393 posts shown.
Sam Green73 said:that's not how you start a conversation
Maria Nelson12 said:Real classy. Honestly, I’m just sitting here wondering why all those massive posts from the left wing trying to excuse the crimes haven't been nuked yet, and how it works out that basically everyone except Adler gets banned while the conservatives get the hammer.
Maria Nelson12 said:So, I guess if this whole discussion about the Manolić investigation and Boljkovac is centered on crimes committed sixty years ago, we aren't allowed to actually talk about the motivations behind those crimes because that would be "derailing"? I mean, if they didn't have some kind of reason for committing those crimes, they wouldn't have done them in the first place, and then there wouldn't even be a topic to discuss. That seems like a pretty valid way to expand the conversation.
But honestly, I think that's only being called derailing because I managed to prove something in my posts that directly contradicts what the other side is claiming. So apparently, proving facts is "derailing," and that's why certain posts get deleted just to hide the truth—whereas when Resonatorov and his buddy F10XX post stuff that has absolutely nothing to do with the subject, it doesn't count as derailing and stays up: I haven't seen any 'leftists' hanging out at the local boardwalks or beach bars.
I mean, what does people gathering at the boardwalk or beach bars have to do with this investigation? Nothing, really. But hey, whatever helps them sleep at night...
George Booth58 said:It’s about the connection that "common sense" types—you know, those people who live on the edge of politics—would just lump under Politics. 😍😍
And yeah, a total generalization by the masses, obviously. 😳
George Booth58 said:I guess this assumes I'm supposed to be a Republican—or maybe you've just been following my constant work for a while now. 😍 😍 🤣
George Booth58 said:Democrats are just hypocritical fanatics—nothing else to say about them.
BTW, how’s that whole thing going; Albright's, forget about Mexico... Mexican trumpets hate saxophones, and the Mexican sky hates NATO planes. 🤣🤣🤣
dustypuma5 said:Can I call you mellowraven22?
I honestly can't believe we're still having this debate, but here we go again! I was just sitting here thinking about how much things have changed lately, and it feels like every time I log onto Reddit, someone is bringing up this exact same topic. It’s funny, really—it reminds me of those endless family dinners back home where everyone thinks they’re an expert on everything from politics to the best way to grill a steak. You know the vibe: loud, passionate, and slightly chaotic. Anyway, I wanted to jump in because I feel like we’re missing the forest for the trees here. We get so caught up in the tiny details that we forget what we were actually trying to solve in the first place. I remember back when I was working my first big job in Chicago, I used to get into these massive arguments with my manager about project timelines. Looking back, most of it was just noise. We were so focused on being "right" that we forgot to be productive. So, let's take a breath. Instead of just circling the drain with the same old arguments, why don't we try looking at this from a different angle? I've been reading up on some new approaches to this, and honestly, it changes the whole conversation. What do you guys think? Is it worth sticking to the old way, or are we ready to actually move forward? I'm curious to see if anyone else feels like we're just spinning our wheels. kaže:
Reddit actually has its own dedicated sub-forum. On the edge of politics....which basically serves as a little oasis for primitives to gather and hurl insults based on nationality or religion.
redmarlin3 said:Since you're so quick to bring up "classic provocations," it would be nice if you actually had posts on more than six different threads in the subforum you're supposedly "agitating." That way, those of us who want to get a handle on your whole persona might actually figure out if you're just kidding around...
As it stands, the only thing you're really provoking is that old-school mindset of "I don't care if my wife dies, but I won't let anyone disrespect her."
jadeseal4 said:If it weren't so disheartening, I suppose it would actually be quite humorous.
The various sites that Josipovićne frequents.
Why do these locations serve as the common denominator for their shared perspective?
Ryan Harris10 said:I am somewhat confused as to how this topic relates to domestic politics—perhaps it should have been moved to a global affairs section instead? Or is it simply that the moderators now view the entire region through a single lens?
slybison8 said:I guess we shall see. I don't rule out the possibility that you might be right. However, I feel it is necessary to address the somewhat "totalitarian" nature of your statement, in which you attempt to strip away someone's political legitimacy simply because they chose to engage in a bit of "rebellion" against the establishment.
In today's political climate, such a claim feels quite brazen, as it seems to advocate for a kind of "obedience" that, I suspect, shouldn't be the primary way people behave if we want to maintain a functional democracy.
Political "rebellion" should probably be viewed as a positive trend, and it is honestly quite sad for America that the only figures who ever seem to take that path are bosses like those seen in New York City politics—not even someone like Donald Trump, who I believe broke through largely on his own merits.
I suppose it is a good thing that all the Republicans who disagreed with George W. Bush, or who disagree with Tim Geithner today—yet continue to endure and support their policies due to secondary interests or lack of influence—had the courage to "rebel" and remove them from power back around 2004 or 2005, once it became clear whose interests were actually being served...
Perhaps rebellion ought to be encouraged rather than mocked.
Richard Wilson4 said:I could have sent Sam Green73 that link, but I decided against it...
cosmicskipper39 said:It’s really kind of you to be so respectful toward our President, though honestly, using the term "Yugoslav" isn't an insult anymore—it's just totally outdated for today's world. By the way, voter turnout for the election was right around 40%.