slymoose4 said:I knew I’d provoke you. Yeah, I felt called out because I mentioned earlier that I didn't get cancer.
In my view, a 90% success rate is an absolutely stellar result. Honestly, even hitting 50% would be considered outstanding these days, especially when you consider that most researchers and medical institutions aren't even seeing those kinds of numbers despite dumping billions of dollars into R&D and clinical treatments.
It feels like the price tag for progress and industrialization was way too steep. We’re paying for it with this wave of brand-new diseases—even if we did manage to settle some scores with the old ones—not to mention the massive pollution we're dumping on future generations and that constant, looming threat of global warming everyone keeps talking about.
We really need to take a breather and stop obsessing over nothing but the bottom line. It’s time to pump the brakes on this constant pursuit of profit and actually start sharing the world's wealth with those who have nothing.
When it comes to swallowing, I wouldn't recommend it to anyone if they actually care about their health—unless, of course, you want to start chewing every single bite of food at least ten times before letting it go down.
Hey there,
slymoose4, thanks again for your generosity in sharing information about this treatment method. At the same time, I need you to understand the skepticism coming from people who are being hit directly and incredibly hard by cancer. It’s not just once or twice that they've had close encounters with all sorts of so-called "methods" that did nothing but torture their loved ones, offering false hope while delivering zero results. In my opinion, it wasn't the actual method you presented that provoked Betty Allen65, but rather the way you framed it: "my people, I can't believe you don't know about this yet." It felt like someone was patronizing us, implying we’re stupid or blind. Every single one of us here has been doing—and continues to do—everything humanly possible to help our loved ones through things most people couldn't even imagine, let alone without diving into deep literature and consulting with specialists all over the world, not just locally.
Una is a woman who recently lost her beloved child, so can you even begin to fathom how soul-crushing and devastating it would be for her if she discovered that what you’re presenting as a cure was actually within her reach all along? Imagine the agony of knowing that if she had only known about this, she might have saved her little one—but instead, she missed it because, like most of us, she relies on her intellect and places her faith in scientifically proven studies. Look, you can find arguments for or against just about anything in this world, but we need to maintain some grounded, realistic standards; otherwise, we’re all just drifting aimlessly into chaos.
Like I’ve said before, trying to help people battling cancer is incredibly slippery ground. You can stumble straight into hell through nothing more than good intentions. That’s why the smartest move is to simply present what you believe to be beneficial and then step back—let people decide for themselves if they want to take that leap or not. Once you've shared your truth, your mission is done. Pushing harder or trying to convince anyone beyond that usually just ends up being counterproductive. Personally, I put my entire faith in God's will; I believe that through His grace, healing can come from something as simple as an apple. But hey, that's just me—not everyone sees things that way.
Thanks again, and just so you know, I’m going to try giving this to my mom. It can’t hurt her, and honestly, I give this particular method a huge thumbs up.