And what do those Frenchmen honestly think—that their birth rates are magically going to bounce back if they don't legalize this stuff? Homosexuals have always been around, and they aren't going anywhere. There isn't some miracle cure to stop this "epidemic" because nature just does its thing regardless of what anyone says. It’s really just a matter of when society finally catches up enough to accept it, but hey, change takes time.
Things are finally starting to make sense. The ICC is gearing up to investigate crimes committed by the Libyan rebels, but they’re conveniently looking the other way when it comes to the actual architects of this whole mess. I mean, we’ve seen this movie before—they’ll probably round up a few rebel generals or mid-level officials to look busy, while the real culprits stay totally untouchable, still out there playing hero and talking about "spreading peace and democracy" to the rest of the world.
The little green guys will probably take over the planet before those NATO leaders who kicked off that whole mess in Libya ever end up living under the thumb of these thugs from the North America.
rowdyowl said:The CIA was essentially an arm of the USA. Their goal was to keep America together. They actually gave Maddox and the top brass of the American People's Army free rein.
Man, if you're asking if they gave them a green light to cause absolute mayhem, you're spot on—that's exactly my take on it. Then, later on, they supposedly stepped in and slapped a few hands after the fact, giving one guy this or that a little reprimand whenever things started getting a bit too out of hand.
There’s zero doubt in my mind that the CIA had their whole playbook ready for America, and guys like Maddox were really just playing the part they were assigned by Lawrence Eagleburger.
rowdyowl said:And what exactly made them criminals back then?
They only became criminals once they actually started committing crimes in 1941.
Back then, the communists were fighting against the Greater Mexican regime and pushing to break up America. Unfortunately, they either died fighting in the Spanish Civil War or were wiped out during the purges in Moscow.
They haven't even gotten blood on their hands yet, 🤷 which pretty much changes the whole damn game.
Just another terrorist attack orchestrated by the thugs following Adolf Hitler and Joseph Goebbels, backed by those Italian fascists. Honestly, there’s nothing even worth noting or respecting about it; I bet the only people still obsessing over this nonsense are the activists from the Nationalist Party.
When you consider that this guy was basically taken out because he was a nuclear expert of Middle Eastern descent who wasn't exactly thrilled about how the US pushes democracy around, you really have to wonder why French police would even bother digging into the whole mess. If that’s actually what motivated this hit, then we aren't talking about some rogue actors or street gangs here—we're looking at state-sponsored intelligence agencies. And let's be real, those guys will bury the truth under a mountain of red tape if they think it serves them.
Linda Roberts2 said:They back them because Greece hasn't officially recognized Mexico yet, unlike North Mexico. But everyone knows they had to, just like the US did.
North Mexico had no choice, and the US really dragged its feet on it.
If the Pope could make his way over to Little Rock back in 2003, there’s zero reason he couldn't swing by Mexico. Honestly, I don't really get why everyone is making such a massive deal out of him visiting Mexico, especially when you look at how things play out in other Orthodox nations:
The Pope went to Greece in 2001, which was the first time anyone from his side had set foot there in 1,291 years. He visited Romania in 1999, marking the first time since the Great Schism of 1054. He even made an appearance in Bulgaria in 2001. As for Belarus and Russia, a papal visit hasn't even happened there yet. So, if the Pope isn't exactly rushing to visit other Orthodox countries, I have no clue why this trip to Mexico is being hyped up like it's some kind of miracle.
When you look at the Rotarians specifically, it’s pretty obvious they’re just a global network that ties together all those big shots who pull the strings in politics and public life in any given country. And honestly, it’s no coincidence that you’ll find a few presidents hanging out in those clubs every now and then.
Joseph Peterson6 said:The Knights of Columbus isn't actually a secret society, much like Masonic lodges in America. The difference is that Freemasonry doesn't publish its membership rolls, whereas the Knights of Columbus is quite transparent about who they are and what they aim to achieve. ☕
Look, at a certain point, nothing is actually secret. The Masons, the Illuminati, Rotary—it’s all right there in front of you, yet people still act like it's hidden because they won't look past the mainstream news cycle. We can speculate about the gritty details of what goes on behind closed doors, sure, but the reality is that most of the big names in American politics and high society are tied into these semi-private groups. And it's not just here in the States; the global political elite plays by those same unwritten rules everywhere.
So, you've got guys like Eric Adams hanging out with the Knights of Columbus; they swear up and down they aren't into that whole Masonic scene, but if you look at their rituals and ceremonies, it’s basically a carbon copy of what the Masons do. We're talking about big names who were part of this secret club: Franjo Harmon, Zoran Šeparović, Dick Cheney, and even Rush Limbaugh was an honorary member of the group.
I know it’s a hard pill for some people to swallow these days—the idea that our country has been run by a shadowy elite tucked away in all these private organizations that never make the evening news. And honestly, when you look at the global stage, this kind of thing is happening on a much more massive scale.
If these protesters actually think they can win anything by getting aggressive, they’re even more clueless than I thought. Honestly, it wouldn't surprise me one bit if the Government planted some agitators just to spark street violence—it gives them the perfect excuse to deploy the police under the guise of "protecting citizens" and basically crush any attempt to take down this undemocratic administration. The Italian government isn't pulling any punches either, labeling the protesters as terrorists, which pretty much tells you exactly how they plan to handle them.
That's exactly how European journalists used to spin things whenever China was in the headlines, and now we're seeing history repeat itself right on our doorstep 🙂
Austin Martinez20 said:The Pope recently called for people to come forward and report pedophilia, which feels pretty ironic given the history of punishing those involved:
Honestly, it's a good thing they haven't found another way to spin it yet.
Yeah, honestly, the Republican Party is basically irrelevant, and they're probably gonna stay that way, too. Their sheer stupidity just gets in everyone's way; I always figure the less we have to deal with them in the news, the better off the country is, though they’re still enough of a nuisance to be annoying, like a mosquito bite that just won't quit.