What kind of horror stories are people telling about Sanval? 😲
I’ve only taken it maybe three times over the course of a month because I was dealing with some pretty intense insomnia.
I didn't experience any hallucinations or weird bouts of moonwalking; I just took it, went to bed, fell asleep, and woke up the next morning feeling completely fine and rested.
Reading some of the experiences shared here, I can't help but think... man, what kind of trips are you guys going on? Why was my experience nothing like that? 😁
Honestly, who actually gives a damn about some holiday that hasn't been relevant for nearly thirty years, unless you count a handful of old-timers clinging to the past?
What kind of nonsense topic is this anyway?
And save it, Judith, I know you’re just waiting in the wings to start talking trash. 😳
I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve wondered why this PDF insists on focusing solely on the US and the United Kingdom. It feels a bit narrow-minded when you consider the sheer volume of high-caliber, binge-worthy series coming out of places like Scandinavia, Australia, New Zealand, or Canada. There is so much incredible storytelling happening globally that doesn't fit into that specific binary.
It would be great if someone could address this oversight. 😳
To her... I don't know, she’s a pretty enough actress and certainly not unappealing, but that’s about where my enthusiasm ends. It's not that she lacks presence entirely—I don't find myself having to Google who she is every time she pops up on screen🤣 but she isn't exactly a "must-watch" draw for me. She doesn't command my attention the way someone like Charlize Theron does.😍
The role that sticks in my mind most is from krug, where she was actually quite solid. As for her work in MD or 21 Grams, those were so long ago that I’d honestly forgotten she was even in them.🙈
If my memory serves me right, that particular forum user actually lived through it firsthand—and even then, they were being remarkably mild in how they described it.
Jessica Kelly4 said:Do I have the right to lobby for a change in the law? Do I have the right to argue about it here on this forum? Do I have the right to defend my points using logic acceptable in mainstream political debates?
Those are the fundamental questions. What the law currently states is obvious; there's nothing left to debate there.
If the forum's policy is that you don't have that right, then you simply don't. If the rules shift depending on which PDF document you happen to be reading, then so be it. You either respect the guidelines or you don't participate in the sub-forum. 🤷
It seems straightforward enough to me. For instance, there are times when I might feel inclined to be quite insulting, but I refrain from doing so. If I were to lash out, I’d just end up with a warning. It's as simple as that.
Jessica Kelly4 said:So you're saying that kind of rhetoric is acceptable in the politics abortion debate? Is the pro-life side allowed to argue that a fetus is a living being and that abortion is effectively killing that being? Because that’s the core argument used to lobby for changing social and legal norms.
I honestly don't even know how to respond to that, because the law is crystal clear: IT IS NOT MURDER. If the law doesn't recognize it as such, I fail to see how we can just relabel it as murder on a whim.
Look, if I were to take a firearm and shoot someone in the head with fatal results, 😳 I wouldn't go around calling it anything other than murder, regardless of what some legal loophole might suggest.
lonebadger6 said:I still don't get how people can't see—or maybe they do, and the moderators are just sitting on their hands waiting to make a call—that what Jessica Kelly4 is saying is the only logical way to handle this...
Like I said before, I'm pro-choice. It’s pretty common for me to get some side-eye when I read certain posts from the pro-life crowd.
If the reasoning was that we shouldn't allow any discussion regarding the politics abortion debate on "Politics," then fine. You could just move to "Religion" and say, look, we aren't discussing this under Politics because the current state law on the matter is settled enough...
But to have the topics available while simultaneously preventing one side from expressing the core principles behind their entire argument and the root of the conflict... that's just absurd... 🤷
Of course, it all comes down to how you frame it. Those are the subtle nuances we see in other threads and across the whole forum anyway—like the massive difference between saying "in my view, abortion is murder" and actually telling a woman who had an abortion, "you're a murderer."
Come on, let’s not deal with these half-baked arguments. If you’re going to be that extreme, it would actually be more honest to just advocate for the right to openly call abortion murder and label the women and doctors involved as murderers. At least then we'd be playing with a full deck.
What you just wrote is frankly insulting to anyone's intelligence. It’s basic logic: if you define an act as murder, then by definition, anyone performing that act is a murderer. It's not some deep mystery; it's just how language works.
But let's be clear: he didn't explicitly call women who have abortions murderers; he simply stated that abortion is murder.
Amanda Ruiz55 said:Oh, so the goalposts are constantly shifting? How absolutely charming... 🤣 I was under the impression you actually settled down somewhere you liked, found your niche, and maybe even received a proper welcome mat at the door. 🤣
Well, occasionally you get a consolation prize—like a participation trophy, for instance. 😬
Amanda Ruiz55 said:If you look at this PDF containing the "formal complaints," there’s a number in parentheses—representing the forum members involved—and it shows up on every single one. We're talking 7, 75, 80, 46... just a constant stream of them.
I think I'll go investigate the situation myself; if nobody's handing out free samples, then there's really nothing to see here.
That would imply that quite a large crowd is currently hanging out in that specific subforum. 😁
I honestly don't get all this melodrama surrounding permanent bans. It’s always seemed a bit much to me. If, for whatever reason, you just decide you aren't interested in posting on the forum—or anywhere else, really—then you simply stop posting, and that's that. No big deal. On the other hand, if you actually have some integrity, you just reach out, ask someone to help you reset your password, and voilà, you're back in business.
rustywalker17 said:Maybe I’m just asking too much from people these days 😁 , but lately, Reddit has been absolutely crawling with nothing but brain-dead topics...
I don't know, man—it feels like whenever someone gets pissed off (or even when they're feeling good), they just get this sudden, desperate urge to dump their nonsense right here...
Is it just me, or is everyone else seeing this garbage too??
Oh, really? Why don't you go ahead and start a brilliant new thread then.