Raymond Wood77 said:I suppose Apollo 13 shouldn't really be grouped in with the others, considering we're dealing with actual historical events here, whereas everything else should probably just be labeled as sci-fi.
If we're going by that kind of logic, I guess every single movie that isn't based on a true story is just sci-fi then?
In my opinion, I don't really think this movie fits squarely into the sci-fi genre; it feels more like a disaster flick, much like "Gravity", or perhaps "Apollo 13"...
I just finished watching the film. It feels quite similar to the story told by another screenwriter, Trumbo (2015), though I suppose one could argue that "Trumbo" is actually a much better film. This particular one feels more like those black-and-white dramas you might find playing on PBS at odd hours.
Of course they need it. I suppose if they don't have any work at all during this COVID-19 era and end up losing their footing entirely, they probably won't fare much better down the road either.
Well, I suppose Heston did star in the sequel Beneath the Planet of the Apes (1970) , though one might argue the film is considerably inferior to the original, which leads me to believe that a lead actor isn't necessarily the deciding factor for quality, but rather the crew working behind the scenes.
🙂 I suppose the older generation probably learned how to suppress their memories and thoughts regarding this whole "problem." That is why I would say it is merely decent, rather than actually good. 6/10.
It’s decent enough, I suppose, though it somehow maintains this low-budget aesthetic despite having a $125 million price tag, and it isn't exactly breaking any records at the box office, barely scraping together about $20 million.
I suppose I might be running into an issue where the software crashes whenever I attempt to use the Motion Tracking feature. Everything else I have tested seems to function adequately, but at this particular step, the application simply shuts down entirely.
"If a service provider fails to meet their contractual obligations—essentially, if they aren't delivering the service exactly as outlined in their terms and conditions—you technically have the right to terminate your subscription agreement without being hit by any cancellation fees, though you'll still be responsible for any outstanding balances for services already rendered. However, I suppose if the provider hasn't sent you an official written notice stating they are unable to fulfill their end of the deal, it might be wise to refrain from unilaterally terminating the contract. Instead, it might be more prudent to file a formal written complaint or a dispute resolution request."
Source: FCC - The provider isn't meeting their contractual obligations. What are my options?
I suspect that price is strictly for the pre-order, which allows access to the film two days ahead of schedule. I suppose it might eventually drop to something like $6 later on.
When you originally put together that first post, those notifications didn't even exist; they were only implemented as a response to similar inquiries appearing on the forum. Now that everything has been integrated, I suppose the thread title has been updated as well.
I suppose in some sort of near future, Todd Hewitt happens upon Viola Davis, this mysterious girl who crashes onto his planet—a place where women have completely vanished and men are plagued by "The Noise," which I guess is this force that makes all their thoughts audible. In this rather dangerous landscape, Viola Davis's life is certainly at risk, and while Todd vows to protect her, he'll probably have to discover his own inner strength and uncover the dark secrets hidden within the planet itself.
Directed by: Doug Liman Starring: Tom Holland, Daisy Ridley, Mads Mikkelsen...
Scott Kern47 said:I suppose one could argue that Oz Return to Oz (1985) contains certain horror elements. It doesn't exactly strike me as a children's movie, not by any stretch of the imagination.
I suppose I should probably mention that looking back at this particular film, I find myself feeling somewhat conflicted about its legacy. It’s an interesting piece of cinema, I guess, though perhaps not in the ways people initially intended. One might argue that certain creative choices were quite ambitious for their time, even if they feel a bit dated now. I don't mean to be overly critical, but there is a certain sense that the execution didn't quite match the sheer scale of the vision. Maybe that's just my perspective, but I can't help but feel that a more nuanced approach might have yielded a much stronger result. It’s a complicated thing, really, trying to weigh artistic intent against the actual viewing experience.
Well, I suppose if we are being technically accurate, the animated version from 2013 does exist. Oz Return to Oz (2013)
