Home › cosmiclynx57 › Posts

Posts by cosmiclynx57

629 posts shown.

Bad Boys for Life (2020) in Movies · Jan 21, 2020

silentpanther7 said:Since you're such a genius, let's just say it's a woman☕

There, that's what you were trying to say.

Man, talk about sarcasm! I was just kidding around, honey. 😉 Don't take it personally! 🙂

Look, if I were actually being serious right now, I’d probably have a valid excuse to make—I mean, just look at the guy in the profile picture! Since the avatar is a dude, you'd naturally assume we're talking about a guy here, wouldn't you? 😁

And there you have it. That’s exactly what I was getting at. Honestly, that's pretty much my whole point right there—I said it, I meant it, and I'm standing by it (even if I had to wrap it in a massive layer of sarcasm just to make it stick). See? Told you!

Bad Boys for Life (2020) in Movies · Jan 20, 2020

silentpanther7 said:I think this is top-tier. Bad Boys are absolute comedy classics, just like Mad Max.
Just seeing Will Smith and Martin Lawrence on screen is enough to get you laughing; you don't need anything else.

briskhound2, man, the guy just didn't put it quite the right way, you know? Let me break it down for you so it actually makes sense. 😁

Subtitle on!

Honestly, I am absolutely loving this! For me, Bad Boys is hands down one of my all-time favorite comedy franchises—it just hits different, you know? It’s right up there with classics like Ride Along for me. Just pure, unadulterated fun!
Honestly, just seeing Will Smith and Martin Lawrence together is enough to get you cracking up immediately! I mean, especially looking at Martin Lawrence lately—he’s definitely carrying a little extra weight these days—but man, you don't even need anything else once they're on screen. Okay, fine, you *do* need other stuff too, obviously, and let's be real, they aren't exactly the same guys they were back in the day, but you know exactly what I'm getting at, right? That chemistry is just everything!

And that's exactly what I was getting at! 🤣

Togo (2019) in Movies · Jan 3, 2020

Drew Long76 said:I'm just really crossing my fingers that there isn't some tragic ending involved, you know? Like, please don't let it be a dog dying or any of those other depressing tropes.

Honestly, it’s totally doable, but I’m just begging that they don't spoil anything too early—or at least throw out a massive spoiler warning if someone's planning on leaking the plot.

Vin Diesel in Movies · Dec 26, 2019

Jessica Morris6 said:Why on earth would you want to watch the absolute worst entry in a trilogy without any context...

Honestly, I totally blanked on Pitch Black being the first one! I watched the trailers and everything, but since they came out so long ago, it completely slipped my mind that I’d actually seen them. Though, looking at my history, I did rate them on IMDb, so I guess that's proof enough that I've sat through them, haha.

I'm definitely gonna check out this third one though, because honestly, even if nothing else, it looks like a total blast.

Avengers saga vs. Star Wars sequel trilogy in Movies · Dec 25, 2019

The Avengers are basically eating two new Star Wars movies for breakfast (haven't checked out the third one yet). There isn't even much to say about it, honestly—they're just better and way more fun movies.

Even though those first two entries in the new Star Wars trilogy aren't terrible, the Avengers films are just higher quality overall.

Vin Diesel in Movies · Dec 25, 2019

Wait, so are all those Riddick movies actually connected to each other? Like, can I just jump straight into the latest one from 2013 without having seen any of the earlier stuff first?

Roland Emmerich movies in Movies · Dec 18, 2019

Kenneth Perez15 said:Actually, a gate is more like a portal. A Star portal.

Roland Emmerich is basically the king of high-budget trash.

The whole Stargate thing is fine, I guess. Independence Day was decent—a bit overly sentimental, sure—Godzilla was mediocre at best, and Moonfall isn't actually bad; honestly, it’s probably his least terrible movie.

As for 2012, that wasn't a disaster movie—that movie *was* a disaster. Even the trailer for Midway sounded like total garbage.

Wait, what did he just say? 🤣

Gate

Roland Emmerich movies in Movies · Dec 17, 2019

Frank Moore4 said:Let’s talk about the filmography of Roland Emmerich.

In light of this new cinematic spectacle... Roland Emmerich under the title "2012Since he’s gearing up to hit theaters again next summer—and we can probably expect to see "Fantastic Voyage" popping up sometime in 2010, which is basically his take on a "microcosm" style remake—I decided to put together a little poll. I want to see which of his movies you guys actually dig and which ones you absolutely can't stand.

1. Universal Soldier (1992)

It’s that classic flick where you finally get to see Jean-Claude Van Damme and Dolph Lundgren go head-to-head for the first time. They play these intense, almost unstoppable soldiers who are basically built for war, going at it as bitter rivals. It’s a total blast.

2. Stargate (1994)

Kurt Russell (as J. O'Neill) and James Spader (as D. Jackson) head through the Stargate and land on the planet Abydos, where they end up going toe-to-toe with the Goa'uld—who we eventually find out are actually called the Goa'uldi in Stargate SG-1. Personally, aside from Independence Day, this is my favorite Emmerich film. It’s also the one that paved the way for awesome shows like Stargate SG-1 and Stargate Atlantis.

3. Independence Day (1996)

One of the absolute biggest hits from the 90s, and man, those visual effects are still seriously impressive. I’ve sat through this one a few times now, and honestly, I think I can confidently say it’s easily Roland Emmerich's best work to date. By the way, besides the heavy-hitting cast we all know, you really have to give props to Mary McDonnell—she's fantastic, and most people probably recognize her from her role as President Roslin over in Battlestar Galactica.

4. Godzilla (1998)

It’s a spectacular film about a giant lizard, but honestly, it feels a little bit dim-witted—kind of like the Japanese original.

5. The Patriot (2000)

Mel Gibson taking on the Red Coats. And then you've got Odo from DS9 playing a priest. 😁

6. The Day After Tomorrow (2004)

Honestly, this movie is absolutely spectacular. Sure, it’s riddled with logic holes just like 10,000 B.C., but that’s not really the point. You just have to turn your brain off, stop overthinking it, and just sit back and enjoy the high-octane thrills from Dennis Quaid and the rest of the crew.

7. 10,000 B.C. (2008)

Honestly, whoever penned this script clearly didn't give much thought to whether the plot actually made sense. And don't even get me started on how Emmerich basically ripped off his own work from Stargate. But hey, if you just turn your brain off for a bit, you can still get an hour or two of solid entertainment out of it.

Wait, you mean the Gate?! Are we seriously talking about the Gate right now? 😲 So, when you look at how they handle the translation, "door" basically means "gate," which makes sense because the whole movie is titled Stargate! It’s all about that central gateway, right?

Honestly, if you ask me, the 1994 Stargate is hands down the absolute best one out there! I mean, can we even debate that? It just hits different, right?

Man, I’m telling you, *The Patriot* is honestly just as solid! I’m seriously torn between those two, though—it’s a tough call, isn't it?

I haven't actually sat down to watch Midway (2019) yet!

The Grudge (2004) in Movies · Dec 7, 2019

Zachary Williams29 said:that trailer music 😲 🙂is just

Seriously, that was some brutally eerie music! 😲🙏

Hellboy (2019) in Movies · Nov 22, 2019

It was honestly alright—definitely below average, but hey, it was a total blast to watch and looked gorgeous on screen. My main expectation was just to be entertained, and I guess it actually checked that box for me! My rating: 4/10

The Hunger Games franchise in Movies · Oct 24, 2019

Alright, here’s the deal. I totally bailed on watching The Hunger Games movies because, for some reason, I figured they were going to be total trash—and man, was I wrong.

So far, I’ve powered through the first two, and honestly? I might just call it a day right there for now.

To be real with you guys, I actually liked the first one more than the second.

The first installment brings such an engaging story to the table; it’s definitely aimed at that teen demographic, but that’s exactly what I’m in the mood for lately (and let’s be clear, I absolutely adore Harry Potter, so I'm not exactly picky about YA stuff).
I really dug the opening, specifically that studio announcement and all the buildup before the actual "game" kicks off. Lawrence is phenomenal, though I never really doubted that, since she already proved herself back when she was in Winter's Bone nearly nine years ago. All in all, it’s a fun, interesting ride, even if it isn't reinventing the wheel—definitely worth the watch, though.

The sequel is just as gripping, but it feels a bit more "polished," which is fine by me, since the first one felt like it was missing a little bit of that sheen. That said, it didn't blow the first one out of the water for me, and it feels slightly dragged out, though it’s certainly not boring.

I'll have to see if I have the energy to dive into part 3 tonight, or if I should just pivot to something else. I'm not feeling super motivated to keep pushing through, especially since everyone keeps commenting that the third one is a step down from the first two.

The Hunger Games franchise in Movies · Oct 21, 2019

The Hunger Games
(film series)

IMDb

IMDb:

The Hunger Games (2012)

The Hunger Games: Catching Fire (2013)

The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 (2014)

The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 2 (2015)

Well, we finally made it to the grand finale of this massive franchise! It feels like just yesterday when the first installment hit theaters back in March 2012, kicking off a steady rhythm where we'd get a new one every November. That first entry into The Hunger Games was directed by Gary Ross, based on the YA bestseller by Suzanne Collins, but once the second movie rolled around, Francis Lawrence took over the director's chair.

And honestly, can we talk about how huge that first movie was? It grabbed everyone's attention and became one of the absolute biggest hits of 2012, ranking as the third most watched movie in the USA, right behind The Avenger and The Dark Knight Rises. Even though it crushed it at the box office, the critics weren't exactly throwing roses at Ross's work. But then, Francis Lawrence stepped in and totally breathed new life into the whole series. Something pretty rare actually happened—the sequel ended up being better than the original in basically every way, from the sheer earnings to the actual quality of the filmmaking! The second part held such a strong spot on the 2013 charts, and in the USA, it actually climbed all the way to the top, beating out heavy hitters like Frozen, Iron Man 3, Man of Steel, Gravity, and even Gravity! That’s a seriously massive achievement, especially when you consider that almost all the biggest blockbusters in the States from the last forty years have been led by men. Thanks to Katniss Everdeen, Jennifer Lawrence turned into a total global superstar and made a ton of money—I mean, looking at the highest-paid stars of 2015, the only person ahead of this incredibly talented twenty-five-year-old was Robert Downey Jr.!

The Hunger Games: Catching Fire (2013) really had all the right ingredients to be an epic dystopian spectacle, didn't it? It wasn't just kids watching it either; the movie pulled in older crowds too—mostly action junkies and sci-fi fans, but also people who were just drawn to seeing such a powerhouse female lead on screen. Now, we all know the Hollywood machine is always hungry for cash, so they decided to split the final book of the Suzanne Collins trilogy, Glory of Freedom, into two separate movies instead of just one. Was that a smart move? Honestly, it felt like a wrong call driven purely by producer greed, which meant the series' conclusion didn't hit quite as hard as it could have. Lawrence directed both halves of Glory of Freedom, but this time around, he had to deal with some serious pacing issues and a lot of filler, especially in the first half. The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 (2014) felt more like a setup for the real end. Then came The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 2 (2015), which is still a hot topic in theaters worldwide, finally delivering that big, long-awaited payoff. So, was the wait worth it? Well, it's a bit of a "yes" and a "no" situation if you ask me.

The latest flick is definitely more of a rush and way more high-octane than the last one, though honestly? *The Hunt* still sits on a throne at the top for me—it’s just the gold standard for this whole series. The old crew is back together for the grand finale, and they actually beefed up the cast with some heavy hitters too. You've got TV favorites Elden Henson (*Daredevil*) and Michelle Forbes (*Homicide Division*, *Law & Order*) popping up in these really juicy cameo roles, but then you have Gwendoline Christie (*Game of Thrones*, and she's even headed to the next *Star Wars* installment!) who felt totally wasted in this one static scene where she didn't get any action at all. It was also pretty wild how Philip Seymour Hoffman's sudden passing didn't derail the release date; he'd already knocked out most of his scenes, so the studio managed to pull off some movie magic to "patch" things up. When you weigh it all up, *The Hunger Games* is a solid, if a bit uneven, franchise that's mostly going to be remembered for that strong neo-feminist message it carries. Prequels or sequels? Don't rule them out just yet, especially since the big shots over at Lionsgate—the studio behind the whole saga—are already talking about opening a massive theme park inspired by *The Hunger Games*. Looks like we're in for more fun later on!

Source

Psycho vs The Shining in Movies · Sep 28, 2019

@Patrick Martin/">@@Patrick Martin

You're spot on, man.

Oscar Fraudulent Activity: Wrong Category Nominations in Movies · Aug 27, 2019

briskhound2 said:It's The Others, not The Hours

Man, how did I even mix those movies up? 😲🤣😵

I seriously didn't get nearly enough sleep last night—only managed about three hours.

Oscar Fraudulent Activity: Wrong Category Nominations in Movies · Aug 27, 2019

hollowsailor19 said:Nicole Kidman in The Hours. Honestly, I'm pretty split on it; it felt a bit too slow for my taste.

A whole mix of things. Definitely a leading role.

Watch out! Spoilers ahead! If you haven't seen the movie yet, consider this your warning.

So, we're following this mother dealing with her two kids, just trying to take care of them, right? But then things get really weird toward the end when it turns out she and her children are actually ghosts—it turns out she killed them all. It’s definitely a starring vehicle because the whole story centers on her experience as a mother and how she grapples with everything that happened.

Aladdin 2019 in Movies · Aug 22, 2019

Hey there! 👍

I honestly think those little tweaks they made were a smart move, you know? It keeps things from feeling like a carbon copy of the cartoon. They really nailed the vibe, though—it’s got that perfect *Aladdin* atmosphere going on. Major props to them for that! 🙏

As for the casting, picking the guy to play Aladdin was a total bullseye; he fits the part perfectly. Same goes for princess jasmine, too. And man, Will Smith is just legendary as the Genie! 👍

But oh boy, Ali Jaffar... what a disaster! 😵🙂 The actor they picked just doesn't fit the role at all. He just doesn't have that look, you know? He doesn't come across as truly villainous or anything; he just lacks that menacing energy you need for the wicked Jafar.
Honestly, I think Charles Dance would have been the absolute perfect choice for that role.

Aladdin 2019 in Movies · Aug 13, 2019

Man, I have been dreaming about seeing an Aladdin movie live-action since forever, and I’m so stoked it finally actually happened! Honestly, even though the new one is cool, I still have such a massive soft spot for that 1992 animated classic. It just hits different, you know?

Hunter Killer (2018) in Movies · Jul 31, 2019

Honestly, it’s a blast from start to finish. Sure, you might feel like you've seen it all before, but if you're a sucker for submarine warfare, you're gonna have a great time.

Maria Morgan2 said:Honestly, I actually dug this movie quite a bit. I figured I’d just ignore some of the nitpicks and just enjoy the ride, you know? It’s such a damn shame we don't get more submarine warfare flicks anymore, especially the ones set during WWII. I mean, there is so much potential for killer movies in that era, but hey, it is what it is. For a one-time watch, it was totally fine if you aren't one of those people constantly looking for flaws where they don't exist.

☕

Totally agree. It's a bummer, right? Personally, I think it's good enough to watch more than just once.

Cold Pursuit (2019) in Movies · May 11, 2019

Honestly, it felt way too dragged out for no reason. Don't get me wrong, I usually dig a slower burn and longer runtimes just so things don't feel rushed or confusing, but this one? It felt like it was stretched thin by at least fifteen or thirty minutes too many.

Movie theater etiquette: What are your thoughts? in Movies · Apr 22, 2019

Daniel Kelly57 said:👍I spent my whole childhood there! And yeah, the volume is ridiculous. I asked them to turn it down more times than I can count. Pretty sure they crank it up on purpose for some reason. 🍿

Honestly, I'd much rather have it too loud than too quiet.

I actually love it when things get loud because, hello, I paid to go to a movie theater specifically to feel that massive sound pressure, right? I don't want my little desktop speakers at home to be punchier than the huge professional setup in the actual auditorium!
It was such a letdown when that new cinema opened up in my city because the sound was just so weak—it totally kills the whole experience if you can't feel the action happening.