That's exactly my point! Since Sauber is becoming BMW, we won't have 11 teams next season—it'll be down to 10 (check the first post!).
Hold on a second—what "new" team? BMW and Williams are splitting up, and BMW just bought Sauber to rename them BMW... there isn't a new team entering the grid at all.
I voted for the changes because, honestly, I can't deal with this single-lap nonsense anymore. We should give the new rules a fair shake first—if they turn out to be a disaster, then we can always go back to the 12-lap format.
I think you might have missed the mark there—if we went with just one lap, the five slowest drivers would be out immediately...
Look, I’ve honestly never seen someone post such absolute nonsense on IMDb before. It’s almost a relief to know nobody actually thought this was a troll post.
My biggest fear is that some producer might actually stumble upon this and think, "Hey, that’s a brilliant idea—let's greenlight it."
I'm actually looking for this, but I can't quite remember where I saw it—searching through the IMDb forums is honestly like digging through a coal mine.
Apparently, Atkinson is working on a new Blackadder set in the 60s—but I actually stumbled upon some info about this American project over on IMDb. I’ll have to dig around a bit more to track down the exact link...
Steve Martin has clearly decided to go all out just to prove that British comedy beats the American style any day—first he’s playing Blackadder in an American remake, and now he wants to channel his inner Sellers... 👎
I've always been a huge fan of Sellers—but honestly, I had no clue he was such a "character." I somehow always pictured him as this incredibly mature, private individual. That said, the direction and the whole concept are brilliant, though the real standout is Geoffrey Rush; he captures some of those Sellers roles so perfectly it’s actually a little eerie. 🙏 🙏 🙏 I've never seen such a striking resemblance between an actor and a real-life figure from Stone's Doors. Still, it's absolutely worth a watch, especially for any cinephiles out there. You'll get to see the origins of the Pink Panther and how Peter Sellers managed to outsmart Stanley Kubrick (you really have to tip your hat to him for that one), along with some behind-the-scenes footage from Dr. Strangelove.
My only gripe might be the last twenty minutes or so—it feels a bit diluted and loses its edge—but it's nothing major. The film is excellent, and the soundtrack is just wonderful. 👍
Are you talking about that scene on the plane? That's one of those moments that gives you actual cramps from laughing so hard. Oh, and I forgot to mention the soundtrack—it is simply phenomenal! 👍
I actually managed to snag an invite to the gala premiere—since my buddy couldn't make it—so we basically gorged ourselves on chocolate like there was no tomorrow. The hostesses were literally ushering us in, and to top it off, we even scored a goody bag stuffed with even more chocolate...
The movie is fantastic; I thought the book was brilliant too, but I honestly think they did a stellar job with the adaptation. Even those flashbacks involving Wonka's father (which weren't in the book) actually fit the flow quite nicely...
The Life and Death of Peter Sellers is a biopic based on the book of the same name. As the title implies, it’s all about the life of Peter Sellers. Beyond his legendary filmography, the movie dives into the lesser-known corners of his existence—his relationship with his mother, his private struggles, and his rather chaotic lifestyle. It spans roughly three decades, starting with his radio heyday on > and his early attempts to break into cinema, finally closing out with the filming of >, a project that was incredibly close to his heart.
The film can be a bit disorienting; it blends comedy with heavy drama and even touches on psychedelic vibes—that heart attack scene, for instance.
> does a fantastic job channeling >, particularly when recreating those iconic roles (like > or >), and he brings a lot of depth to the performance. Honestly, the character recreations are some of the most entertaining parts of the movie—it's such a fun way to revisit his various personas and see how they were conceived.
Bottom line: if you’re a fan of > (like I am), you should definitely check this out—you'll likely enjoy it. I didn't know much about >'s personal life before this (other than the fact that he married a few times), so I can't say for sure how accurately that part is portrayed, but watching him as a man without a core identity—someone who is essentially "consumed" by his characters—is truly fascinating. It feels like everyone in his orbit was just another role playing alongside him while the world revolved entirely around his gravity. This is captured beautifully in the transitions where we see > dressed up as >'s father, his mother, or even >...
I honestly can't remember if I've ever actually sat through one of his movies, but some people claim he’s a bad actor—as if that's ever mattered in a James Bond film anyway.
We really don't need this. There was already a dedicated Hajduk Split thread back when I first started browsing here, and it’s been sitting dormant for nearly two years. Honestly, the existing threads are more than enough; we shouldn't just spawn a new one every single time a club hits a milestone.
If you ask me, that Inter Milan thread only popped up once San Francisco lost their shot at the top spot—which says a whole lot about those "fans" from the suburbs...
urbanhawk28 said:That movie was relevant a year ago—it should have been aired back then, if anyone had actually had the guts to do it. Now that everything mentioned in it has become common knowledge, showing it seems pointless, unless it's just to soothe the consciences of those TV executives.
A year ago, the film was still playing in theaters, and even ABC couldn't air it, no matter how much they might have wanted to.
nimbleskipper17 said:I have to admit, I expected a bit more given all the hype surrounding this. It’s an okay movie, sure—but when there's this much noise, you expect something truly groundbreaking or shocking. Instead, it just shows us the other side of the coin; nothing we hadn't already suspected or known.