CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Nancy Williams58 › Posts

Posts by Nancy Williams58

164 posts shown.

Is Jurica Pađen an artist? in Music ·
Kenneth Lee79 said:So tell me, is every single taste considered top-tier? Are there no losers on this planet? I’m thinking that’s what he meant, if I’m following his logic.

And if we aren't using his yardstick, whose should we use? Yours? Sure, art is subjective—it's not some hard science. But come on, are we really going to insult Johann Sebastian Bach, or try to put him on the same level as someone like Brena? If you go after that, someone's just gonna hit you with, "Well, your standard is your own definition of quality," or "You're confusing art with personal taste."

😉

It belongs to nobody; there’s no such thing as an objective scale. And honestly, saying someone's work is "insulting" is one of the dumbest things you can do. What does that even mean? In my book, any act of creating music is art. Period. Because to create or perform anything—no matter how it sounds—you have to put in the work. You need to know something about music, you have to know how to play, compose, arrange, sing, dance, you name it. Now, whether that finished product turns out to be good, bad, a hit, a flop, a masterpiece (for some), or total garbage (for others)—that's a completely different ballgame.

That first part is art; the second part is taste.

That's why I say it's a fundamental mistake when people equate "art" only with what they personally like or value, while dismissing everything else as non-art.

Why wouldn't Brena and her music be considered art, just like Bach's? Pop/folk music hits every single definition of musical art just as much as Bach or Mozart music does.

How does folk music not fit into this simplified definition? 🙂 Brena has all those elements, and so do Bach and Mozart.

Music is art expressed through sung and/or played tones, various sounds, noises, and the silence between them.
Is Jurica Pađen an artist? in Music ·
Jose Edwards16 said:When you look at his solo run, Lennon actually had some pretty gritty, heavy stuff. For example: I'm Losing you, I don't Wanna faca IT NY City, Nobody Told me, Cold Turkey, New York City...
On the exact same record where you get the softer vibes of Imagine and Yoko Ono, you’ve also got the punchy, aggressive Gimme som Truth.

Gimme som Truth
I'm Losing you
I don't Wanna faca IT NY City
New York City

Then there's this track that sounds mellow on the surface—The Luck of The Irish—but the lyrics are brutal. Lennon
is basically shouting about how the British are ravaging Ireland, ending it with lines like:
Why The Hell ara The English There anyway
as They kill with god on their side blam IT All on The Kids The Ira as The
as They kill with god on their side blam IT All on The Kids The Ira as The
as They kill with god on their side blam IT All on The Kids The Ira as The


Anyway, back in '72, Lennon and Yoko Ono dropped 'Sometime in New York,' which was loaded with political commentary.
Critics absolutely tore that album apart, but buried in there are gems like what I mentioned before or Woman is The Nigger of The World, where he calls out chauvinism and how women are treated:
Woman is The Nigger of The World

So yeah, that's enough about the "soft" Lennon.🍿

Man... you're really out here arguing with someone who thinks Lennon was just some one-hit wonder who coasted off 🙂Imagine and that if it weren't for Yoko Ono—who they claim gave him his entire platform—nobody would even know his name today. 🙂
Is Jurica Pađen an artist? in Music ·
Maybe the whole issue is just that you’re constantly mixing up "art" with "taste," while using your own personal idea of "quality" as the yardstick... which is honestly pretty lame and kind of childish
A new wave in Music ·
David Flores68 said:I'm pretty clueless when it comes to this era, both historically and musically, so I could really use some help getting up to speed on this stuff.

I'm watching this documentary about that era right now, and they're mentioning how The Dirty Theater wasn't exactly big fans of the regime back then. They claim this band and that band were always pushing back, but they don't actually get specific about what exactly they were protesting against.

Most musicians lean left, but when you're dealing with communism, there isn't really a "further left" to go. So what exactly was their problem with living in that kind of state?

Besides that, I know there were those student protests back then, so I’m curious—what exactly were the students complaining about? Since they were also pretty much "always left," what was their beef with?

I was watching that generation 68 documentary recently, and honestly, the whole movie only mentions what they were actually protesting against exactly ONCE. Some girl on TV said something along the lines of how they loved the social equality in the country, but the censorship and the surveillance were driving them crazy—if I remember that right.

So, what exactly were those New Wave musicians and college students railing against back then?

That’s just total nonsense—claiming he "didn't like the regime." 🙂 Back when they were dropping their albums in the late 70s, that whole "regime" thing wasn't even really a factor anymore—especially not by the 80s, because by then everything had basically swung wide open with total liberalization. Sure, you’re going to dig through those lyrics and find some critical jabs that people can interpret however they want, but that’s just what punk-rock bands do. That's literally how the roots of The Dirty Theater started. It doesn't matter if you're in an authoritarian state or a parliamentary democracy; punk is always going to have that social edge to it. It's just part of the deal.

The theater is just simple—smart, you have to admit—they basically rode the wave of the US breaking away, positioned themselves as a major brand within that whole context, and honestly, that’s pretty much it.

I mean, we're talking about an anti-establishment band here. 🙂 That probably just goes to show the fact that they recorded the whole Street Hero album over in Sweden, and their previous one, Black and White World, was done in Italy.

It’s such a joke—this whole setup where they let you wander the globe, soaking up inspiration and recording albums, only for some local label like Suzy to swoop in and release it under their thumb. It’s just business as usual for them in this system. 🙂

That’s probably how the whole regime just ended up tearing itself apart from the inside. 🙂

Look, if we actually sit down and look at the songs from black white world and really break down the lyrics, I don't see anything inherently anti-establishment there. It’s just not that deep.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_white_world
Is Jurica Pađen an artist? in Music ·
Even back in the day, trolls actually had some brains... nowadays they’re just straight-up morons, and they can't even manage to be stupid properly 🙂
What defines a "heavy" movie? in Movies ·
Honestly, I found Little Italy kind of a slog to get through. It wasn't even really about the plot or how it wrapped up, it was just that the whole movie is stuck in this heavy, depressing, totally hopeless vibe from the opening credits all the way to the end.
What defines a "heavy" movie? in Movies ·
Henry Campbell5 said:I can't stand music that lacks actual substance. If it actually has some value, I’d actually enjoy it instead of finding it boring.

Alright, look, this is just kind of a dumb way to put it. Because it basically makes it sound like the only thing with any "value" is whatever music you happen to like. It’s like you're saying your own personal taste is the ultimate yardstick for what matters.🙂

I'm guessing you just phrased it poorly.
What defines a "heavy" movie? in Movies ·
Nobody even brought up City of God... That movie is an absolute emotional wrecking ball.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0317248...1?ref_=nv_sr_1
What defines a "heavy" movie? in Movies ·
Sandra Harris2 said:Hmm...
It absolutely wrecked me emotionally, but man, it’s a masterpiece—Incendies.

Look, I watched it. Yeah, it's a solid movie, but maybe I just lost the thread? I feel like they messed with the timeline in a really messy way. It didn't click for me, and honestly, it felt like they were just playing tricks to get that "wow" factor, you know? Like, if you just ignore certain parts and stop overthinking it, sure, it works... but still.
What defines a "heavy" movie? in Movies ·
Honestly, this was one of the most deeply uncomfortable things I’ve ever sat through.

Just a quick little flick about murder.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0095468/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1
What defines a "heavy" movie? in Movies ·
From what I've seen, people usually mean one of two things when they call a movie "heavy." The older crowd tends to use it as a catch-all for anything with "heavy" subject matter. It doesn’t necessarily mean the viewing experience itself is grueling; it just means it's some kind of intense, heavy-hitting drama. Then you've got the younger generation, who mostly use the term to describe that visceral, gut-wrenching feeling you get while watching—which, let's be real, is totally subjective. But yeah, the themes are still heavy. Take Funny Games (both versions), for instance. Or if you want a perfect example of that specific type of movie, look at in The Bedroom.
Hellboy (2019) in Movies ·
briskbison55 said:Perlman just isn't Hellboy to me. I grew up obsessed with those comics, so seeing those movies was a total letdown—it felt like everything Del Toro touches is basically just made for kids.

Perlman isn't even Hellboy anymore.
Cold Pursuit (2019) in Movies ·
Honestly, if you ask me, Liam Neeson could basically ride this wave until he retires. Even if he only lands a solid hit every third or fourth movie, I’m totally fine with that. As long as he occasionally drops a genuinely great flick—like A Walk Among the Tombstones, which was killer but way too underrated—it’s all good in my book.

Looking at the trailer, I don't know... it feels like a bit of a departure from his usual style. It’s giving me those Guy Ritchie vibes, you know? Maybe the trailer is just playing tricks on us, though.

I mean, honestly, what else are you going to expect when Neeson kicks things off by saying, "I'm just a regular guy"? It’s basically just him leaning into the self-parody at this point. 🙂 I'm expecting a good movie...
Taylor Gray5 said:I wouldn't say they're some underground act or anything. I mean, they're constantly dropping Top 10 albums (they've even hit #1 here in the States), they've racked up a bunch of Grammy nods, and you see them mentioned everywhere, not just on niche rock sites but basically any major music outlet out there...

Sure, that’s true if you actually pay attention to music. But looking at the big picture? If you went out and polled a hundred random people on the street and asked if they'd ever heard of them, I highly doubt the percentage of "yes" answers would be that high.
Concert Announcements - Archive in Music ·
Nice, nice. Foo Fighters, the US, Madison Square Garden, NYC

https://www.rollingstone.com/music/large-concert-announcements/
The Truth (Presidential Game) in Movies ·
feraltiger11 said:The movie is solid, and you can totally "smell" that the plot was inspired by some actual real-life drama. But man, I just don't get the ending... basically, DuBois, Rachel, and her lawyer go into this interrogation room where he threatens the accused with a massive sentence if she doesn't cough up her source. The deal on the table is a two-year stint. Then we hit the epilogue—two years later—and we get this flashback where Rachel remembers being a little kid in preschool, and
Erica's daughter told her that her mommy works for the Government. So, try to wrap your head around what the actual twist is here.

Look, the whole point wasn't really about the article itself. The real issue was outing a CIA agent, which turns this into a major national security nightmare. The actual writing matters way less than that.

It was two years in prison, since DuBois wouldn't budge on the plea deal. At that point, once he realized he was never getting what he wanted, his only goal was to bury her. To me, it felt like he took it personally. He was just pissed he didn't get his way, so he went after the maximum punishment even when he shouldn't have. It became a grudge match.

As for why she made her choice in the end? I saw it in a much more grounded way. She refused to name the source because it involved a child—plus, she’s a mom herself now. That’s the kicker. She couldn't drag a kid into the mess, and honestly, she probably couldn't live with the guilt of using a child to cover her own tracks. It's like a mix of maternal instinct and a guilty conscience. If you ask me, part of her choosing prison was her way of punishing herself for the damage she caused in the first place.
Who is your favorite Glam Rock band? in Music ·
analoggull52 said:you're right, she used to dress more like a classic rocker—black leather pants, jackets, all that—but personally, I’ve always felt she fit right into that Glam rock vibe

That's because it wasn't just about the clothes. See, Glam rock was really about this whole over-the-top, theatrical persona. Sure, the outfit is the main thing, but there's more to it than just what you wear. That's why I put her in that category.

Look, I’ve never heard anyone group Bon Jovi into that genre. People usually slap them in the hair metal or hair hard-rock camp, but never glam rock. By the time Bon Jovi blew up, that whole glam rock movement had pretty much moved on—that was more of a 70s thing. At least, that's how it played out for me.
Peter Reed70 said:Just watched the trailer, looks pretty solid! From what I can tell, they’re definitely gonna paint Bush as the total villain of the story.

Paint him as a villain? 🙂Just show him for who he actually was. A jerk. They don't even need to make stuff up.
Peppermint (2018) in Movies ·
I don’t know about you guys, but the guy who directed The Gunman shouldn't be allowed to direct anything ever again—not even a damn commercial for pads. Honestly. But hey, maybe the dude was just high out of his mind during filming.
Tully (2018) in Movies ·
I don't know what to tell you about Fleur Amour. It’s one of those things where people try to make it sound all high-end and sophisticated, but honestly? It feels like they're just selling you a fancy label and hoping you don't notice the substance isn't actually there. It's like buying a designer shirt from a big department store in New York that looks great on the mannequin, but the second you put it on, you realize the stitching is cheap and it's going to fall apart after two washes. It's all vibes and no grit. People get caught up in the aesthetic, thinking that if it looks polished, it must be premium. But I've always been a bit more skeptical of stuff that tries that hard to look "perfect." Real quality doesn't usually need to scream it from the rooftops with such a curated, artificial persona. Just my two cents. kaže:
Just finished watching it—solid flick. As expected, Charlize Theron absolutely kills it. Honestly, I’ve gotta tip my hat to her; she goes through all that weight gain just to nail a role, and she’s done it more times than I can count. Respect.
The way they staged those scenes—showing her totally spiraling under the pressure of juggling the kids and all that endless housework—was honestly spot on. It really hammers home that whole American social divide, too. You’ve got this glaring gap between the people who have everything handed to them and everyone else just trying to keep their heads above water. It’s clearly playing out through the contrast between her family and her brother’s family, showing how differently they're navigating that middle-class grind.

Heads up: spoilers ahead.

It’s just a bummer, honestly. They totally botched the whole dynamic with her son—there's clearly something going on there, but they keep it so vague it's frustrating. Is it ADHD? Some other disorder? Who knows, because they won't tell you. And don't even get me started on the whole thing with her doppelgänger, Tully. It was such a tired cliché, that whole "I've had enough" moment where she decides to head out and get absolutely trashed. Like, we saw that coming from a mile away. Too predictable. Then you've got Marlo, who spends the entire night acting like a total maniac in Tully's role, yet somehow wakes up looking perfectly refreshed, like she just had a solid eight hours of sleep. It makes zero sense. Also, that scene where Tully puts on a waitress outfit and jumps on Marlo's husband? Total WTF moment. Seriously, any normal guy would be terrified if some random woman tried to slide into his bed like that. 😁 Something about this whole night nanny story just feels off to me. Like, I don't know, the math isn't mathing. It honestly smells like someone just made the whole thing up from scratch.

I’d give it a solid 7/10.

Solid flick. Honestly, I’d probably land on the same rating myself.

Just to circle back on that point you made about what makes this bad—I don't see why revealing the core mystery is necessary. Why even bother? The movie doesn't explicitly lay it all out anyway. And that whole "fresh and well-rested" vibe? Yeah, pass. A good movie should mess with your head, playing those little mind games while it unfolds. That’s just how cinema works, in my book. I will give you one thing, though—that drinking scene was definitely a bit cliché.

And that whole thing you’re saying about your husband—look, let's be real here. It's not like some random woman just swooped in and stole his attention out of nowhere. 🙂