Posts by slytinker11

I'm giving away two books: Cancer, Problem, and Solution and The Oil-Protein Cookbook by Dr. Johanna Budwig, if anyone can actually use them.
Chicago.

Good grief, what an absolute snooze fest of a movie. 🥱
Dzejla, honestly, half the ticket price is more than enough for this—just give us the rest of our money back. 🙂 🙂

Honestly, such a beautiful movie.

What's the deal with this constant ignoring?
Did they shut down the entire department and just forget to send out a memo or something?

Sometimes silence speaks louder than words, so I guess thanks for the response. :*

KLC, look, I know you’re probably busy playing hero over at the FBI since about 84% of the complaints we get are directed right at you. You actually showed up yesterday after the question was posted, so maybe try showing some actual decency and answer while the topic is still fresh for once.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy J5 on Twitter

Why on earth did they delete my post in The Chase thread again? I was just saying how pathetic it is that Eger is out there trying to defend PBS like it’s some kind of holy crusade.
What is even controversial about that?

Thanks for leaving me on read.
If you think I'm going to be sitting around waiting for some half-baked response in April, you've got another thing coming. I'm out.

Who is it, and why the hell does someone keep deleting my on-topic posts on Twitter?

The last one vanished just three minutes ago.
I honestly don't get it—I’m literally talking about the episode that just aired, so can someone please explain what's going on?

Just a heads-up about a banned user BornaVeliki Harmony. For days now, they’ve been posting under the "Tennis Day" PDF even though they’re clearly registered properly.

Is the notification system glitching out or something? 🍿

The whole movie is basically one big, mindless joke.
It’s actually kind of fun if you go in with absolutely zero expectations.
But man, it is way too long. That last half hour felt like total filler.

Plus, there's just constant nudity everywhere 😲, which is awkward considering how many seven or eight-year-olds end up in theaters. 😁

Just please, anything but Greco for moderation. 🙂

The guy is the heart and soul of this subforum, but that dark energy in his username would just weigh him down completely.

What a mess. 🤣

Seriously, everyone just back off. I am neither the topic of conversation nor some candidate for moderation.
Nobody even asked for your opinion. 🙂

Larry Sanchez7 said:All this talk about Agassi and Gaćopotezač... slytinker11 is doing the exact same thing with those players she can't stand. Honestly, I think we're all guilty of it, so I have no idea why anyone is even dragging Agassi into this.

It’s not about Gaćopotezač. It’s pretty obvious you don't really know what you're talking about.

Nicole Anderson55 said:And we all know who fought for those rules over there.

Okay, I absolutely have to respond to this nonsense. 😲

I didn't fight for those rules. I was against them, that's for sure. 🙂

I’ve got a concrete suggestion here: Louie needs some serious backup.

And I don't mean just some random person whose name is only there to take up space on the roster.

Look, it’s all well and good that some of you want to play the hero and try to brighten my day 🙂, but let’s be real—that kind of "love" doesn't actually get anything done. 🙂

I’m totally with Luke on this—it would be great if we picked someone active who everyone actually knows. So, I’m putting my money on Lyra. From what I can see, she hasn't been caught up in any major drama or scandals in her history here. 🙂

Dana Nelson said:Just because Michael Ramos4 wasn't trolling once doesn't change the fact that she is trolling hard this time around. And thank God I have more screenshots from you guys.

For those of you with the memory of a goldfish, let me refresh your minds.😁

Here’s the original post.

Old News, 13:34 #6394
Michael Ramos4
Registered User

Michael Ramos4 Avatar

Registration: July 2012.
Posts: 2,530

If you’ve already mastered the art of whining about absolutely everything, you could have at least learned how to quote properly. And maybe learned that spamming is against the rules.

As for the rest of this... Are you kidding me? 😁
I refuse to believe that characters in TV shows don't lie. And I am certainly not going to let you dictate who believes whom, just like you try to dictate who is welcome in a discussion thread.

I’m expecting a formal report against Jerry Campbell7 too, because she hasn't managed to convince Feriha that she actually regrets her actions yet.

northernstag7 said:Feriha, stop twisting the facts! I would personally tell Michael Ramos4 to stop distorting the truth because you do it in almost every single other post. Isn't that just like Feriha (exactly how you describe her), right?
You claim you don't see Feriha showing any remorse, yet it is presented loud and clear to all of us in the series (Dana Nelson even showed it to us again, though we've all seen it before). When I read your post claiming she isn't repenting, I actually see Feriha in you—specifically the version from season one who constantly lies—because your post isn't based on an opinion, but on a blatant distortion of what was actually seen (the facts). It makes me wonder: what is the difference between the two of you that you simply cannot grasp or comprehend regarding her lies, when you are doing the exact same thing?!
Furthermore, regarding what you wrote on the main thread about the girl Aynur (Feriha's roommate at the dorm):

We finally have another example of a beautiful and brilliant student... Aynur, who shockingly has no clue who the prince or the big shot on campus is, and on top of that, she is honest and smart, and lovely.

I would love to understand how you formed such a strong opinion based on a mere ten sentences, seven of which were just questions directed at Feriha. How is it possible that in the very moment we met this girl, you characterized her so boldly, yet by episode 50, you failed to see a single instance of positive behavior from Feriha?
I forgot to mention that you also neglected to characterize this same Aynur as being a liar, given that eleven of her sentences were falsehoods (since Feriha is at the university). How did you miss that? Oh, right—I forgot, you can probably attribute that solely to Feriha, while everyone else remains perfectly intelligent and honest!!!

Aside from having to justify why—oh, why— people aren't liking Ferha, now we apparently have to justify why some third-rate character *is* getting likes. 😂

By the way, we aren't on a soap opera sub-forum; we are on the PZK.

Dana Nelson said:Seriously, northernstag7, are you actually being that naive? River grabs coffee with Aynur practically every single day—he knows everything about her. 😁

Here is a textbook example of trolling and provocation right in front of us.

Since you want to pass off everything—from quoting the main character to expressing a personal opinion—as "trolling," let me give you a little tip for the future.

---

And these accusations against Adam, who—by the way—has been the very definition of objective and neutral on a thread that was practically soaked in blood and drama, are... just disgusting. 🙂

God, what a mess. 😵

Let’s get all the accusations about trolling and making stuff up out of thin air started right here with this post:

Michael Ramos4 said:Well, Emir finally spoke up...Feriha, stop twisting things...

And then there's Dana Nelson:

Dana Nelson said:This is nothing but trolling.

Emir never told her not to twist things.

Here’s the actual proof:


🤣

So, who exactly is making things up and trolling now? 😵

Dana Nelson said:If anyone wants to write a brand new script for the show, they should probably just reach out to MedYapim and ask for a job as a screenwriter.

I’m actually volunteering to buy a one-way ticket to New York City for the people involved here.

That seems to be the obvious solution to this whole mess—we'll stick to the actual script and the real plot points, and then we can all discuss the show's developments in peace. 😁

Just my little way of poking fun at all this nonsense. 🙂

Right? 😬

Dana Nelson said:Dear rustydrifter10,

We have a massive problem on the girl named Feriha thread.

Moderator Adam is out here deleting perfectly normal discussions about the show and its plot—while simultaneously letting Michael Ramos4 run wild on the forum, trolling everyone and making up her own fan fiction scenarios for the series.

I’ve already reported her for trolling—honestly, I couldn't help myself—and now I'm hearing from other women on the forum that, even though I'm still pretty new here, she's been flagged by plenty of others too.

There are several AFK threads floating around here—one of which features a pretty controversial female user who seems to turn that specific thread into an endless battlefield. She’s even dropping profanity in her posts. And honestly? Aside from Jay, the moderators are just letting it slide.

We don't run into these issues on the other AFK threads where that one controversial female user stays away. Honestly, you could have 100 women all holding completely different opinions—it wouldn't matter—because the vibe is just pure banter and total harmony.

Plus, this forum user is openly supporting violence against women.

I just reported her post where she says all that—but honestly, since moderator Adam is letting it slide, I’m not buying her plea for sympathy for a second.

Please read my application to the moderators.

I'm reporting this post for hate speech.

This forum user is openly advocating for physical violence against women. That’s a straight-up criminal offense under Article 325, Paragraph 1 of the Penal Code—inciting public violence and hatred.

I don't need to remind anyone that Warren Buffett ended up behind bars and is currently facing trial because of this mess. Honestly, if someone like him can be taken down, I feel like I should actually put in some effort to figure out who Riva really is.

Please, stop allowing this—just ban her from participating in any discussions regarding women or any other female-centric topics where she clearly has nothing of value to contribute.

Ovo je originalni post forumašice

Posts: 2,519
slap
If you ask me, that slap was exactly what Emir was going to do—just a predictable reaction to Roman’s provocation, which, as Roman already pointed out, was totally over the line and completely out of pocket. Honestly, now is really not the time for that kind of pushing and playing games. It’s just interrogating something that makes absolutely zero sense at that moment—honestly, what's the point?
Look, just to be crystal clear—I’m not trying to justify a slap in the face here, so let’s not get ahead of ourselves. But honestly? You reap what you sow. If you go looking for the devil, don't act surprised when he actually shows up. In this specific case, that slap is the devil coming to collect.
Shoving things in someone's face without thinking—and testing Emir's patience like that—is just plain rude and arrogant. Emir tries to shut it down, telling her, "Let's not go there, Feriha; we’re going to end up regretting this." He’s angry, understandably so, given everything he's dealing with—Riva, his father, the Yilmaz family, having his funding pulled—it’s a mess. It’s not like he has all the answers figured out yet, but instead of helping, Feriha keeps pushing Levent on him. I mean, if she had mentioned some random guy, fine, but it's *Levent*. Doesn't Feriha realize how much just the mention of Levent sets Emir off? Has she learned nothing from their history? It's like she doesn't know him at all. She promised she'd stand by him through everything, then went back on her word. She isn't offering any actual help or support during this shared crisis; honestly, she's just draining the life out of him, which is pretty much her specialty. To me, that isn't love. Feriha isn't showing any real affection here—when she needs to be his rock, she fails the test time and time again.

Aysun gave her a serious lecture—I'm honestly not even sure if Fer caught the drift of it. For the most part, she just kept staring at the floor or looking off to the side. And honestly, what I found most irritating was how Aysun tried to throw her off balance; it was such a cheap shot, totally in Fer's own style. Aysun actually handed her a perfect opening to prove her wrong, but Fer just doesn't know how to read between the lines. She can't prove anything because, well, the slap was followed immediately by her running away—who knows how many times now? You can't just run away from everything. You can't run away from a marriage or the hard stuff. You have to carry that weight and stand by the person you love.
@Akif, I’m with you on this one—your post hits the nail on the head. A marriage built on zero foundation, made without any real thought and for all the wrong reasons, is exactly why we’re seeing this mess unfold. Honestly, it’ll probably stay this way too, as long as Feriha refuses to trust Emir. She spends all her time running away from everything, and frankly, her behavior toward people—especially how she treats Emir—means she isn't going to achieve a single thing. The way she communicates is just... grating. It’s irrational, totally lacks tact, and shows zero consideration for anyone else. She’s so hyper-focused on her own interests and avoiding any kind of hardship that it always ends up blowing up right in her face. And let's talk about Emir—he definitely can't carry the weight of the world alone. In my opinion, he’s basically fighting these life battles and marriage struggles entirely by himself. He's lonely in that relationship. As for Feriha, it’s like she never developed a moral compass to begin with. She just wanders aimlessly through life, refusing to learn from her mistakes, somehow convinced that everything will just magically work itself out. She’s constantly at odds with everyone she meets. Where is she supposed to go? She feels suffocated by those massive buildings, cramped in her apartment—everywhere feels too small for her. But if you ask me, she’s most uncomfortable in her own skin, trapped by that cluttered, chaotic mess inside her own head.
Michael Ramos4 is online now Report inappropriate post
Reply with quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message

What? 😱
Haha, classic.

Dana Nelson said:Dear rustydrifter10,

We have a massive problem on the girl named Feriha thread.

Moderator Adam is out here deleting perfectly normal discussions about the show and its plot—while simultaneously letting Michael Ramos4 run wild on the forum, trolling everyone and making up her own fan fiction scenarios for the series.

I’ve already reported her for trolling—honestly, I couldn't help myself—and now I'm hearing from other women on the forum that, even though I'm still pretty new here, she's been flagged by plenty of others too.

There are several AFK threads floating around here—one of which features a pretty controversial female user who seems to turn that specific thread into an endless battlefield. She’s even dropping profanity in her posts. And honestly? Aside from Jay, the moderators are just letting it slide.

We don't run into these issues on the other AFK threads where that one controversial female user stays away. Honestly, you could have 100 women all holding completely different opinions—it wouldn't matter—because the vibe is just pure banter and total harmony.

Plus, this forum user is openly supporting violence against women.

I just reported her post where she says all that—but honestly, since moderator Adam is letting it slide, I’m not buying her plea for sympathy for a second.

Please read my application to the moderators.

I'm reporting this post for hate speech.

This forum user is openly advocating for physical violence against women. That’s a straight-up criminal offense under Article 325, Paragraph 1 of the Penal Code—inciting public violence and hatred.

I don't need to remind anyone that Warren Buffett ended up behind bars and is currently facing trial because of this mess. Honestly, if someone like him can be taken down, I feel like I should actually put in some effort to figure out who Riva really is.

Please, stop allowing this—just ban her from participating in any discussions regarding women or any other female-centric topics where she clearly has nothing of value to contribute.

Ovo je originalni post forumašice

Posts: 2,519
slap
If you ask me, that slap was exactly what Emir was going to do—just a predictable reaction to Roman’s provocation, which, as Roman already pointed out, was totally over the line and completely out of pocket. Honestly, now is really not the time for that kind of pushing and playing games. It’s just interrogating something that makes absolutely zero sense at that moment—honestly, what's the point?
Look, just to be crystal clear—I’m not trying to justify a slap in the face here, so let’s not get ahead of ourselves. But honestly? You reap what you sow. If you go looking for the devil, don't act surprised when he actually shows up. In this specific case, that slap is the devil coming to collect.
Shoving things in someone's face without thinking—and testing Emir's patience like that—is just plain rude and arrogant. Emir tries to shut it down, telling her, "Let's not go there, Feriha; we’re going to end up regretting this." He’s angry, understandably so, given everything he's dealing with—Riva, his father, the Yilmaz family, having his funding pulled—it’s a mess. It’s not like he has all the answers figured out yet, but instead of helping, Feriha keeps pushing Levent on him. I mean, if she had mentioned some random guy, fine, but it's *Levent*. Doesn't Feriha realize how much just the mention of Levent sets Emir off? Has she learned nothing from their history? It's like she doesn't know him at all. She promised she'd stand by him through everything, then went back on her word. She isn't offering any actual help or support during this shared crisis; honestly, she's just draining the life out of him, which is pretty much her specialty. To me, that isn't love. Feriha isn't showing any real affection here—when she needs to be his rock, she fails the test time and time again.

Aysun gave her a serious lecture—I'm honestly not even sure if Fer caught the drift of it. For the most part, she just kept staring at the floor or looking off to the side. And honestly, what I found most irritating was how Aysun tried to throw her off balance; it was such a cheap shot, totally in Fer's own style. Aysun actually handed her a perfect opening to prove her wrong, but Fer just doesn't know how to read between the lines. She can't prove anything because, well, the slap was followed immediately by her running away—who knows how many times now? You can't just run away from everything. You can't run away from a marriage or the hard stuff. You have to carry that weight and stand by the person you love.
@Akif, I’m with you on this one—your post hits the nail on the head. A marriage built on zero foundation, made without any real thought and for all the wrong reasons, is exactly why we’re seeing this mess unfold. Honestly, it’ll probably stay this way too, as long as Feriha refuses to trust Emir. She spends all her time running away from everything, and frankly, her behavior toward people—especially how she treats Emir—means she isn't going to achieve a single thing. The way she communicates is just... grating. It’s irrational, totally lacks tact, and shows zero consideration for anyone else. She’s so hyper-focused on her own interests and avoiding any kind of hardship that it always ends up blowing up right in her face. And let's talk about Emir—he definitely can't carry the weight of the world alone. In my opinion, he’s basically fighting these life battles and marriage struggles entirely by himself. He's lonely in that relationship. As for Feriha, it’s like she never developed a moral compass to begin with. She just wanders aimlessly through life, refusing to learn from her mistakes, somehow convinced that everything will just magically work itself out. She’s constantly at odds with everyone she meets. Where is she supposed to go? She feels suffocated by those massive buildings, cramped in her apartment—everywhere feels too small for her. But if you ask me, she’s most uncomfortable in her own skin, trapped by that cluttered, chaotic mess inside her own head.
Michael Ramos4 is online now Report inappropriate post
Reply with quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message

If you actually take the time to read the post you’re referencing—and honestly, if you just looked at all the other stuff this user posts that clearly gets under your skin—you’d see that what they're saying is a total lie.

Dana Nelson said:Look, regarding my previous rule-breaking—specifically the spoilers—I’ve been penalized, and I’m not even going to deny that I spoiled anything. I was new to the forum and didn't really grasp the rules yet.

This is the second time you've wiped out my on-topic posts, and honestly, your moderation style is the only thing I've actually complained about here—and that's saying something, since I've been in touch with other moderators like Jay and Bea, whose handling of things I have zero issues with.

So, on this thread, I only quoted your own message, which clearly shows you're just making up excuses for why you deleted my posts. You claimed I was arguing with people on the forum, then turned around and gave me a warning saying I wasn't allowed to disagree with people on the forum.

Actually, I'm kind of glad you quoted one of the posts you deleted tonight—you know, the second one you quoted.

It's because you've basically shown that as a moderator, you're completely contradicting yourself.

Let's take a look at that second post of mine that you quoted.

Is it on-topic? Yes.

Is the post related to the show's plot? Yes.

Does the post discuss specific scenes and events from the series? Yes.

Is the post about the specific behavior of the characters? Yes.

Is it rude, like those posts your friend makes? No.

Also, I'd love for you to quote my last post from the thread you deleted—the one where I comment on the characters' reactions to tonight's episode—so we can see exactly what else you've scrubbed and how much your moderation of this thread has absolutely nothing to do with the actual forum rules.

My first post, the one you quoted, was written because nobody could stand the mockery of physical violence against a woman on that thread started by Riva anymore. After I posted, there was just a wave of positive reactions from other members, which is living proof that people in that thread don't approve of your moderation and that you, as a moderator, are allowing the level of communication to drop below rock bottom.

Furthermore, now you're bringing up some supposed "subsequent agreements" with other moderators regarding the deletion of that first post you quoted, but that very post was publicly approved by one of the moderators on the thread.

Also, I'm just thrilled that as a moderator, you'd bring up my late grandmother in such a sarcastic and rude way—even if you think it's hilarious 😁—because doing that completely strips you of any valid argument and any right to accuse someone of flame war tactics.

Obviously, you don't even know them now.

cosmicorca5 said:I have to say, I am completely on the same page as Dana Nelson regarding this entire situation. This pattern of justifying violence isn't just a one-off comment tucked away in a single post; it’s been written repeatedly over and over again. The women in this community have already voiced their concerns, which is exactly why I stepped in to cite the Violence Against Women Act. I know, I know—citing legal definitions might seem out of place here, but I felt it was absolutely necessary to act as a reality check. We need certain people on this forum to realize that you can't just write whatever you want without consequences, especially since nobody seems to bother responding to the trolls targeting Michael Ramos4. To make matters even more interesting, moderator Jay actually left the post up with a note attached. However, shortly after that, moderator Adam M. went ahead and wiped out the post along with all the other legitimate discussions about yesterday's episode and its characters. And let's get one thing straight: this isn't some baseless grievance where I'm just complaining because someone happened to mention my name. It’s about the content itself.

If promoting violence is such a direct violation of this forum's rules, then why hasn't the moderator in charge of this specific thread stepped in to shut it all down? Why haven't those posts been sanctioned? It would be incredibly simple for her to just lay it out in plain English: state clearly that inciting violence is strictly forbidden both here on this platform and in the real world, and remind everyone that encouraging it isn't just a breach of etiquette—it’s a criminal offense punishable under the Penal Code. Dana Nelson She actually reported it!? Seriously, why does everyone feel the need to flag posts constantly? It’s like nobody actually understands what the issue is—and even when they do report them, nothing ever gets taken down anyway. I honestly have to wonder if anyone is even reading her posts. I’m certainly not the only one who noticed this, and I’m definitely not the first to point out a post where a troll was explicitly making excuses for violence. How many other people on this forum saw that and just stayed silent?

None of those other deleted posts—which weren't mine, by the way, since I only dropped two comments there yesterday—contained any off-topic nonsense or trolling, at least from what I could gather. They were nothing more than straightforward commentary on the episode airing on CNN. Those posts were perfectly fine because they were strictly focused on discussing the events and characters within the show.

Those posts were deleted, but let’s be real—they were pure trolling. They were flagged, and there was a whole detailed explanation right there in the thread explaining exactly how it was a troll job. Even the moderator, Jay, stepped in with a warning explicitly stating that we were dealing with a troll. The reason they weren't wiped clean? Because once again, it’s all about Michael Ramos4. (If I’m misremembering the specifics, my apologies, but it is glaringly obvious here that this troll is being protected.)

Moderator Jay actually did his job today on this thread by issuing two warnings, but then I noticed that moderator Adam went ahead and wiped out his first warning. To make matters worse, she followed that up by deleting his actual posts, which were perfectly fine. It’s honestly baffling to me how one moderator looks at something and sees grounds for deletion, while another moderator views the exact same thing as completely acceptable. 😕.

They’ve gone ahead and wiped out posts that weren't even controversial, and after having several whole pages of content, we're left with barely two. It's like watching someone take a sledgehammer to a library just because they didn't like one book on the shelf; suddenly, an entire archive of discussion has been reduced to nothing. 😲Honestly, I’m completely at a loss when it comes to these kinds of moves. I truly don't wrap my head around the logic here—what is the point of deleting posts that are perfectly fine and follow all the rules? It feels totally arbitrary.

The trolling has been completely out of hand, and despite these posts being reported repeatedly, there’s still zero reaction from the moderators. It’s like shouting into a void. Even though it is beyond obvious to anyone with eyes that this is nothing but pure, unadulterated trolling, the reports just seem to vanish into thin air. We're talking about these specific posts:
Just trolling—this wasn't actually shown in the series, and if you want the full breakdown, I’ve already laid out the explanation in the thread dedicated to that specific post.
Just trolling—that wasn't even shown in the series.
Just trolling and going off-topic.
Just trolling—and honestly, that’s not even how it was portrayed.
-trolling (explained in this thread)

How on earth can those trolling posts I listed above stay up? It’s because Michael Ramos4 teamed up with another troll on the thread!

All these trolling posts are being treated as legitimate contributions and left untouched despite multiple reports, yet everyone else’s posts are being wiped out without any justification. I honestly cannot wrap my head around how this censorship works. The only thing that comes to mind is that River simply refuses to agree with those specific posts.

Furthermore, if anyone else tries to troll—and isn't posting under River's handle—their posts get nuked immediately. So why are River's trolls allowed to stay? It makes zero sense to me because we aren't talking about a difference of opinion here; it's pure, unadulterated trolling, plain and simple.

I am certain that if you actually looked at the deleted content, you’d see how completely irrational this mass deletion is. There was nothing wrong with those posts; they weren't trolling, they weren't off-topic, they weren't insulting, and they weren't provocative. They were strictly discussing what happened in yesterday's episode and nothing else.
How can describing an event or a character from the show be considered "off-topic"?! 😲 😕 Because apparently, that's why those posts were deleted.
Posts are vanishing within a minute or two of being written, even when they are directly about the show's plot. And just like Sam Ramirez81 pointed out, even posts where the user doesn't quote anyone else are being scrubbed. Are we not even allowed to do that anymore?

Look, I have absolutely nothing against having a different perspective. On the threads I've participated in regarding AFK, we’ve always been able to exchange opposing views without a single fight breaking out. But here, where there is blatant trolling, that's impossible. This whole situation is completely dysfunctional.

As for the warnings, I have to side with goldenfalcon7. It feels like we aren't allowed to reply to anyone or comment on dissenting opinions without facing a ban 🙄. Meanwhile, troll River can do whatever she wants.

It baffles me how a troll is still permitted to post when it was stated loudly and clearly in the previous PZK thread that THIS PERSON IS TROLLING IN 90% OF THEIR POSTS!!
If you follow the logic, the moderators on that thread essentially allowed 90% of invalid posts to remain active without penalizing the troll, and now that same troll is back, posting the exact same nonsense without any consequences.

There is no point in participating in a thread like that anymore, and lately, nobody wants to post there because of this troll and the uncontrolled deletions. The troll is achieving exactly what they want: driving people away from the discussion. How much longer is this going to be tolerated?

It’s become obvious that River creates chaos in every single thread she touches, and surely that should be enough to shut down her 90% trolling streak once and for all. What is eventually going to be the breaking point? Will it be a string of 100% trolling posts, or something even worse? 😕 🤷

I am in full agreement with everything Sam Ramirez81 and goldenfalcon7 have written.

Michael Ramos4 didn't promote violence—honestly, they did the exact opposite. But hey, if you’re really convinced they did, why don't you go ahead and quote the "Protection Act for Imaginary Characters"? You know, that totally real law that definitely exists?

If someone is actually out here cheering for the wolf to die in Little Red Riding Hood, am I going to pull out the Animal Protection Act and quote it at them? Honestly, if they’re really that twisted, maybe I should!

Since you’re clearly so invested in this, why don't you head over to the Suljin topic and report every single post where someone suggests throwing fish at one of the characters? Don't go running to the moderators or the cops—just go straight to the source.

cosmicorca5 said:First point, but ☕.
That "opinion" is nothing more than a blatant lie, just like the example you provided yourself earlier; she’s fabricating events that never actually happened, so how is she allowed to do that?
There is a massive gulf between forming an opinion based on what you’ve actually seen on screen—commenting on whether someone likes a certain development or not—and straight-up inventing scenarios out of thin air to justify hating or loving something that isn't even there.
The others who don't like Feriha aren't spinning yarns or spreading falsehoods. Twisting words and outright lying are two very different things, as far as I'm concerned. 🤷
I honestly don't get why my questions are being ignored. 🤷

It would be wonderful if all those troll-like posts from Michael Ramos4 were wiped clean instead of just sitting there (though I wouldn't hold my breath). ☕Trolling is eating up a massive amount of pages in this thread; how is this permitted without any consequences, and why is it still being tolerated?

Second point: they're allowed to do it, but where exactly aren't we? 😕 Seriously, we aren't even allowed to reply to people who disagree with us—which is exactly what you admitted earlier—otherwise, we'll get banned. Why is that the case? 😕

Aha, just like that! She lied. So, regarding this whole "twisting the facts" nonsense—since it’s already been proven that isn't happening, let's actually talk about the fact that Fahr isn't twisting anything at all. Basically everything.. 😂

stormycrane3 said:First off, I want to say that I am fully behind the appeals and all the complaints being made. I honestly agree with everyone else on this forum who has shared their thoughts so far.

Dear and respected Larry Lee97, I don't think you quite realize that having differing opinions isn't actually the problem here. Of course they have a right to their views; nobody is disputing that. Everyone's perspective is respected and always welcome. If someone disagrees with something, they should point it out and, if possible, engage in a discussion about the why and how based on what we're actually seeing in the show. Just look at the posts from Dana Booth26 and Jerry Campbell7. Why don't we have any issues with them? They write great posts; they might not care for Feriha's character, but they maintain a lovely, polite style and a respectful way of writing.

Now, regarding Michael Ramos4. First of all, she doesn't just "not like" Feriha; she absolutely loathes her from the bottom of her soul, which she has made pretty clear in several posts. She just attacks and insults her without any actual basis (aside from lies). But hey, that's forgiven in the show itself. She twists the facts presented in the series (!), lies, tells untruths, and invents entire plotlines that don't exist. She simply refuses to see (or rather, chooses not to see) anything good or positive about Feriha. It seems like she's blinded by this senseless hatred, even though the show makes it crystal clear that FERIHA IS AN UNSPOILED, HONEST, INCREDIBLY GOOD AND COMPASSIONATE, FRAGILE GIRL WITH A HEART OF GOLD. (Setting aside those initial lies, of course.)
Even when Feriha does something kind, it's somehow framed as a mistake. In Michael Ramos4's case, no matter how you spin it, Feriha is always wrong and blamed for everything, even things that aren't true. Honestly, if that isn't trolling, I don't know what is...
Seriously, if you only read her posts, you'd think Feriha had committed a massacre or killed hundreds of people. Like she's some kind of terrorist or something. 🙄
So, how are we supposed to ignore posts like that? Really, how?

😂

It’s crystal clear—if you claim you don't like Feriha, you're obviously just trolling.
I’m honestly shocked you didn't mention that she actually said Feriha doesn't even wash her hair! I mean, how does she have the nerve to say something like that? 😂 ROFL
You clearly have no clue what we're even talking about.

Dana Nelson said:I want to address this specific part.

We weren't calling you out—it was actually the exact opposite.

The rest of us on the forum actually pointed you out as a perfect example of someone we disagree with, yet still value because you actually contribute to the discussion and are always welcome here.

If you actually take a second to read our posts properly, you'll see we're mentioning you in a positive light.

Don't let certain people talk you into believing we have anything against you.

Look, I'm right there with you regarding Levent Vegetić—I love him, others don't, and yeah, I get heat for it, but it's all within the bounds of a normal conversation. 😂

Just don't go comparing yourself to people who aren't even in the same league as you.

Sending you big hugs, dear. 🙂

So, you think you're the one deciding who gets to walk through the door around here? Who exactly do you think you are, playing gatekeeper? 🙏

---
I honestly don't know when they started allowing people to open threads just to talk about other forums, but this multi-day shouting match over on the River has become, quite frankly, absolutely disgusting.

The ladies on this forum are acting so incredibly offended, practically begging for some kind of intervention or protection just so they can obsess over some fictional character in peace—all while simultaneously hurling these disgusting accusations and blatant lies at someone who isn't even a real person! It’s honestly pathetic. 🙏 🤣

Warren Buffett, Jovanovic, hate speech, that old hag, inciting violence against women, the Penal Code... Fahr's post was actually solid and really heartfelt. Honestly, if anyone disagrees with her, they shouldn't even be living in this society.

driftingmarlin4 said:

Well, I think we already said our goodbyes. 🤣

Alright then, let's go for one more round...

driftingmarlin4 said:No, it just proves you aren't even part of this conversation, which basically means you're just trolling. Peace. ☕

And honestly? This just proves that in your head, anything that disagrees with your little opinion is automatically "trolling."

Later.

driftingmarlin4 said:slytinker11, oh, my bad, I guess you probably caught all of that since you're always reading and posting on the Netflix thread... or maybe it's just because you're BFFs with that one forum regular? 🥳☕

And why does that even matter? So you can try to take my words personally through some cheap ad hominem attack? 🥳

Of course I caught everything—I follow my BFF's entire saga.

Michael Ramos4 said:I am not a victim and I am not trolling... everything I say is right there in my comments and here on the FBI forums... I don't see a problem. I have my own opinions and I'm not changing them... not on this thread, and not on any other threads I've been part of.

I honestly don't get the issue... I have plenty of people who agree with me or think similarly, and they support my views, which you can clearly see from the posts both here and on the FBI boards... so where's the problem? I can fix my typos... but I can't change my opinion... because then I'd be writing things I don't actually believe. I think I've posted enough to show how I think, and there are others out there who feel the same way. I'm not the only one on this thread who doesn't share the majority view.
I enjoy the show too and love commenting on it... if someone doesn't like my take or how I see the series... that's not my problem... and it's not my problem if people get tired of calling me a troll. If my writing is the issue... fine, I won't write. Unless the rules say only people who agree can post on this topic.
I don't know what else to say... we didn't all agree on other threads either regarding what we saw in shows or our opinions... and nobody called me a troll then... I held the same kind of stance then as I do now... about certain characters... some I liked, some I hated... just like with any soap opera. I haven't changed in the last year.

The real issue here is that you didn't even bother appealing those three completely irrelevant warnings Jack slapped on you the last time he kicked you to the curb.

He basically decided your opinion, your stance, and your entire way of speaking counted as trolling. And once you hit that first, third, or eighth strike... suddenly everything you say is "trolling."
It’s getting to the point where people aren't even allowed to have a circular thought process without being flagged. 🤣

But hey, that’s just how forum life works, right? It has to be this way. 😂

I guess I totally missed the window when the forum opened up its hunt for trolls again. 🤔

And seriously, if 90%—I’m dying to know what math he used to get that number, by the way—of your posts are labeled as trolling, yet you don't even have 2,000 posts under your belt, then they clearly aren't doing their jobs very well.

On top of the subtle insults and the patronizing tone, it's pretty obvious from that last paragraph that something else is brewing.

Because you won't even give Frank a like. 😂

OMG. 🙂