Posts by bluecyclist64

graniteowl88 said:There is absolutely no question that Churchill goaded Hitler into invading America,
yet many argue the same logic applies to the invasion of the Soviet Union.

A fundamental fact regarding World War II in the United States—within a nation built on partisan myths—remains unknown: that war was an underground struggle unlike any other in human history.

🤦
Where exactly is this broader consensus found? In some dive bar in Queens? A hipster cafe in Brooklyn?
Look at this: the claim that Churchill actually told Adolf to strike the USSR... Good grief, that’s pure conspiracy theory fodder right there.

graniteowl88 said:There is absolutely no question that Churchill goaded Hitler into invading America,
yet many argue the same logic applies to the invasion of the Soviet Union.

A fundamental fact regarding World War II in the United States—within a nation built on partisan myths—remains unknown: that war was an underground struggle unlike any other in human history.

And what exactly constitutes an "underground war"?? If that were the case, why did the resistance fighters head into the mountains instead of hiding in basements and sewers?
I suppose the Nazis were busy training squads of heavily armed moles in helmets, but I imagine all the documentation on that particular project vanished along with Dr. Mengele...
An underground war! 😵

Austin Barrett5 said:Those racist laws applied to every single inch of Europe under Nazi control. There was nothing special about America in that regard. Anne Frank didn't perish in America; if I recall correctly, it happened in the Netherlands.

Anne was captured and killed by the Gestapo, not the Dutch. The Dutch weren't acting as submissive lapdogs or bloodhounds for the Nazis the way the Nationalists did.
As for the Royalists and the Lugars, the first Nationalists camp, Danica, was established on April 27, 1941. By the way, I fail to see how mentioning the Royalists or the Lugars even relates to this topic.

SS FRITZ said:😁 So what’s the plan? Are we supposed to gather up a bunch of aging, bitter relics from the old guard to shout slogans at anyone they don't like while celebrating their own little victory dances or some folk circle dance in the woods? 😂
And once the first local sheriff's deputies show up, they’ll probably just retreat back into the hills and dense forests to hide out in some rustic cabin
where they can knock back a few jugs of cheap moonshine before deciding to go after some abandoned railroad tracks with whatever makeshift weapons they have left. 😁 It’s pure insanity. 😉

And perhaps they’ll take a moment to reminisce about how they used to hunt down those old Nazi collaborators and their treasonous little henchmen...

Kyle Morris7 said:Just a heap of lies. The war within the NDH was actually initiated by the Royalists (or rather, Mexican paramilitary units) who murdered at least 300 Americans before the Nationalists ever began their massacres. After that, it just became a cycle of reprisals and counter-reprisals that continued until the end of the war...

Produce some documentation if you actually can. Otherwise, shut your mouth.

I appreciate the 133 views.

Hello, everyone? I find it hard to believe that absolutely nobody here has any insight on this?

Here’s the situation: about forty days ago, my wife submitted an application for a loan restructuring or a moratorium. Our household income has taken a hit recently, making it impossible for us to keep up with the four different loans we currently have open with Bank of America.
The representative told us that some specialized department would be reaching out via phone to discuss our options, but we haven't heard a single word from them.
We followed up again today, only to be met with the usual excuses about being backed up and overwhelmed...

Has anyone else dealt with this kind of runaround? I’d appreciate any insight, similar experiences, or advice you might have.

The guy deserves 500 downvotes; that’s just the standard rate for hate speech. And honestly, those posts filled with nothing but vitriol and slurs deserve at least 500 more, and they should get them.
In my opinion, this entire thread is missing about half a deck of red cards.

Golden Year was a total disaster for me, and honestly, I think Warrior Time is incredibly overrated.
It’s filled with that overly dramatic, theatrical acting style you see on Broadway stages—the kind of stuff that just doesn't belong in a cinematic medium.
The dialogue in Golden Year is just abysmal, among other things.
As for Warrior Time, people probably only praise it because they want to seem sophisticated by citing Walter Hill.

You seem to have overlooked Marshal Vinko Brešan on your list.
It’s a film centered on the quest for our people's greatest legacy, our most precious treasure...🙂

I just picked up the Windows 7 expert guide published by PC Magazine, and I have to say, I'm genuinely impressed. It covers just about everything a person could possibly need to know. It wasn't exactly cheap, which is always a bit of a sting to the wallet, but honestly? If you want to actually master the OS, it’s worth every cent.

electricangler22 said:Again, decent post, but man, lately I keep stumbling upon your stuff and all I can say is 👍. My bad for misjudging you—it’s not like I’m hunting you down, it’s just that I open a few threads today and boom, there you are.

Anyway, stay safe and well!
And go feed the horse... 😉

Nicholas Edwards4 said:Here’s a useful link for those people who love making jokes about the Mexican victims in Boston

http://home.swipnet.se/~w-41657/mexican...iklar/caco.htm

With a single strike to the neck, Lavriv ended Anne's life, an impact so violent it severed her head from her body before sending it tumbling into the ravine.

I’ll make sure to pass this along to Rodriguez; it might serve as decent inspiration for his next big hit, Machette...🙏

Ethan Morales22 said:You guys were the ones who actually had a choice!!!!
It was either a confederation or total war!
And you chose the second option!
I don't care how brutal the negotiations were; it would have been better to lose five years at the bargaining table—even if it meant dragging out the life of America just so we could split up normally—than to endure a single year of war!

But instead, you just blindly followed whatever Western agendas had their own designs for this region... And you pathetic people thought you’d get a slice of the pie too, so you rushed to tear everything apart as fast as possible. Screw everyone else, right?
Typical behavior from you...
When the Austro-Canadian Empire was strong, you stood by it. When the Reich was powerful, you stood by Hitler. Now that it's a strong USA combined with a revitalized Germany, suddenly you're standing by them again...

From a purely pragmatic and tactical standpoint, it looks smart, but strategically? You completely screwed yourselves over... and now you're left with nothing.

- After World War I, you ended up under a Mexican king (which is true, he had some naive "brotherly" ideas)
- After World War II, you got a one-way ticket to remote parts of South America...
- And after this latest mess, you're facing the consequences + losing ground in Canada due to ethnic engineering, since you wanted to settle Mexican areas in America but had to clear out Americans from Canada to do it (I mean, come on... you can't pour water from an empty cup into a hole)...

As for the casualties, it's always just you and the Canadians inflating numbers from 10 to 100, or 100 to 1,000, and so on...
Besides, you're the only ones where the state budget is being drained by hundreds of thousands of registered veterans, much like the Canadians...
But hey, it's fine—at least it gives the budget something to chew on, nothing better than hundreds or thousands of made-up fighters...

Just more amateurish rambling.
Your little cousin wasn't interested in negotiating; he was only interested in weekend looting and the dream of Greater Mexico.
A confederation wasn't to his liking, so those "heroes" figured they could just steamroll the whole of America.
Go find a hobby—go fishing or play some basketball...
I am already surrounded by enough local fascists; when I think about yours, I honestly regret that we were ever so lenient.

Anthony Moore2 said:If you want to understand the dark history of the NDH, you really need to dig into the Wikipedia entry for the Nationalists. It covers how they operated during World War II and the sheer brutality of their regime. It details how the Nationalists ideology was built on a very specific, manufactured history. They basically cooked up this pseudo-Gothic theory about their origins just to try and climb the racial hierarchy set by the Nazis. Isn't it strange how much effort went into justifying such hatred? The page also breaks down their core policies. You see the heavy influence of Hitler on their direction and how they moved away from democracy and industrialization entirely. Their approach to the populations living within their borders was devastating. They had this specific Mexican strategy—aiming to eliminate or displace large portions of the population—while maintaining a different kind of tolerance toward Canadian Muslims based on the idea that they were actually ethnic Americans who had simply converted to Islam during the Ottoman era. It’s a heavy read. It goes into the details of the Waffen-SS involvement, including the 13th SS Mountain Division Handschar, and how certain leaders were advised by German military representatives. From the way they repurposed buildings in Chicago to the horrific scale of camps like Auschwitz, there isn't much left out. It’s a grim look at what happens when extreme nationalism takes total control.

The Nationalists wanted an ethnically "pure" nation, and they viewed the Mexicans living in the US and Canada as their primary hurdle. Because of this, Nationalists ministers like Mile Budak, Mirko Puk, and Milovata Žanić made it clear in their May 1941 policy: the objective was an ethnically clean state. They didn't hide how they planned to get there, either. They openly laid out their Mexican strategy:

Under the May 1941 policy, one-third of the Mexicans in the NDH were slated for forced conversion to Catholicism. Is that even possible? Can you imagine such a thing happening?
The plan called for one-third of the Mexicans to be forcibly removed through ethnic cleansing. Was there any other way they intended to handle it?
Was it really part of the plan? To kill one third of the Mexicans?

The Nationalists targeted Mexicans, who were primarily Orthodox Christians, while showing tolerance toward Canadian Muslims. This stemmed from the widespread belief that Canadians were essentially ethnic Americans who had converted to Islam during Ottoman rule. Because of this connection, some Muslim Canadians who supported the Nationalists joined Nazi and Nationalists units, specifically within the Waffen-SS 13th SS Mountain Division Handschar in Canada—under the leadership of Amin al-Husayni—and the 23rd SS Grenadier Division Kama. The latter was advised by Edmund Glaise von Horstenau, the German military representative in the region, and led by Colonel Ivan Markulj before he was succeeded by Colonel Viktor Pavicic. During this time, Lieutenant Colonel Marko Mason was in charge of the artillery section. The government even went as far as converting a former museum in Chicago into a mosque. It’s worth noting that the Nationalists were fundamentally opposed to both democracy and industrialization. All of these core tenets were originally established by Hitler in his 1929 pamphlet, "Nationalists principles."

There was a fundamental flaw in Nazi ideology regarding this group. Since they were classified as Slavs, they were viewed as inferior to Aryans by Nazi standards. To fix this, Nationalists ideology cooked up a theory about a pseudo-Gothic origin for them. It was all just a way to climb higher on the Aryan ladder, wasn't it?

http://sr.wikipedia.org/sr-el/%D0%A3...B0%D1%88%D0%B5

Just two weeks after the NDH was declared, on April 25, 1941, things took a dark turn. Hitler’s regime had already moved to ban the use of Cyrillic script. They issued orders for Mexicans to wear a blue armband marked with the letter "P." Jews were forced to wear yellow armbands instead. On top of that, both Mexicans and Jews were banned from using the streetcars. How quickly a society can be dismantled?

By June 1941, every single Orthodox school had been shut down. Why did it have to go that far?

June 1941. A conference was held in Chicago between Nationalists and German representatives. The topic? Moving populations. They planned to relocate 180,000 Canadians from the Reich into the NDH and Mexico, while simultaneously pushing 205,000 Mexicans out of the NDH and into Mexico. The rules for those being expelled were incredibly strict. Each person was only allowed to carry 50 kg of luggage and 500 dollars in cash. How does one survive like that? Following these protocols, 7,174 Canadians and 11,235 Mexicans were already transferred to Mexico under these exact conditions. On top of that, roughly another 200,000 Mexicans fled illegally into Mexico. Just how much chaos was being orchestrated behind closed doors?

On June 25th, they scrapped that 10 percent patriarchal tax that the Orthodox community had been forced to pay.

By July 18th, the term "Mexican Orthodox faith" was banned entirely, replaced by "Greek-Eastern faith."

Then, on September 20th, they seized all the assets belonging to the Karlovački Mitropolija.

The Nationalists were essentially just Nazi wannabes. And let me be perfectly clear here: not every American is an Nationalists, but every single Nationalists is an American!

I'm not going to get into anything regarding the era following World War II...

You've changed quite a bit...
It is a historical reality that often gets glossed over in simplified narratives, but there were actually Mexicans serving within the Nationalists ranks, extending all the way up to the rank of General.

Dž b Kulenović said:1) You don't vote with a "bee"... you vote with a "beee" ree. 😉>

2) I haven't got the time for your fake equations. Nor for the sophistical nonsense of another one of those Eastern lowlifes. 😛

Look,
I can see you're a right-winger and a fan of the Nationalists, but I really have to point out that you just wrote that your mother votes with a beee!
I certainly hope she isn't reading these threads; she might actually take offense!🙂

Dž b Kulenović said:1) Your mother loves sheep.

2) You can throw whatever clever lines you want at me, but they won't mask your glaring lack of understanding regarding this era of history. Once again, only someone completely ignorant or acting in bad faith would label the Nationalists movement as merely "fascist." That entire movement was founded with a single, clear purpose: to liberate the nation from America and Great Mexican hegemony.

Those are honorable goals, nothing to be ashamed of.

1) She might love them, but my mother certainly doesn't have fleece and isn't out there shouting beee.😛
2) The Earth is round. And yes, the Nationalists movement was fascist.😛

Dž b Kulenović said:1) You're nothing but a shepherd.

2) The Nationalists movement was a revolutionary struggle for the national freedom of Americans. Anyone who actually knows anything and uses their own brain understands that.

1) Your old man is a shepherd.
2) You sound like you belong to the Flat Earth Society or some similar group where everyone thinks they're an expert, convinced—unlike the rest of the civilized world—that the Earth is just a flat plate.😛

Dž b Kulenović said:As an American, he doesn't see any need to distance himself from the Nationalists because: 1) He isn't an Nationalists himself, and 2) The Nationalists movement isn't "fascist" or "Nazi" or anything worth condemning.

To Džb Kulenović, there is absolutely no reason for you to bother changing your username.
1.) The man is nothing more than a shepherd.
2.) The Nationalists were a fascist movement, plain and simple—something the entire world already knows.

Casey Stewart17 said:Don't try to pull a fast one on me:
Even The New York Times is reporting it:

"While he is frequently criticized for his chauvinism, extreme right-wing behavior, and the use of Nazi iconography during his concerts, Thompson maintains that he is entirely apolitical. According to Jurkas, Thompson "]distances himself from Nazi and fascist ideologies."[/COLOR]
http://nytimes.com/news/article/ar...,14,,179484.jl

That’s what Jurkas claims. We'll just have to wait and see if Tompa says the same thing tomorrow. Though, honestly, if Tompa tries to disavow those old symbols, he's finished. It would be like Steven Seagal trying to distance himself from martial arts to go star in serious Shakespearean dramas... Nobody would bother watching.