CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Michael Diaz4 › Posts

Posts by Michael Diaz4

796 posts shown.

Office meltdown in Psychology & Therapy ·
hiddenstag said:To be honest, I’m at a loss for how to handle my own rage. I’ve always been one of those people who, once I set my mind to something, I see it through to the end. If things don't go according to plan, my first instinct is usually to go off on someone. I’ve actually climbed quite high in my career, and I hold a pretty senior management position now. But what really gets under my skin—what I struggle with most—is seeing people half-ass their jobs or just totally slack off. It throws me completely out of whack, and I feel like I lose all control. There are moments where I just want to smash everything in sight, and it takes me a long time to finally settle down.
I just don't know how to find some calm.

The truth is, you don't know how to handle yourself. At some point, you’re going to get fired, and honestly, it’s coming. Nobody is going to put up with your outbursts, and they certainly won't tolerate your attitude. You should probably walk away from that job before you completely blow it. Managers need to actually know their stuff—they need to understand the production tech or the core business, and more importantly, they need to know how to lead people. You have to be able to make the best of any situation. This primitive behavior of yours, this breaking of things? It’s only going to come back to haunt you. Once the executives or the owners see that productivity is tanking because of your incompetence and your temper, it's over. If people are being disrespectful, they’ll keep pushing until someone stops them, and mark my words, this is the beginning of the end for you at that company. You’d be better off leaving with your head held high while you still can...👎☕
F1: Then vs. Now in Formula 1 ·
silvercobra68 said:Hold on, are you actually trying to act like an expert here or something?

Look, we all know the fire extinguisher crushed his helmet and caused that horrific injury on the track, but you didn't mention any of that. I'm genuinely surprised.

Your knowledge is pretty thin.

I don't exactly write about everything. And as for that fire extinguisher... Hmm.🤔
F1: Then vs. Now in Formula 1 ·
It was actually quite good. I recall seeing a report back in a 1977 issue of *Car and Driver* about that plane crash—I honestly thought it was a helicopter at the time, but no, it wasn't. It was the one where Pace died. If my memory serves me right, he left behind his wife, Edna, and a little boy who was maybe six years old. That’s what sticks in my mind, though I don't have the magazine sitting in front of me right now. I can't be bothered to Google all the specifics, but the memory just surfaced...
F1: Then vs. Now in Formula 1 ·
Rebecca Fox4 said:Pace had his accident following the death of Tom Pryce during a race in South Africa.

I actually wrote that a couple of posts ago, but I botched the edit. Fixed it now. I had typed it out just minutes before you posted, then realized my mistake and updated it. Man, the years are really starting to catch up with me...
F1: Then vs. Now in Formula 1 ·
Found it. It was South Africa after all. Tom Pryce was the one who lost his life. People just tend to forget these things over time...
F1: Then vs. Now in Formula 1 ·
Well, I did a little digging online just now, and I can't find any mention of anyone actually losing their life during that 1977 race in Brazil. Pace had a nasty wreck back then, sure, but that’s about it. It was ages ago—I think I even used to collect old car magazines when I was younger. I’ll have to track down an old issue of *Car and Driver* from '77 to get the full rundown on that specific race. If I remember correctly, the Porsche 928 was being showcased at the Geneva Auto Show around that time, and I believe it was driven by someone like Dan Gurney.
F1: Then vs. Now in Formula 1 ·
stormyviper11 said:Carlos Pace died in a plane crash, not on the track. ☕

We could go on forever debating how much raw driving skill Lauda actually had. Sure, I’ll give you that he didn't look like much in his early days, but man, did he level up later on. It was mostly because of that gray matter in his head—he probably had more brains than all the other drivers from the seventies combined (well, maybe not counting Fittipaldi, who was pretty close in that department). 🙂 There’s this weird trend where people try to tear Lauda down specifically because of the things I actually respect about him. He wasn't some god-given natural talent or one of those "pure" racers who would kill anyone just to grab a win. But over time, he matured into a top-tier driver who made up for any gaps in pure speed by using his intellect, his work ethic, and his ability to organize the team he was driving for.

That doesn't change the fact that, statistically speaking, Emerson Fittipaldi was playing at the level of the all-time greats during the first half of his career. And honestly, if he hadn't let family and patriotic ties get in the way of his career choices—if he'd picked the right seats—he might have actually caught up to Fangio's championship count by the end of the seventies...

That's right, that was the last race Carlos drove. I just can't recall who passed away back then. Honestly, my memory is blank on what happened in 1977. I'm too lazy to Google it, but it might have been the US Grand Prix. Does anyone remember who died in that incident? 😵 I know Stuck managed to walk away from it relatively unscathed...
F1: Then vs. Now in Formula 1 ·
silvercobra68 said:Monaco wasn't '89, it was '88, and it wasn't Spa, it was Zolder—those are factual errors.

This post is riddled with logical fallacies; I won't even bother commenting, maybe tomorrow when I'm sober. Goodnight.

Fine, fine. I don't know why I swapped Zandvoort for Spa. Maybe I just wanted to spat😁. I was deep in thought about those legendary races at Spa, so I lost my way while typing, and the slip-up stayed there. And no, it definitely wasn't 1988, it was 1989. I am one hundred percent certain on that. Once you've sorted your facts out, we can talk...
F1: Then vs. Now in Formula 1 ·
silvercobra68 said:Look, I’m no kid, son. I could easily be your grandfather. Or at least some old geezer you'd want to avoid.

If you've been following this sub for a while, you might have noticed that I'm one of those rare users who almost always praises Prost. In my book, he’s arguably a more composed driver than even Ayrton Senna.

First off, that’s your take. Second, I remember Niki Lauda from back in the early 70s when he was young, arrogant, and—if I dare say so—actually quite bad. Look, the guy has guts; there’s no denying he pushed those March and BRM cars way past their limits. But let’s be real: if Jackie Stewart had stayed in F1, if François Cevert hadn't died, if Jochen Rindt hadn't been lost, and if Emerson Fittipaldi hadn't faded out, Niki would never have become what he is today. He’s just the one blade of grass left standing after the rest of the meadow has been mowed down.
Let’s run a quick thought experiment using Sergio Perez. Imagine a scenario where both Vettel and Hamilton are taken out of the equation—a totally plausible outcome given how things looked back in the 70s with drivers like Cevert, McLaren legends, or Rindt. Now, imagine Button sees a colleague go down and decides to walk away from racing entirely, much like Stewart did after Cevert’s accident. To top it off, let's say Alonso moves over to drive for a backmarker team, similar to how Fittipaldi went to drive for his brother Wilson. What does that leave us with? We end up with a powerhouse like Red Bull or McLaren picking up Perez. Does he snag two championships? Sure. But does that make him a better driver than Hamilton, Button, Vettel, or Alonso? Of course not. That’s exactly what I mean when I call Lauda a hypothetical version of Perez.

What else can I tell you? Look, there’s a massive difference between reading statistics, interpreting them, and actually living through it all firsthand. Back in 1972, when I was just a nineteen-year-old kid, I moved to America because the government here back then had basically stripped my family of everything we owned. My old man had to work for Union Pacific, waiting on trains and signaling them with those handheld flags. My mother spent her days working hard just to keep us afloat while I was growing up. I had two choices: spend my whole life as a low-level track worker and end up like some local drunk—who, mind you, comes from a pretty noble lineage, though that means nothing when the state decides to seize everything—or head out into the world to see what it’s all about. I started at the bottom, cleaning swimming pools for a service company. At the time, I didn't know a thing. I was just a simple guy who knew how to scrub moss off a liner; I barely even spoke English. But things shifted once my boss discovered my background. By 1974, he actually put me in charge of one of his companies—he owned several, and this one handled the cleaning supplies. Through him, I slowly began to understand how the world works. By 1975, I made my first trip to Indianapolis, and I was hooked. Some might wonder what a former pool cleaner could possibly know about American open-wheel racing. Well, it’s true, but it counts. My boss was a major figure within USAC, and one of his companies actively sponsored dirt, sprint, and midget car drivers throughout the 70s, along with several IndyCar entries. That’s how I got my foot in the door. I even met Emerson Fittipaldi when he came to drive CART, so I’ve actually stood face-to-face with men who went toe-to-toe with Niki Lauda. You can rest easy knowing I’m closer to the actual history and the people involved than you could ever imagine. There is plenty more to tell, but I’ll share it all in due time. Just do me a favor: don't call me "kid."

Best regards,👍🙂

Look, "grandpa," I’ve got plenty of years on me too, so you might be barking up the wrong tree here...😉 I have to disagree regarding Lauda. The way he drove was nothing short of pure fantasy. I haven't followed everything closely, but we definitely agree on Prost. Even Senna once remarked that Prost possessed a truly unique and superior technique for navigating corners. Do you remember that legendary race at Brands Hatch😁 back in the 80s—maybe '83 or '84—where he practically crossed the finish line on fumes? He had to wiggle the car left and right just to keep the engine fed, and then he pulled it off in those final meters... Those were the days. Real duels. As for Senna? I never really cared for him. He lacked a certain sharpness and tended to overcook it when he had a half-lap lead (just look back at Monaco in '89). It’s easy to win when you're sitting in the best car on the grid. Rindt was really a one-season wonder who flew under the radar. Now, the elder Villeneuve was much, much better. And do you remember who he collided with before his accident at Spa? I’ll never forget the footage of that shoe coming off. Then there was Pironi. That man was something else. If he hadn't broken, he would have been a world champion before meeting his end at sea in '87...
EDIT: It just occurred to me about Carlos Pace's death in '77. Von Stuck got caught out in the same spot where Pace went down. I loved watching Carlos; he was genuinely gifted. Such a shame he didn't make it. Von Stuck was a legend, sure, but his talent in the 70s never quite got the recognition it deserved...
Dealing with hemorrhoids in Health ·
Chloe Gomez6 said:The worst part for me is just not being able to wipe my butt like a normal person😢. It’s not even that it hurts or that I'm bleeding; I just want to grab some toilet paper and actually wipe properly instead of constantly dabbing at these hemorrhoids😢.

I just needed to vent a little☕.

Don't just wipe. You really have to wash up, and then you can dab at those hemorrhoids all you want afterward. Without washing and getting perfectly clean, you aren't going to get any relief...
F1: Then vs. Now in Formula 1 ·
silvercobra68 said:You guys are acting like absolute children. You don't understand anything. Formula 1 is moving forward, not backward. If you want vintage racing, there’s plenty of it—you’ve got the Silverstone classics, the Jim Clark memorial at Hockenheim, the traditional Monza races, or those classic Saturday morning sprints before the 24 Hours of Daytona. Watch those instead of whining about bringing the past back to F1.

But obviously, F1 is something else entirely. F1 is supposed to be cutting-edge technology—the kind of stuff that leaves you breathless when you see it. Just like it was thirty years ago. All those technical solutions you keep mentioning were actually the peak of technology back in their day.

And now, let's finally bust another myth. It isn't true that F1 was "better" back then than it is today. It wasn't better, and it wasn't worse; it was just different. Some things were worse, some were better. Let's break it down;

The 60s
1) Drivers had to drive with massive margins because the cars were fragile, and frankly, because they were terrified. People were dying back then.

2) There were no TV broadcasts and no onboard cameras (unless you count the footage from Frankenheimer’s *Grand Prix* film).

3) On the grid, you had about ten professionals and about ten amateurs—people like Guy Ligier, who was a hockey player, or even more unconventional types like Michael Parkes, who clawed his way into a seat after spending years as a Ferrari engineer.

4) Sometimes those amateurs were actually quite talented, like von Trips or the son of a pharmaceutical tycoon, Joakim Bonnier, who actually managed to snag a couple of Grand Prix wins.

5) The performance gaps between cars were massive. Races would end with only two or three cars in the same lap, while everyone else was two or more laps down. How can you expect any unpredictability? Critics would say the only real uncertainty was whether the Lotus would hold together; if it did, they’d win, if not, it would be a Brabham driver or someone like that—rarely some random guy.

The 70s

1) "Safety" becomes the main topic. After losing about fifty colleagues in the previous decade, drivers started striking, complaining, and boycotting races more frequently.

2) TV coverage still isn't really a thing, or if it is, it's just highlights on Sunday night or sometimes even Monday.

3) Drivers are still driving conservatively, even though wings and slicks made driving much easier. Overtaking happens, but not nearly as much as we imagine. There were a few fun drivers like Peterson or Villeneuve—but honestly, nothing more exciting than Hamilton.

4) The number of wealthy trust-fund kids grows, and some of them even take championships—one before the Nürburgring barbecue era, one after. During the barbecue year, the title goes to none other than a playboy.

The 80s

1) Politics. The war between the FIA and FOCA.

2) After a lull, the "Ecclestone-ization" of the sport begins.

3) A lot of races boil down to fuel management. McLaren dominates in '84 and '85 simply because they are the most efficient, while Brabham struggles. Prost takes his third title. And Piquet gets three too. Hmm... leaves a big question mark over the quality of the drivers.

4) We have TV coverage now. Murray does wonders, which is great, but we don't hear Murray; we hear some guy with a monotonous voice, saying "Piquet first, Prost second..."

So, that's how it was. If there are any more questions, just ask.

🤦 Lauda is a driver whose talent is debatable. If it weren't for Alain being such a powerhouse...🤦🙂
US Grand Prix 2010 in Formula 1 ·
Adam Chase41 said:Think we're looking at rain??

Doubt it...😢
US Grand Prix 2010 in Formula 1 ·
Jose Long4 said:I honestly think the rules were broken here, and even the FIA seems lost on what they're supposed to follow. It’s clear that Lewis Hamilton grabbed that pole position specifically because he was running empty—being light enough to fly in that final krug when he shouldn't have been...

I don't think he would have pulled it off if everything hadn't lined up exactly the way it did.
The rulebook states you MUST have at least one liter of fuel left in the tank at the end of qualifying. They need that sample to verify the fuel meets the specs...

That's how the regulations work. But obviously, they couldn't just pull a liter out of him since he showed up empty, so now what? It's a mess. Either he had an unfair advantage by being underweight, or it's just plain unsportsmanlike that the rules apply to everyone else but somehow don't apply to him...

Look at track and field. If an athlete goes for a doping test, they have to provide a sample. If they can't meet the requirements or provide the fluid within the timeframe, they lose their result and their ranking. The FIA should be doing the same thing, just through a different process. In this case, there was no fuel for the test, and on top of that, he completed a krug under Nevazec conditions that others simply didn't get. Though it looks like the FIA is choosing to look the other way...

For me, it’s a safe bet that "the first one on the grid won't be the winner" and we'll be seeing a Safety Car on track...

You've got a point. I'd add that the crowd favoring McLaren is acting just like they always do. To hell with the rules; they change them so constantly you can't even keep track anymore. Ideally, you shouldn't touch the regulations mid-season. If you do, then wins achieved under shifting conditions don't feel legitimate. This version of Formula 1 is becoming a caricature of itself—it's getting hard to watch...
Pros and Cons of Sebastian Vettel in Formula 1 ·
Up to this point, Sebastian Vettel has been the more successful driver, and I don't see that changing anytime soon. Let’s just be real—regardless of how much the OP might disagree, we have to face the facts. Sebastian Vettel is an elite talent, and now he just needs to seal that legacy with a world championship title...
Pros and Cons of Sebastian Vettel in Formula 1 ·
stormybadger8 said:exactly that 🙏
the same Rubens 🤣

He’s already eaten Jenson Button for breakfast. Give it a bit longer and he'll chew him up just like Rubens did back in the 2008 season, finishing with about four times the points. 👋

Are you actually aware of the reality here? By the next race, Sebastian Vettel is going to be leading Mark Webber by at least 7 points, and he'll be ahead of Button by at least 20. 🤣

Just some food for thought.

😁Ouch, you really cornered him there...👍😁
Pros and Cons of Sebastian Vettel in Formula 1 ·
silvercobra68 said:there’s nothing going on between us, absolutely nothing; those are just baseless insinuations😉. And hey, you can rest easy knowing we aren't going to include you in our circle, so don't worry about that much🤷

😕🤷 I don't quite follow, but honestly, it doesn't matter. It seems like you've already made up your mind on this one, so I won't ruin the flow of this discussion by dragging it out...☕
Pros and Cons of Sebastian Vettel in Formula 1 ·
silvercobra68 said:Exactly.🙂 I guess we're on the same page here.👍

Alright, then walk me through it. What's actually going on? Either you're pulling me into some inside joke I'm clearly missing out on, or things are getting a little too shady for my liking.☕
Pros and Cons of Sebastian Vettel in Formula 1 ·
Roger Wright94 said:That's for silvercobra68! 👍 I love this kind of clarity.

Am I missing something?😕 Some kind of weird chemistry...😁
Pros and Cons of Sebastian Vettel in Formula 1 ·
stormyviper11 said:What kind of question is that? Michael Schumacher, obviously. David Coulthard would be up there too, though he'd probably just make a joke out of it, whereas Juan Pablo Montoya would actually mean it.

😂
Pros and Cons of Sebastian Vettel in Formula 1 ·
silvercobra68 said:The patriots are getting worked up again. Big deal. What happens now? Are we about to get invaded by some foreign power too?🤣 😠

What are you even on?😕