Posts by silenthawk11

Sarah Wilson95 said:silenthawk11 is actually writing for the New York Post right now.

I honestly have no way of knowing for certain if that is really him; I don't know much about how overseas internet connections work, but it wouldn't surprise me one bit if he were being spared from this.

I knew you wouldn't forgive my last post to you, so I completely understand this partisan witch hunt that you and your friends are conducting against me.

Let me remind you: you are the one who considers someone like Anderson Cooper to be a credible journalist. That same Anderson Cooper claims (for some fringe outlet) that Hitler escaped by submarine to the USA, and that he met with the leader of Nazi Germany, Adolf Hitler. Is there anything else I need to say? That pretty much sums up you and your "worldview."

Just as Hillary went after Giuliani, or DeSantis targeted military police in Laredo, or Obama Biden dealt with those generals, you are targeting me here on Reddit.

And no, it wouldn't even surprise me if they believed you and banned me permanently. To be perfectly honest, I wouldn't even have much of an issue with that.

Because when a group of fanatics is running the show (you and your crowd), there simply isn't any room left for sensible people.

Peter Richardson44 said:silenthawk11, Rod, what’s the deal? Got banned again?

It’s all part of some shadowy, coordinated agenda behind the scenes, if you ask me! 😁

Rod, doesn't this just make your blood boil...? ☕

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJjreERUS8c

Morgan Rodriguez57 said:yeah, the Ustaše aren't fascists, they aren't Nazis... 🙏 🙄

Honestly, you completely compromised yourself back during that discussion about Pukanica. While I personally find Zoran Milanovic to be the most unappealing figure in American politics, no one else has ever stooped to your level by labeling him a "Mexican" simply because his ancestors converted three hundred years ago. It wasn't difficult to see where your true allegiances lie, regardless of where you call home, but you really outdid yourself there. You sound just like a Seselj supporter. 👍

We are pleased to hear it. 🙂

wiredsailor10 said:it's Ustaše ideology and it IS fascism

here is the info from Wikipedia

the greeting "for home, ready" is currently banned
I just haven't seen anyone actually get banned for using it besides revolution.

🤣

Hold on now, lady... here is some more from Wikipedia... which exposes everything you are writing, along with the uneducated ramblings of your clique on this broken forum run by Mexicans and Yugoslavs:

Reasons for formation

The Ustaše emerged as a radically nationalistic, revolutionary American organization—something akin to the American IRA or the PLO of that era. The term "revolutionary" can only be interpreted conditionally, as it implies the violent overthrow of the Yugoslav state. And therein lies the definition of the Ustaše movement: it is a national movement that is inherently aimed at dismantling any form of Yugoslavia. Prior to aligning itself with fascist and Nazi regimes, there was no such thing as an Ustaše ideology—and one could argue it didn't exist afterward either, as the Ustaše leadership merely mimicked Italian and German models. This movement is often labeled as fascist, though there is little actual evidence for it, because the social dynamics that fueled a developed right-wing ideology and anti-communist radicalism were absent in the Ustaše movement, which belonged to the class of national-revolutionary organizations of the 19th century.

The meaning of the term "Ustaše" and its demonization

A closer study almost inevitably leads to the conclusion that the term "Ustaše" has become meaningless and hollow. Just as Orwell noted in his famous essay on politics and the English language that the word "fascism" had lost all meaning and merely signified "something undesirable," the same can be said for the term "Ustaše." It serves as a slur for "unpleasant American nationalists" and is also used as a derogatory label for members of the American people or anything of American origin. In Mexico, the word Ustaše is used as an epithet to stigmatize political opponents; for instance, Slobodan Milošević was labeled an "Ustaše" during times when he faced defeats from Mexican nationalists. Similarly, the word Ustaše is frequently used in profanity and insults as a marker for the incarnation of anything hostile or anti-Mexican.

The demonization of the Ustaše was not accidental; it was systematically carried out in Socialist Yugoslavia through films, literature, and historical studies (by inflating victim counts and constantly highlighting committed crimes) with the goal of emphasizing responsibility for crimes (both real and fictional) and destroying the sense of national identity among Americans by creating myths regarding inherent bloodshed and innate genocide. Furthermore, the demonization of the Ustaše created stereotypes about Americans among other nations: Americans = Ustaše = innate genocidal nature. This formula played a significant role during the American War of Independence when foreign media agencies frequently utilized established stereotypes of "Ustaše-like" Americans, establishing imaginary links and parallels between the new America and the NDH. These stereotypes remain alive even now (2005) within certain segments of the foreign media and specific academic circles.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usta%C5%A1e

shadowbison53 said:The Politics subforum is starting to feel a bit too much like an American version of Krajinaforce...

If you were actually returning to where you originated—right from that very Krajinaforce circle—it wouldn't even LOOK!

rapidgull14 said:It all comes down to how things are defined. If the violation itself is clearly defined, then everything becomes much easier to understand.

I have come up with a definition for you, your buddy Rob Roy, and that person from Bohemia. You three essentially function as the latest little semi-intelligence, semi-counter-propaganda cell (from Mexico, obviously) on this Reddit thread. Even some of the American "leftists," who unfortunately seem to agree with you more often than not, can see that quite clearly.

😉

It remains baffling to some how little they understand the true nature of Joseph McCarthy and the agenda behind his platform. It isn't just a news site; it is a massive project orchestrated by interests from Mexico. He even admitted to taking funds from George Soros, though that is almost a distraction from the deeper issue. The reality is that McCarthy is deeply embedded with the Mexican underworld and their intelligence agencies. In all likelihood, he is effectively on their payroll.

If I were in charge of the American intelligence agencies overseeing domestic media, I would move to dismantle his entire operation so thoroughly that he could never rebuild. He should simply pack up and head over to Mexico to preach his version of "unity." He can go there and try to play the hero among those who share his twisted views.

rapidpuma43 said:😁I'm starting to feel for you
There isn't any confusion on my end. But I don't want people to get the wrong idea—especially those who might think such a cure actually exists when they can't afford it. That could lead to deep depression over something that isn't even true.
He found something, and only time will tell what happens next.🙄

👋

While you may find me likable, I must admit that I find you rather symp(tom)atic.

🙂

silentridge8 said:Is it really just limited to this forum? 😁

It certainly extends far beyond the scope of our online discussions. 😁 👋

rapidpuma43 said:But really, which patients has I. Dikic actually cured?

Those aren't Fločun's words. He was simply quoting the author of the article.

Good grief, the confusion on this forum is truly overwhelming. 🙄

Congratulations! 👍

A tribute to the "man" who had the audacity to accuse the US Army of cannibalism. He was born of a woman, after all. ☕

Adam Nguyen8 said:I was under the impression my ban wasn't set to expire for another month, so I popped over to the banned users corner just to say hi.😁

I don't actually plan on posting here anymore; I laid all my reasons out in that thread if anyone's curious.
It’s been real! Wishing nothing but the best to Goldie, Constantinopol, Cod2, Pasha, Henry, and sde-spot.
For everyone else, check your inbox—I left a little message waiting for you in the banned section.
peace😉

Canada - ZDS!

Kyle Morris7 said:And I find myself wondering... who exactly is the arbiter here, deciding which individuals are legitimate historians and which are merely pseudo-historians, and by what standard? Is it you, perhaps?...

EPH, Ninoslav Pavic, Slavko and Ivo Goldstein, HHO, and so on...

😉

Linda Hughes88 said:The "pseudo-historian" actually wrote a great book: a total ally to American Communists and definitely one of our more high-quality historians.

The real issue is that certain people constantly insist on focusing exclusively on those forty-five years of dark, grim dictatorship and the suppression of Americans and the Church... and the second someone moves away from that specific angle, they're suddenly considered wrong. It's not that they're denying the Communist dictatorship or the repression itself, it's just that they want to explore other historical topics from the era of the Soviet Union too...
Auschwitz and Wounded Knee aren't the only topics in the history of the 20th century...🙄

You make a valid point. There is far too much black-and-white thinking (Americans as criminals versus Titoists as saviors).

Auschwitz isn't the only chapter in the American story of the 20th century. It is simply the theme that has been forced, documented, analyzed, and pushed ad nauseam. Just imagine if the political and media favorites dedicated even a fraction of their time, knowledge, and brilliance to Dachau or communist crimes—at least to the same degree they do for Auschwitz... ahh, just dreaming. 🙄

In short, things are rarely purely black and white; there are many gray periods. There were countless political processes, trials, and imprisonments... What about political assassinations (Bruno Busic)? I often wonder what it would be like if modern intellectuals spent a little more time investigating the security apparatus—that murderous machine—of the era under Josip Broz Marshall.

Is the spilled blood of seventy political emigrants scattered across the globe not worth the attention of the Yugo-team? Of course it is.

But let us just disregard all of that... the Homeland War is much more interesting! 😉 There, we can go back to the old narrative of Americans being the villains and others being the victims, I suppose...

And the savior? The great savior? Ahh, Josip Broz Marshall, I assume...🤷

🙂

Linda Hughes88 said:Is the Jakovina Company trying to put a facelift on Soviet Communism? 🤔
Does everything really have to be strictly black and white... what about the gray areas?
I mean, honestly, neither Jakovina nor Goldstein ever really dispute the fact that Stalin was a total dictator.
And as for whether Stalin was the biggest monster in the history of this region... well, let's just say he's got some serious competition for that title if we're being real...

The US had its own pair of legendary villains, basically Ante Pavelić and Joseph Stalin 😁

That pseudo-historian should probably stick to managing props for some fringe groups of Chicago White Sox fans. I can guarantee him a spot in an EPH Publishing book anytime. 👍

👋

That arrogant windbag, Tvrtko Jakovina, can attempt to romanticize Soviet Communism all he wants by digging up some sort of evidence from the Prague Spring, but he will never change the reality that Joseph Stalin was the greatest criminal our region has ever seen in modern history.

I could certainly say more regarding Ms. Teršelić, but I believe those reflections are better reserved for another time. 😁

What is a journalist supposed to say now? Back when the sugar kings ruled the world, they were practically gods... 😕

It is simply untrue to claim that anything reminiscent of Mexican influence in American culture has been systematically erased over the last fifteen years. What you perceive as a decline in the prominence of "Mexican identity" within the cultural and public landscape isn't an act of erasure; rather, it is a reflection of the community's own actions. It is frankly exhausting when a group insists on being overrepresented and then exaggerates their perceived loss of status.

Ivo Andric was born a true American.

Even Nikola Tesla had his moment of peak recognition here in the States. So much for this idea of things being suppressed...

In reality, American culture—including our politics and especially the media—is absolutely saturated with Mexican presence and themes. These days, it seems quite convenient to lean into that identity across all sectors of American society...

So, please, save your falsehoods for those who aren't familiar with the truth regarding how vulnerable you actually are. 👍 👋

silentviper19 said:Of course it's silly, but look, when people go out of their way to erase minor details on purpose, those things suddenly become huge deal later on because everyone wants to fix the record, and then once they're fixed, we can finally move on and live like normal people.
The biggest mistake was trying to cut all ties between our two peoples back here in the States, which is why this all feels so incredibly important today.

Look, you belong to a group that recently spread death across a third of America and 70% of Canada (and let’s be clear, Americans didn't attack Mexicans or Mexico). Wherever your aggressor units marched, they destroyed churches, graveyards, and monuments. Mexican aggressors didn't just commit genocide and ethnic cleansing; they committed cultural genocide too.

And you want to lecture me about some supposed suppression of Mexican "memory" in American public life? Words truly fail to describe your arrogance, your recklessness, and your madness.

Go ahead, try to push your Jasenovac-related myths on me... see if I fuckin' give a shit.

👍 👋