CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Noah Roberts46 › Posts

Posts by Noah Roberts46

605 posts shown.

Golden Globes 2021 in Movies ·
Borat is hilarious when you're some kid in high school, but honestly, that kind of humor just doesn't land for me anymore.
Golden Globes 2021 in Movies ·
Honestly, it wouldn't be a shocker if Borat didn't pick up anything given how much hype there was. 😬

But yeah, Alexander Hamilton just isn't hitting those heights. It feels like people are genuinely losing interest in the Golden Globes and the Oscars—you can see it clearly in the ratings.
The Wizard of Oz (1939) in Movies ·
I watched that movie for the first time about a year ago. It was a total letdown—honestly, I found it incredibly dull and could barely make it to the end. 🤷
The Little Things (2021) in Movies ·
Not bad. It’s been way too long since we’ve seen a decent serial killer flick. Anyone got any solid recommendations before this one actually hits theaters?
What's Eating Gilbert Grape? (1993) in Movies ·
silvercobra4 said:To was just overacting. There’s no way he deserved an Oscar, just like how Tommy Lee Jones (who is great in The Fugitive, regardless) took it home that year. Ralph Fiennes (Schindler's List) got robbed, much like Al Pacino for The Godfather 2. It was an unforgettable performance and just more proof that the Oscars can be a total joke.

+1
The Greatest Showman (2017) in Movies ·
I just watched it recently, and honestly, it wasn't half bad. The soundtrack didn't really do it for me, though—La La Land is still on a completely different level.
What did you guys think of Mank? in Movies ·
ruggedjackal46 said:The movie isn't total garbage. Mankiewicz is an entertaining character, Oldman delivers a solid performance, and the black-and-white cinematography actually works since the whole story is anchored in that mythic era of old Hollywood. But will I still be thinking about this film in a week? No. Mankiewicz's story should have been a deep dive into how Hollywood pivoted from free-spirited creatives to a corporate machine driven by big business and high-stakes politics—showing how art became a tool for political campaigns and how a legendary screenwriter ended up a marginalized outcast. But trying to elevate the narrative like that felt thin and ultimately failed. On one hand, the Hollywood elites are underdeveloped caricatures, and on the other, Mankiewicz himself lacks any real tragic depth. The guy was just a sarcastic smoker before Kane, during Kane, and after Kane; nothing really changed. By the end, the movie just boils down to two hours of Gary Oldman throwing out cynical lines, drinking, and writing effectively. Sure, it makes for fun viewing, but there was so much more potential here.

The dynamic with Welles could have been much more interesting and fleshed out, but I suspect they cut that part because they couldn't find a decent actor to play Welles. Tom Burke looks the part, but he doesn't have an ounce of that charisma.

Agreed. That’s basically my take as well. It could have been better, but regardless, it’s an engaging film. I enjoyed the dialogue, the acting, and the visuals. 👍
X vs Y in Soccer ·
Reus is hanging in there by a thread, but after three or four elite seasons, you really shouldn't even be having this debate.
X vs Y in Soccer ·
How on earth is Insigne even being ranked above Reus? Even with one leg (which, let's be honest, has been most of his career), Reus is the superior player, and don't even get me started on when he was actually at his peak.
X vs Y in Soccer ·
Fair enough. 👍

Joao Felix vs Mbappe

Honestly, I feel like Mbappe has been a bit overrated lately; he really let us down in those big Champions League matches, especially during last year's final. That said, what he’s managed to achieve by age 21 is nothing short of insane. He’s still arguably the top talent on the planet right now, and I wouldn't be surprised if his career trajectory mirrors C. Ronaldo. They actually share a lot of similarities—neither of them possesses that effortless finesse you see with Messi. As for Felix, I think he might have that same potential, but he just doesn't have the physical presence required right now. Whether he ever develops it remains to be seen. Still, they are definitely the two biggest talents of this generation.
Hakimi vs Andy Robertson

Ederson vs Allison

Goretzka
vs Veratti

Lukaku vs Lewandovski

Ramos
vs Bonucci

Insigne vs Reus

Pogba vs Thiago Alcantara

Sterling vs Sancho
In my opinion, Sancho is already the technically superior player; he simply possesses a level of football intelligence that Sterling will never reach. If he polishes a few more things, he'll be unstoppable.
Rebić vs Vlašić
X vs Y in Soccer ·
ruggedjackal46 said:Look, Silva was arguably the standout performer at Monaco (back when they made that deep run in the LP) and then again at Manchester City (specifically during that season when de Bruyne was sidelined). He might be struggling for form lately, but he sustained that elite level for much longer than Fernandes has spent being productive at Manchester United. Plus, you have to consider versatility; Silva can slot in as a winger, a second striker, or a midfielder, while Fernandes is pretty much strictly a number ten.

The problem is, Silva has always been surrounded by world-class talent and highly organized squads; he’s never had to carry the entire weight of a team on his back. On the flip side, Fernandes has essentially dragged Manchester United through their Champions League campaigns even when they were massive underdogs. Even this season, while the team's play has been absolutely pathetic, he’s still delivering enough to keep them within reach of the top 4 (if they pull off a win in that rescheduled match, they're back in). I just don't see Silva being capable of pulling off that kind of heavy lifting. And if you look at the numbers, no midfielder has had a better start in the EPL; since he arrived, he's racked up 15 goals and 11 assists in 24 games. Aside from KDB, he's likely the player creating the most chances.

Don't get me wrong, Silva is a fantastic team player and I have zero doubt he'll find his rhythm again. But strictly speaking? I still think Fernandes is the superior individual talent.
X vs Y in Soccer ·
Kante vs Fabinho

That’s where the issue lies. Right now, even Fabinho is struggling, but if I’m looking at their entire careers, I’d have to go with Kante.

Mane Son vs Son

It’s the exact same situation as what was mentioned above.

Ter Stegen vs Ter Stegen

Mahrez vs Coman

Mahrez just wasn't the same after his time with the Foxes. On the other hand, Coman has finally found his groove at Bayern Munich.

James vs Grealish Grealish

Bruno Fernandes
Bernarda Silva

For those who actually voted Silva over Bruno, I’m genuinely curious: what exactly makes him better? Right now, we’re looking at a rotation player versus someone who is easily sitting in the top 3 or 4 players in the EPL this season—one of the best to ever step foot in this league, period. Look, maybe Silva is in a slump, fine. But even at his absolute peak, he just didn't offer the level of productivity that Bruno brings to the table. Sure, he might make fewer passing errors and look a bit more "polished" technically, but let's be real: that's largely a byproduct of the team's playing style.

Upamecano de Ligt Isco vs Coutinho

Isco de Ligt Isco vs Coutinho

Marquinhos vs Varane

Rashford
versus Werner

As for that last pair, I'm not entirely sure. Looking at the numbers, my gut leans toward Werner, but honestly? BL. iskreno, I haven't followed much outside of this season with Chelsea FC. From what I can see here, he doesn't really hold an edge over Rashford, so my take is purely based on fan sentiment. ☕
Neil Armstrong (1999) in Movies ·
Finally finished watching it. I didn't know much about Kaufman before this, but man, this movie really hit home. What an underrated genius. 🙏

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Mhv...tlingRambles89

Lawler tells a great story about what went down on set. 🤣
What did you guys think of Mank? in Movies ·
The reviews are looking solid. It hits theaters this Friday. 🙂
The Midnight Sky (2020) in Movies ·
It feels a little pathetic and leans a bit too hard into that Interstellar vibe. But hey, we'll see how it plays out.
What did you guys think of Mank? in Movies ·
What kind of movies are you guys into lately?

Look, this isn't some mobster flick, but I honestly don't get why people react with such pure disdain toward black-and-white films. Don't get me wrong—I usually prefer color too—but for certain movies, black-and-white just works better. At least, it does for me.
What did you guys think of Mank? in Movies ·
Look, this definitely isn't a movie for everyone—especially not for today's crowds who only care about mindless action, superheroes, and cheap, low-brow comedies.
What did you guys think of Mank? in Movies ·
Man, this looks incredible, especially given the cinematography.
Kitbag (202*) in Movies ·
It would be fantastic to see a high-quality biopic about Napoleon. I have no doubt that Joaquin Phoenix would absolutely kill it, but I’m genuinely terrified of what a drunk Scott might do with this. He had Bale on his side and still managed to completely tank Exodus...
I actually really enjoyed this one. I’ve always had a soft spot for anything written by Aaron Sorkin, even if he does tend to lean into that heavy-handed sentimentality right at the end. Regardless, it was a fascinating story that I wasn't familiar with before. The acting was incredible—honestly, the cast is absolutely stacked.