Posts by cosmiclynx57

Maria James94 said:It’s honestly wild how Shelby just looks incredible, no matter which version you’re looking at 😁

Who is Shelby? Seriously, does anyone actually know the deal with this guy?

If you’re talking about the ride in that photo, yeah, that’s definitely a Mustang.

So, I was just thinking about that upcoming flick *Frankenstein*, you know, the one coming out in 2011? It’s being helmed by James Wan, which honestly makes me way more curious than if some random director were taking the reins, right? And get this—Tony Gilroy is on board too! When you see names like that floating around, you can't help but wonder if this is going to be some high-octane masterpiece or just another wild ride. Plus, we've got Paul W. S. Anderson involved, which usually means things are going to get pretty intense and visually crazy. I mean, can you even imagine the lineup they're putting together? We're talking about Sean Bean, Tanit Phoenix, and Danny Trejo all sharing the screen... and then there's Ving Rhames in the mix as well! How much star power can one movie actually hold before it starts feeling like a heavy hitter? It feels like such a massive ensemble, and I'm dying to see how they balance all those big personalities in one story. Is it going to be a total adrenaline rush? I'm leaning towards yes, especially with this crew.

So, I just heard that Frankenstein is officially in the works! It’s being helmed by James Wan, which honestly makes me way more curious about the vibe than if anyone else were calling the shots. On top of that, we've got Tony Gilroy and Paul W. S. Anderson handling the writing duties, so you know the script is probably going to be intense. This whole thing is actually a prequel to the 2008 Frankenstein, and get this—the cast is absolutely stacked with Sean Bean, Tanit Phoenix, and Danny Trejo. Can you even imagine the energy on that set? It sounds like it’s going to be a total blast!



So, I was just thinking about it, and get this—Frankenstein is actually a sequel! Can you believe that? It’s basically picking up where things left off, which honestly makes so much sense if you think about the whole vibe they're going for. So, I was just sitting here thinking about the 2008 flick *Frankenstein*, and man, does it take me back! You know those movies that you just watch to turn your brain off and enjoy the absolute chaos? That’s this one right there. It’s got that gritty, high-octane energy that just hits different when you're looking for a mindless adrenaline rush. I mean, seriously, who doesn't love watching armored vehicles tearing through a dystopian wasteland while everyone tries to kill each other? It’s pure spectacle! Even if the plot isn't exactly breaking any ground or winning any Oscars, the sheer intensity of the vehicular combat keeps you glued to the screen. It’s loud, it’s messy, and it’s honestly a blast if you go into it expecting nothing more than explosions and heavy metal. Have you guys ever sat through a movie like this and realized it’s actually way more fun than the "prestige" dramas people keep raving about? Sometimes you just need that raw, unadulterated mayhem, you know what I mean? So, I was just sitting here thinking about those movies that dropped back in 2008 and we've been waiting forever to see what happens next, especially with all the hype building up for everything slated to hit theaters around 2011? Can you even believe how much time has passed since then? It feels like a lifetime ago, right? Honestly, it’s wild to think about how many projects from that era are finally gearing up to actually see the light of day in a couple of years!
So, about that *Frankenstein* movie from 2008—just a heads-up for anyone wondering, the one we're talking about is actually a remake, right? It makes you wonder which version is actually gonna get a sequel, doesn't it? So, I was just sitting here thinking about that absolute cult classic, *Frankenstein 2000*, and man, can we talk about how wild that movie actually is? You know the one—that high-octane, total madness from back in the day! It’s one of those flicks that just grabs you by the throat and doesn't let go, right? I mean, who hasn't felt that rush of seeing such unhinged, over-the-top action on screen? It’s got this gritty, unapologetic energy that modern blockbusters just seem to struggle to replicate nowadays. Is it even possible to capture that kind of raw, chaotic spirit anymore without everything feeling too polished or "safe"? Honestly, I don't think so! It's just pure, unfiltered adrenaline from start to finish.

Check out these links:

Frankenstein on IMDb
Frankenstein
So, I was just digging through some info on the upcoming Frankenstein movie, and I couldn't help but wonder—who exactly is working on this thing? It’s one of those projects where you start looking at the credits and realize just how much heavy lifting is happening behind the scenes to bring this vision to life! Does anyone else get that weirdly excited feeling when they see a massive list of names and starts trying to piece together the whole production vibe? I mean, we already know we've got James Wan stepping in to direct, which honestly changes the whole energy of the project, right? And having Tony Gilroy involved too? That’s a serious power move if you ask me. Plus, with Paul W. S. Anderson still part of the equation, you just know there's going to be some seriously intense action coming our way. And can we talk about the cast for a second? We’re looking at legends like Sean Bean, along with Tanit Phoenix and Danny Trejo, plus the powerhouse Ving Rhames... I mean, how are you even supposed to prepare for a lineup like that? It feels like every time I check the details on Frankenstein, I find another reason to be hyped. Is it just me, or does this feel like it's shaping up to be something truly massive?

Honestly, this actually looks pretty solid—I think I'm definitely gonna give this movie a watch.

First off, I’ve gotta say this thread is absolutely killer—huge props for coming up with this idea! I can already tell I’m going to have a blast hanging out here. 👍👍

---

Alright, let's get this show on the road—first matchup:

The Last House on the Left (1972) vs. The Last House on the Left (2009)

Honestly, the original feels way too amateurish compared to the remake, which is just much more unsettling. You know how some newer horror flicks feel like they just dump fifty gallons of blood on the screen for shock value? Well, the remake avoids that trap and actually crushes the original by nailing the atmosphere instead.

*

Death Race 2000 (1975) vs. Death Race (2008)

I'm sticking with the original on this one because it's actually fun to watch, whereas the remake just felt kind of tedious to me.

*

Vanishing Point (1971) vs. Vanishing Point (1997)

The original takes the win for me since the remake is just weaker overall—it just doesn't hit the same way, you know?

Now this is an interesting topic 😁

If a ever actually shows up looking just like the one from the movie and starts picking people off, you can count me in as the prime suspect, because honestly, I've probably watched that flick more than 40 times already 😂

But seriously, jokes aside, it really depends on how you look at it—I can't think of any specific example right this second.

ruggedridge22 said:Independence Day has its merits, but it also serves as proof that Emmerich always seems to struggle with crossing the finish line to deliver a truly great film. The movie essentially unfolds in three acts—the first act, featuring the suspenseful build-up and the initial alien onslaught, is phenomenal; if the entire film had maintained that caliber, it would have been excellent. The second act starts to show some cracks, though it remains somewhat watchable. However, the third act contains some of the most nonsensical scenes I have ever encountered in a Hollywood blockbuster, but I won't go into detail here since there has already been plenty said about that specific issue. All in all, it’s a silly, entertaining ride, but it certainly could have been better.

War of the Worlds isn't exactly among Spielberg's finest works, but in this particular lineup, it is convincingly superior—it's more atmospheric, darker, and most of it is brilliantly directed. If only little Dakota wouldn't scream so much and pierce my eardrums; that's probably the main reason I've only watched this film a handful of times, even though I keep it in my collection...

Man, I am with you 100% on that 👍

So when we're talking about a remake, specifically that 2005 version of War of the Worlds, the atmosphere is just phenomenal, isn't it? It has one of the best openings ever because that scene at the very start where the Tripod emerges from the ground is just incredible—it totally pins you to your seat and makes you feel like you absolutely have to see the whole thing through to the end.

Even though the 1953 original is a total classic, if you ask me, both films are equally great.

Hannah Roberts said:I’m with you there. Honestly, The War of the Worlds is leagues better. I don't mind the ending one bit; it’s unconventional, and frankly, it makes way more sense than some Hollywood blockbuster where the President decides to personally lead an assault against aliens. I’ve always been a bit sick of that trope of the invincible American hero who somehow pulls off a miraculous, flashy stunt just when things look most hopeless. And like someone else pointed out, an ID isn't a parody unless that was the actual intent—which clearly wasn't the case here—so if it comes across that way, it's really just a testament to its own flaws. You could make the same argument about Armageddon, couldn't you? The themes aren't identical, sure, but the misguided approach is exactly the same.☕

You nailed it! 👍

I'm assuming you're talking about the original classic, but what's your take on the remake?

The War of the Worlds (1953)
War of the Worlds (2005)

Man, I just absolutely love both of these movies! Honestly, my vote goes straight to War of the Worlds regardless of whether we're talking about the original classic or the modern remake, because let's be real—both versions are just total masterpieces.

Justin Ward4 said:Honestly, I thought this movie was pretty terrible.
Up until the intermission, I actually had a feeling it might turn into something decent, but after that, it became painfully obvious they just ran out of time to wrap things up properly.
The final battle is so ridiculous it practically crosses the line into unintentional trash. SPOILER: Who on earth decided to throw kids on ponies and donkeys into the mix like that?? And where did they find the time for all that romantic nonsense right in the middle of a fight? Why even bother with a cavalry charge when you could just pick them off one by one with arrows and hold the bottleneck?
It’s clear there's a sequel coming—maybe even a prequel—which is probably the only reason they watered down the plot so much in the second half. At this rate, I'm just waiting for them to shove some Jar Jar Binks-style character into the next one and ruin the whole franchise from scratch.
As Cute says, someone just hand Mel Brooks a camera and let him take over!

And honestly, isn't that what basically everyone thinks? Like, if you really stop to think about it, I don't think a single soul actually gave it a thumbs up.

Is it even possible that the Riddler actually directed something this crappy?! Man, I was putting so much hope into the alien franchise 😢
I mean, I went into this one expecting anything *but* a total disaster, but hey, I guess I really need to sit down and watch the whole thing myself before I can truly pass judgment on how bad it actually is.

analograven5 said:But honestly, I don't think it'll come anywhere close to those older classics.😉

It's probably just because I was so much younger back then—some things hit way harder when you're a kid, you know? Now, everything feels a bit different.☕

These days, my expectations for movies are so much higher, and let's face it, it's pretty rare for anything to actually blow me away anymore.🙄

There is almost no way it’s going to be anywhere near the original or even the other sequels.

A huge part of why we loved them was just because we were kids at the time, right? But even if we were our current age back then, Freddy would still terrify us because the whole concept of a killer stalking you in your dreams was such a wild, crazy idea—now that we've seen it all before, it just doesn't feel quite as scary.

I'm right there with you; I expect so much from these things that I end up feeling disappointed a lot of the time.

Kevin Bailey2 said:Maybe they're trying to bring it back from the dead. 😂

Freddy R. I. P.

I'm definitely watching it, whatever happens, happens.

Same here.

I'm honestly just dying to see how it turns out—like, will it actually be a decent horror movie or what?

Wait, this thread already exists! Here's the link:

Robin Hood 2010

graniteheron132 said:Just a quick heads-up, you forgot to bold the movie title 🙄

How does this always happen to me? 🙄

The Adventures of Robin Hood (1938)

Here 😁

Thanks for catching that for me!

The original really hit the jackpot with that concept because back then, the idea of someone murdering people in their sleep was such a massive phenomenon—I mean, honestly, how brilliant can you get with an idea like that? Hats off to them, 🙏 but I feel like this new flick is going to play out differently. It’ll probably just terrify kids, whereas for the older crowd—especially those of us who actually lived through that era—it’s mostly just going to spark this huge craving to see Freddy in action on the big screen one more time.

nimblemarlin6 said:People who have already caught Robin Hood are tearing it apart.
Basically, the consensus seems to be that the story and the whole vibe don't actually feel like Robin Hood at all—it feels more like some weird mashup of Gladiator and Kingdom of Heaven, just without the high-octane action. Everyone’s saying Crowe is basically playing Maximus again, and that the whole thing is just a slog—like Scott was just filming through some haze or something.

If you want the full breakdown, there are plenty of spoiler-heavy reviews over on AICN.

I mean, it's possible, but honestly? I'm not even gonna touch those reviews or say anything else until I see it with my own eyes, though I've got a bad feeling that we'll never actually see a Robin movie that can ever top the absolute legend that is the original The Adventures of Robin Hood from 1938.

Betty Wright64 said:So, I was just at the grocery store, right? And I’m standing there near the dairy aisle—you know, browsing the yogurt and milk section—when suddenly, out of nowhere, I run right into Cate Blanchett! 😁

I just had to hop on here and share that with you guys. 😁 😉 😁

Is this some kind of joke or what? 😕
I mean, where on earth does Steven Ruiz live that he just bumps into Cate Blanchett like it's nothing? 🤷

Don't get me wrong, Cate Blanchett is an incredible actress and she's got a killer filmography, even if I haven't sat through all of her stuff, if I'm being totally honest.

Here’s the list of hers I’ve actually seen:

The Talented Mr. Ripley
Charlotte Gray
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
The Missing
Coffee and Cigarettes

Also, can I just vent for a second about how these threads are set up? Like, when you start a discussion about an actor, it shouldn't matter if you actually met them in person or not—you really should include some basic info and a photo to get things going, don't you think?

***********************
***********************

Cate Blanchett



Catherine Elizabeth Blanchett (born May 14, 1969), better known as Cate Blanchett, is a world-renowned American actress and stage director.

Blanchett shot to international stardom in 1998 with the film Elizabeth, directed by Shekhar Kapur, where she played Elizabeth I. She’s also iconic for her role as the ethereal Queen Galadriel in The Lord of the Rings trilogy, and for her portrayal of Katharine Hepburn in Aviator, which earned her an Oscar for Best Supporting Actress. Along with her husband Andrew Upton, she currently serves as an artistic director for the Steppenwolf Theatre Company. On top of that, they run their own film production company called "Dirty Films."


Blanchett as Galadriel in The Lord of the Rings trilogy

Lord of the Rings IMDB

Lawrence Booth2 said:IMDb is basically garbage at this point

Man, I feel that on a spiritual level... I once swore up and down I'd be faithful to her until the day I died, too.😁

Andrew Clark said:I actually found myself pleasantly surprised by this one. A top-tier thriller in my book...

I’m right there with you, 👍

It’s actually way better than the original, which is such a rare find since usually, the remake just ends up being a total letdown compared to the first one.

Christian Taylor3 said:🤣🤣🤣

Hell no, obviously.

The Female, I’m seriously glad I could give you a good laugh. 😉
But look, let me just hammer this home one more time: absolutely NOT. 😁 Seriously, man, 😍

It is honestly such a stupid idea to take a break mid-movie, because if I’ve set aside specific time to sit down and watch a film, I want to actually experience that movie from start to finish without some annoying interruption, you know?
I mean, doesn't anyone else feel like those theater intermissions were basically invented just so they can squeeze more money out of people for overpriced popcorn and snacks? Because honestly, that sounds pretty spot on to me.

Dennis Doyle3 said:IMDb
When it comes to ratings, I don't just blindly follow everything. I usually factor in age and sometimes gender too, just to find my own little middle ground.

I look at the scores too, but honestly, they aren't some perfect yardstick, right? Because let's be real—sometimes total flops end up with high ratings while actual masterpieces get trashed, and vice versa! But then, other times, the scores are spot on, and I'll find myself giving a movie the exact same rating as the rest of the crowd over on IMDb.

It’s actually kind of wild how I basically resurrected this whole thread because nobody had said a word here for years! To be totally precise, since January 13, 2003, there wasn't a single post until yesterday, March 25, 2010, when I finally dropped a comment after a seven-year hiatus, and suddenly the whole conversation is alive again.