Anyone can moderate it because anyone can judge whether a post belongs there or not. If you can't recognize Garbage when you see it, you shouldn't be making those calls.
I realize that sub-moderators are picked by the current moderators, but in this specific instance, the current mods aren't exactly pulling their weight. So, who are they actually going to pick? Someone to actually do the heavy lifting, or just another person who—much like them—will end up doing absolutely nothing?
Honestly, the admins should just make the call on any potential sub-mod.
That's enough from me on this topic. Carry on with your arguing or keep boiling over; I couldn't care less.
Honestly, the FBI section is such an incredibly delicate area that you absolutely cannot just let "anyone" handle it; you have to be extremely careful about who you pick. We’re talking about people coming there whose lives are being torn apart—people dealing with broken families, victims of violence, parents losing their children, and individuals facing total physical and mental collapse who are just drowning in everything happening to them. On top of that, you have all the other users—bitter, disappointed, hurt, miserable, angry, aggressive, or terrified people... the entire spectrum of human emotion is right there on the forum.
I really don't think I should even have to emphasize how sensitive this space is, or how much empathy, patience, thoughtfulness, genuine willpower, and love for the FBI section 😍 it takes to actually tackle the role and give it your absolute all when moderating.
I'm sorry, but that comment doesn't just miss the mark—it’s so disconnected from reality that I genuinely wonder if you even realize what you just wrote. 😕
Being a Moderator is about so much more than just moving threads around, locking posts, deleting things, issuing warnings, banning people, or typing out posts in your favorite color—at least not on my 😳 subreddit.
For every single sub, including Reddit, we choose moderators who are the most suitable fit for that specific community at that specific moment in time.
I know the Moderators suggest co-moderators, but in this case, the current Mods aren't really performing their duties well, so what kind of co-moderators would they even pick?
Simplicity and Kowalski aren't bad moderators; it's just that both of them are going through massive life changes right now and haven't quite found their rhythm balancing those with moderation duties yet. At least, that's my personal take. I don't think they're unfit for the job just because temporary life events keep them away from the screen most of the time; they're just still trying to juggle their new responsibilities with their old ones.
If they realize (or have already realized) that they need help, they will ask for it (or already have).
Otherwise, Paul Green31 hit the nail on the head regarding what Reddit needs. It's probably best if the Admins make the final call on any potential co-moderator.
New moderators are chosen by the Admins based on suggestions from the existing Moderators of that specific sub, but the final decision always rests with Anderson.