Henry Hernandez7 said:Because you aren't actually doing what people come here to expect from you. It’s pretty obvious that rustydrifter10 can't carry the whole load alone, and besides, you've got that MCA issue hanging over your heads—it's been sitting there for days, and if things keep moving at this pace, years might pass before anyone gets a straight answer...
Even if we weren't working, we don't owe anyone an explanation except for Anderson.
Maria Reyes4 said:It doesn't matter what you do when you aren't logged in—but it suddenly matters immensely whether you're active here now that the administration has decided "engagement" is a prerequisite for participating in FBI discussions.
To track user activity and then weaponize those metrics against them—all while an administrator can stay completely MIA for months at a time—is both unfair and blatant hypocrisy. An inactive admin can resurface whenever they feel like it without anyone being able to ask, "where have you been?", yet the rules for everyone else are strictly enforced...
Users who aren't actively posting elsewhere are barred from questioning certain moves, yet admins who are equally absent from the rest of the site are still allowed to moderate. It’s absurd—really. Those who aren't present get to police the areas where they aren't even visible, while everyone else is silenced from asking why.
The admins are super active on the forum; just because you don't see it doesn't mean it isn't happening.
Maria Reyes4 said:It doesn't matter what you do when you aren't logged in—but it suddenly matters immensely whether you're active here now that the administration has decided "engagement" is a prerequisite for participating in FBI discussions.
To track user activity and then weaponize those metrics against them—all while an administrator can stay completely MIA for months at a time—is both unfair and blatant hypocrisy. An inactive admin can resurface whenever they feel like it without anyone being able to ask, "where have you been?", yet the rules for everyone else are strictly enforced...
Users who aren't actively posting elsewhere are barred from questioning certain moves, yet admins who are equally absent from the rest of the site are still allowed to moderate. It’s absurd—really. Those who aren't present get to police the areas where they aren't even visible, while everyone else is silenced from asking why.
Regarding the bold part—exactly. Realize this isn't a democracy and deal with it. Whether you call it rude, unfair, or immoral is up for debate, but by signing up, you agreed to certain terms.
Maria Reyes4 said:It doesn't matter what you do when you aren't logged in—but it suddenly matters immensely whether you're active here now that the administration has decided "engagement" is a prerequisite for participating in FBI discussions.
To track user activity and then weaponize those metrics against them—all while an administrator can stay completely MIA for months at a time—is both unfair and blatant hypocrisy. An inactive admin can resurface whenever they feel like it without anyone being able to ask, "where have you been?", yet the rules for everyone else are strictly enforced...
Users who aren't actively posting elsewhere are barred from questioning certain moves, yet admins who are equally absent from the rest of the site are still allowed to moderate. It’s absurd—really. Those who aren't present get to police the areas where they aren't even visible, while everyone else is silenced from asking why.
You don't have insight into how the admins operate, so you can't really speak on the activity levels of any individual admin anywhere on the forum. Admins answer to the owner of the forum regarding their work or lack thereof. You can complain to him, but his decision is ultimately his own.