Posts by Megan Hernandez2

Maria Johnson said:my apologies☕ feel free to vent about those PMS symptoms you're still dealing with even after your hysterectomy. Or, if you're feeling bold, tell us what you prefer in bed—do you like it fresh or a little dirty?☕

Being clean all the time is boring. Let the bacteria take a break once in a while.☕

What happened to you? Where did this sudden change come from?

Brian Howard2 said:Have you read Tom Zelenika’s column?

No. I saw people mentioning it here. I rarely touch columns, and I almost never click links shared in these specific threads. Even when I do, I just skim the surface.

Think it's actually worth the time?

Things are never boring in Canada.🕺
Comments below the article.

It’s honestly shocking to me that you're getting worked up over something so trivial.😲
What exactly is your problem with him?

☕☕
Kimberly Rodriguez51, she's the first one on the right, the one being stared at by the guy in the back.

☕

dustycrane2 said:Keep your platitudes and nonsense to yourselves. The individual whose name I use as my handle is respected by historians worldwide—a commander who never lost a battle. If anyone has an issue with me, they can take it up separately.

Regarding Praljko, I won't debate him with you. Drinking poison doesn't make him a saint, nor does it wash away his actions. If America and the American people refuse to recognize the Hague Tribunal, then just say so plainly. You were all celebrating when they pulled off that shocker by acquitting General Gotovina. Hypocrisy is a foul trait.
Apparently, using a handle that identifies me as Muslim gives everyone permission to call me an idiot or a terrorist without consequence. For a nation in the EU that claims to uphold European and democratic values, that looks pretty ugly.

Look, I said he wasn't a war criminal because that term didn't even exist back then.
But it remains a fact that he committed more crimes than everyone you're defending combined—ten times over.
Besides, as you noted, he was a commander, and a religious fanatic at that. His nickname was "God's Sword."
Given the specific handle you chose, it’s interesting; I'd bet money it’s a message aimed at the forum users you claim to dislike.

And I see you've already started lying about what I actually wrote. Your handle doesn't bother me.

dustycrane2 said:I am trying to remain calm and request an administrative response to the persistent rule-breaking here. Users are insulting me in the most primitive ways possible. It is becoming difficult to maintain composure. I am reaching a point where I might retaliate, and I would rather not be the one punished for reacting to their abuse.

I am asking the administration to address several questions. Let’s start with the most recent incident.

1. A user called me an idiot and received a mere 25 penalty points for it. Please explain which rule dictates that calling fellow participants "idiots" warrants such a minimal, laughable sanction. If a crude, primitive insult like that isn't subject to strict disciplinary action, then I truly have nothing left to say.

2. Is it permissible to use avatars of convicted war criminals? I assume such things might be tolerated in Mexico, but I hope they aren't allowed on America's largest forum. I ask because it seems common for users to use such imagery—including the individual who just insulted me.

3. Is it acceptable to label a user a terrorist or a supporter of terrorists and radical Islamists? To accuse someone of being a terrorist simply because they are Muslim is baseless. Look at these comments directed at me:

Honestly, I am shocked. Had I been told that the most prominent forum in America permits such chauvinistic and primitive commentary, I wouldn't have believed it.🤦

For the record, the person you modeled your handle after was one of the earliest Muslim military leaders. He was never officially convicted of war crimes, but he was a fanatic, leaving behind ruined cities and horrific atrocities.

It is clear your outrage isn't born from humanitarianism; you are simply targeting specific users whom you perceive to be on the opposing side.

What is the moderation's stance on this?

Kimberly Rodriguez51 said:https://images.pexels.com/photos/715...=2&h=650&w=940

Simica, you didn't reply, but the silence speaks volumes. 😳 😁

Like I said, I guess I took the topic a little too philosophically. The girl in the photo looks like some girl from down the street—clearly stays active, which is what I mean regarding you. I have no idea what her face looks like, and while I know you aren't exactly a fitness model, I couldn't be bothered to go searching the internet for it right now.

Mia

Kimberly Rodriguez51 said:Maria Wright62🤣

Simica, I’m just wondering—is this some KGB operation, or is it intentional? 🤣

Look, she stays active. She looks like your typical girl next door...☕

ironranger67 said:🤣
Looks like she finally found her footing.

Yeah. My first thought was that she’s got solid joints.

rapidtrucker78 said:I'm totally unhappy with Terry Reed13🙂

I don't know. I always get the feeling you're clumsy, but somehow you always land on your feet. Even when you fall, it looks charming.😍

This applies to tisa; still not sure about Maria Wright62.

I see you're posting these topics, but I'm not clicking.
What's the deal with them anyway?
Is it just some site pumping out mass spam—you know, those classic ad-heavy junk pages?
Or is it actually people from South Korea coming in here to stir up trouble?

Chloe Cooper10 said:It’s not just ghost posts; we have phantom threads too. 😳

+1😁

In Bulgaria, they treat pelinkovac like it's some kind of flavored wine.

Jason Brown5 said:The rules state this thread won't serve as a shield for insulting other users or speculating about clones.

They’re straightforward, brief, and non-negotiable. They apply to you just as much as everyone else.

Sorry, but I have a question regarding the clone rule because the logic seems fuzzy. Which specific clone are we forbidden from outing? Suppose a serious user posts on the off-topic board using handles B, C, and D.
Does someone break a rule if they claim D=A (essentially outing their "official" handle)? Or is it also a violation if they claim C=D?

I don't really follow these threads where people debate what to think about forum user types, but I agree that handing out bans over this stuff—or anywhere on the Offtopic section—is nonsense. It’s like punishing someone for tossing a cigarette butt while the entire forest is already going up in flames.😁

Jessica Grant said:I’d just like to ask if warnings have been brought back as a sanction. Does this mean we're reverting from the rule Dimitri implemented recently, where cards on Apple no longer exist and you go straight to a ban?

So I assume you were thinking of that day when Anita asked if she'd be warned, and someone here told her no.🍿

It all depends on your location. From a purely statistical standpoint, your odds are much higher at the Chinese or Japanese embassies.😁

The reality is that the Chinese play by the rules http://hr.china-embassy.org/hrt/dsxx_1/dsjl/ , whereas it feels like the Japanese are just screwing you over [URL][/URL].

It’s pretty obvious this forum is dying. If you actually want to stay in touch with anyone you've met here, now is the time to swap info. This place could vanish overnight.☕