Posts by mistyseal11

It’s not a threat 🙂
I really ought to be studying, but I just can't bring myself to log off and stop posting here.

edit: actually, I was just messing around 😍 there are a few PDFs on this forum that might actually help me out.
So, yeah, when I really think about it, I don't need to stay.
I just need to learn some self-control.

lock.

🤦

Look, I really don't want to be that guy who gets out of line by being vulgar, doxxing someone's number, pushing some sketchy get-rich-quick scheme, or spreading hate speech.
So, honestly, I’m just asking for a quick 20 or 30-day timeout to clear my head.

🙂

thanks

hey there,

can someone give me a hand with reading these lab results?

when a bacteria test says "isolated," what does that actually mean versus when it says "not isolated"?

also, what’s the deal with the "S" in the column for a bacterium that WAS isolated, compared to the ones that don't have any special notes about being isolated?

and why on earth do they write certain things in bold in the notes section with a bunch of exclamation points just to say something WASN'T isolated?

I’m looking to get a full-blown, top-to-bottom checkup done.
Basically, I want someone to scan me from head to toe.

There’s a whole list of things I’m worried about (maybe I'm just being a hypochondriac, but honestly, these symptoms feel pretty real)

First off—my digestive system (all those organs) and my lungs.

Since I’ve never actually done this before, does anyone know what kind of damage I'm looking at price-wise, and do you have any solid recommendations?

thanks

So, like, what if you just pulled the hard drive out and formatted it using a different machine?

Yo, you still got that disc that came with your rig?

Man, I actually still have that Snow Leopard DVD lying around—it came right in the box with my laptop.
That late 2009 unibody model? Honestly, it’s still such a beast.

So, what kind of laptop is she rocking?

Jonathan Mendoza17 said:This feels like one of those highly specific problems that gets hashed out during a live lecture—where everyone just intuitively "gets" what the instructor wants—but looking at it purely on paper, I’m completely lost.
I mean, how did you all determine that we're actually looking for the host address range? Or even more fundamentally, what is the expected format for the final answer?
To me, this looks like someone just handed us a set of variables like a=5 and b=7 without telling us if we need to solve for c, x, y, or z. You guys probably have some extra context from listening to similar lectures that makes this make sense, but I'm flying blind here.

Yeah, just realized—I've got 20 hosts on the POnetwork
here.
So, how many subnets am I actually looking at making?
Every single one's gotta have a /27 mask (255.255.255.224),

Here's the breakdown for the second subnet:

209.50.1.32 -> network address
209.50.1.33 - 209.50.1.62 -> host addresses
209.50.1.63 -> broadcast

Wait, are you looking for the answer to question 7 or number 8?

With 20 hosts, you're basically hunting for the first power of two that "covers" that number => 2^5 which equals 32 (that'll do the trick)
Since the mask is 32 bits total... the subnet mask ends up being 32 minus 5 which gives you a /27 -just a little hint there

So basically
209.50.1.0 => that's your network address
209.50.1.1 through 209.50.1.30 => those are all the usable IP addresses for your hosts
209.50.1.31 => and that's your broadcast address

Michelle Evans said:mistyseal11, sorry it took me forever to get back to you!

man, seriously
it's all good

Michelle Evans said:I'll reply in a few hours once I'm back online.

🙂

I know they locked it because some users were getting way too hyped up over the whole topic.

If I recall correctly, there was actually some solid stuff being said in there, though I can't quite remember what the actual posts were about.

Wait, the thread is gone entirely...!? 🤷

What was the actual reason for deleting it? I get why you'd lock a thread, but straight-up deleting it is a different story.

Thanks for clearing that up. 🕺

Harold Torres71 said:Man, we seriously need to expand on this. 😁

honestly, I'm not even sure if this thing is actually working right
🤷

https://goo.gl/tg509Y ----> just drop your handle... and quit acting like such a poser. 🙂

if your handle is just a regular word -> "handle says" -> yeah, use the quotes

it’s all so predictable

hint: The Secret

I actually went through this exact thing with music while I was meditating—basically just trying to purge all the absolute garbage from my head.

The first day, it was some kind of synth-pop track playing on the keys

then the second day, it was nothing but drums

...and by the third day, it was full-on jet engines and sirens...

Based on an N=1 sample size here, I’d say you’re probably purging some leaky faucets from your subconscious too, Dennis Hall41.

Sandra Rodriguez said:Newsflash: advanced Google searches and old-school stalking are working just fine. ☕ 😁

Total buzzkill.

Besides, you're basically just proving that having this option on the forum is totally useless anyway.
If someone wants to stalk, they'll find a way to do it. If they don't know how—well, they're just stuck in the dark ages.😬

you guys are just straight-up stalkers.

rabbit, you seriously gross me out.

morning, gotta go hunt down some more bandwidth and resources😁

actually, things are even better without the search function. nobody can be stalking me now

up your ass!! 😁 hahahahahah

Honestly, I’d totally jump on board, it's just that kind of thing is way outside my comfort zone 🙂

It’s even worse when you get caught in that loop: "I've got something new, but man, it feels wrong to just toss the old stuff."

That’s when honestly it really hurts.

Is that happening today?
...for real?

Solid advice on getting out there and volunteering!

Let's get to work ~ Miki