Posts by redbadger26

Uploaded with Imgur Uploaded with Imgur

Nicholas Lee28 said:I just got my blood work back; here are the results:

RBC: 6.14H 10e12/L (4.34-5.72)
Hemoglobin 171 g/L (138-175)
Hematocrit 0.519 L/L (0.415-0.530)
Platelets 210 10e9/L (158-424)
MCV 84.0 fL (83.0-91.2)
MCH 27.8 pg (27.4-33.9)
MCHC 329 g/L (320-345)
MPV 8.3 fL (6.8-10.4)
RDW 11.2 % (9.0-15.0)

WBC 7.6 10e9/L (3.4-9.7)

Lymphocytes 24.3 % (20.0-46.0)
Monocytes 9.2 % (2.0-12.0)
Neutrophils 63.7 % (44.0-72.0)
Eosinophils 2.4 % (0.0-7.0)
Basophils 0.4 % (0.0-1.0)

Glucose 5.34 mmol/L (4.2-6.0)

Cholesterol 6.3H mmol/L (< 5.0)
HDL-Cholesterol 1.3 mmol/L (> 1.0)
LDL-cholesterol 4.0H mmol/L (< 3.0)
Triglycerides 2.4H mmol/L (< 1.7)

I'm 24, I don't really exercise much—just occasional physical exertion—and I'm a regular blood donor. My paternal grandfather had high RBC counts, and so does my paternal aunt.
Is this cause for concern?
Also, my bilirubin is usually elevated; could that be due to the high RBC and hemoglobin levels?

Thx

The most glaring issue here is hyperlipidemia. Your cholesterol, LDL, and triglycerides are all too high. You need to change your lifestyle and stick to a diet recommended for hyperlipidemia (you can find guidelines online or just ask your doctor).
Regarding the high bilirubin, you haven't provided nearly enough information to make an assessment. It could potentially be Gilbert's syndrome, which is a benign condition that carries no significant health risks and often sees bilirubin spikes during times of stress.
While your RBC count is slightly elevated, your hematocrit (Hct) remains within the normal range, so there's no reason to worry about that specifically.

Keith Lewis3 said:Could someone please provide an answer to the question mentioned above?🙏

That is what we call a normal complete blood count.😉

🤣🤣🤣
If this is how you intend to approach your studies through the end of the school year, then you are in for a truly miserable time...
Unless you actually get off your rear and attempt to grasp how anatomy and physiology work—rather than just memorizing lines from some random internet posts—you're wasting your breath...

rapidrider3 said:Here, I grabbed a photo from my phone of when my little one had this mess... first he broke out in spots, then they turned into blisters, then scabs, then just patches of dry skin—it was rough and lasted forever...

This was right when those blisters popped up, the absolute worst phase... it looked disgusting... it's also on his shoulder, though that's just dry, rough skin, along with a few other small spots...

I'm posting the link because the image isn't pretty, so consider this a warning if you have a weak stomach...

http://i29.tinypic.com/k3r58j.jpg

Lindy, this has nothing to do with an allergy. Based on what I'm seeing, it’s either a bacterial infection—which seems less likely—or more likely herpes, maybe even shingles, depending on whether he's already had chickenpox. What the OP is dealing with is something else entirely.
I hope your child is doing better!

This looks like hives—allergies are often the underlying culprit here. You should definitely see a dermatologist to figure out what's actually going on. My sister-in-law dealt with an urticarial rash a few months after she gave birth; she still has no idea what triggered it because she never had the chance to get allergy testing done. It’s been two and a half years since her delivery, and while she still gets flare-ups occasionally, they aren't nearly as frequent as they used to be.

maryy84 said:CIN stands for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 😉 since you seem so desperate to argue with me☕. And no, CIN isn't caused by inflammation 😂—but hey, if you want to keep believing that, go right ahead 🤷. About 90% of CIN cases are caused by HPV (feel free to look at some actual medical literature if you don't take my word for it 🤷).

I work in healthcare, so while I appreciate the question, I think I can manage without any "extra education" on this subject.😂

I second this.
High-risk HPV is the cause of cervical cancer. That isn't just an opinion; it’s a stance backed by medical research, which makes it the only scientifically sound position acceptable in any serious discussion. While new, evidence-based facts are always welcome, if anyone is going to spread misinformation claiming that HPV doesn't cause cervical cancer, they need to prove it scientifically. They can provide articles, provided they come from legitimate sources (Wikipedia and similar sites are absolutely not relevant here).
As for the forum user claiming that conization isn't currently an acceptable, adequate, or the ONLY medically justified procedure for early-stage cervical carcinoma: she wasn't forced to undergo the procedure. Assuming she is an adult, she could have refused whatever was offered. However, I utterly reject her message to others to refuse that treatment, which directly endangers their lives and health. Nobody wants surgery, but burying your head in the sand and acting on misinformation only serves to increase mortality rates from cervical cancer.
If this same user has any medically relevant evidence that refutes what I've stated above, let her present it. I would gladly accept new findings.
But charlatanism and pseudo-science are extremely dangerous to those who aren't well-informed, and they only serve to confuse and frighten those who are most vulnerable.

bluehawk73 said:Yes, I would vaccinate my daughters.

The reasoning is simple: if I have the power to lower their risk of cervical cancer, I am going to do it.

Every vaccine or medication carries its own set of side effects. One must remain informed and weigh the options carefully. The claim that x children died from vaccine consequences tells me nothing without context. Out of how many vaccinated individuals? How many of those cases were actually clinically linked to the vaccine? (For instance, if someone dies of pneumonia while taking an antibiotic, that death is reported—but it doesn't mean the antibiotic caused the death.)

Vaccinating a child does not mean they should abandon protection during sexual intercourse, nor does it imply they will be reckless. It simply means the risk of cervical cancer from certain types of HPV is reduced.

My sisters were vaccinated against hepatitis b back before it was part of the standard schedule. This is because I believe the benefits outweigh the risks associated with the shot.
However, I wouldn't vaccinate my child against chickenpox, for example. Or against hepatitis A. I am just clarifying that I am not blindly "pro-vaccine" for everything. As a parent, I weigh the pros and cons.

But when it comes to the HPV vaccine, I have no doubts.

As for curing HPV with homeopathic remedies, I will only take that seriously once I see comparative studies between a homeopathy group and a placebo group showing a statistically significant difference. As it stands, some people recover... well, some people recover spontaneously.

I completely agree!👍
That article mentioned above is full of nonsense and inaccuracies regarding HPV being a cause of cancer and the actual incidence rates. Things are being taken out of context and presented in a way meant to confuse and incite panic. I haven't studied Gardasil in exhaustive detail, but it is certainly a credit to science that an HPV vaccine finally exists, and I can only hope they develop ones for the other subtypes soon.
Regarding alternative treatments, I am entirely open to them, but strictly as a supplement to conventional medicine when dealing with serious diseases like cancer. I would never recommend relying solely on an alternative approach.

mistydrifter20 said:Does anyone know where I can actually find that Ticino cake batter? Like, if someone knows a spot in Indianapolis that carries it, let me know. I’ve been scrolling through recipes online and honestly—there are way too many different versions out there. It feels like such a massive gamble to try making it from scratch myself right now. Plus, I'm kind of in a huge rush here. Thanks, guys!😁

Check this out: www.sveisvasta.com
I've ordered a few bits and pieces through the mail before, and I noticed they stock fondant there.

feraltrucker22 said:. . So, what are you all planning to put on top of the cake? I’m drawing a blank. I can't stand those little bride and groom figurines they usually use at the venue where I'll be working, and I'm definitely not a fan of pigeons either...🤷

I don't care much for those little bride and groom figurines myself. The wedding theme is daisies, so that’s exactly what will be sitting on top of the cake.😍

Of course transmission is possible regardless of whether sperm is swallowed. You can contract just about anything. Herpes is easy enough to pick up, while HIV is slightly more difficult than through standard methods.

Alexander Lewis said:Tubal ligation isn't contraception; it's sterilization. You clearly don't grasp the distinction: contraception provides temporary protection, whereas sterilization is permanent. Once you're sterilized, you can't get pregnant ever again—assuming the procedure was performed correctly.

As usual, we have misinformation being spread here.👎
Tubal ligation is indeed classified as a method of contraception, and it doesn't offer a 100% guarantee against pregnancy. Even when the surgery is handled perfectly according to medical standards, there remains a tiny, albeit existing, failure rate of about 0.4% due to potential fallopian tube recanalization. A woman undergoing this procedure must be warned of that possibility. This is an elective request typically considered for individuals over the age of 35.

graniteraven6 said:I’m a little confused, honestly. I’m definitely one of those people who avoids taking tests—I’d much rather just not think about it and then be pleasantly surprised when I realize I'm actually two weeks late...

But I finally took one this morning because my throat is super sore and it's really bothering me. I wanted to take some Klavocin or maybe another antibiotic I have lying around from last time, but I didn't want to risk hurting the baby at all if there actually is one... the test was negative 🙂 though I guess maybe I just took it too early.😛My last period started on May 20th, 2007, and since I've had two cycles following my D&C, things haven't really stabilized yet; my first period was 35 days after, and the second was closer to 45 days... I don't really know much about testing, and I definitely don't have the energy to read through 62 pages of info on the subject, so I figured I'd just ask you guys who actually know what you're doing...🙂

Why do you think you need an antibiotic? Are you experiencing any other symptoms? What is your temperature? There is no reason to take them; in fact, you shouldn't be indiscriminately pumping yourself full of antibiotics. Most sore throats are viral, which means antibiotics won't do anything. You're just poisoning yourself for nothing. The worst thing you can do is take antibiotics on your own without thinking, especially if you suspect you might be pregnant. Take a test, go see a doctor to have your throat examined (unfortunately, there are plenty of doctors who find it easier to prescribe an antibiotic even when it isn't necessary), and only take an antibiotic if it is truly required. And Quincy is definitely and absolutely NOT the first choice for a sore throat.

If that’s the case, then I managed to land a pretty incredible deal. I picked up some Essilor 1.6 lenses with a -3.25 diopter strength $200 paired with frames that look perfectly fine $167 and even snagged a cash discount. All told, it was $300. Their approach was efficient and highly professional; they had my glasses ready in just ninety minutes. I actually swung by to pick them up before 7 PM and left satisfied. They still have my profile on file in their system.
Šahini Optical on Deadman's Channel in Seattle.

Scott Allen10 said:I completely disagree. Just because a service is private doesn't mean it's superior. If anything, I think we need to be extremely cautious here—both for the sake of our bank accounts and our own physical health.

I couldn't agree more. In private practice, people tend to be incredibly polite and patient, but that isn't some kind of guarantee regarding their actual expertise. Even so, in those settings, you truly feel like a human being rather than just a number.

Bradley Thompson9 said:Do you know which medication works best for it? I tried using Neurem, but it didn't do a thing...

Just take some Nolicin—two tablets for a week should likely clear up that E. coli issue once and for all.
I'll be 👍 rooting for you!

Are you dealing with frequent or painful urination? What is your gender and age? Based on what you’ve described, it sounds most likely like a bladder infection, and frankly, antibiotics or urinary antiseptics are the only real way to handle that. One of the top options is Nolicin. I am, however, quite surprised your doctor didn't prescribe a course of treatment immediately, and more importantly, why did you go in for a urinalysis in the first place?

Look, I can't speak for how things work in Washington, D.C., but back when I was in Seattle, I used the student health clinic and had a great experience. They were incredibly attentive and precise, plus they always seemed to have an extra doctor on standby just in case. That said, quite a bit of time has passed since you originally posted this, so I sincerely hope you managed to get that awful issue sorted out.
Best,

Douglas King7 said:I’m planning on switching doctors here in Seattle starting next year.

I am open to your recommendations—who, where, and why they would be the best fit.

P.S. What are the specific dates for this transition, specifically regarding the transfer of medical records?

I'm curious—what's the reason for the change?

Chris Morgan67 said:SINERSUL IS EVIL

I have no idea who else is being prescribed this antibiotic. The last time I took it, I ended up with a hellish bladder infection and spent a week crying in the hospital because I couldn't even make it to the restroom without agony!
And it isn't like I'm allergic to penicillin... the only things that trigger yeast infections for me are Klavax or Augmentin.

But my doctor just put me on some Klavax penicillin antibiotics recently and I didn't get any candidiasis at all.
Stop posting about this and just go see your doctor!!!!

Just a small side note—Augmentin and Klavax are actually the exact same medication, just amoxicillin and clavulanic acid produced by different manufacturers. 🙂