CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › cosmiclynx57 › Posts

Posts by cosmiclynx57

629 posts shown.

After Earth (2013) in Movies ·
Hey, at least we finally got one positive take on the movie under our belts!

So, what would you even compare this flick to? Like, if we’re talking actual quality, is it sitting on the same level as something like Moon? 🤷
After Earth (2013) in Movies ·
Daniel Kelly57 said:I was honestly counting down the minutes until this slog finally ended. I can’t even remember the last time I sat through something this boring in a theater. What a complete disaster. Just gross. I actually feel a bit sick knowing I wasted my time on this.🙂🙂

Man, what a total letdown, right? I was actually looking forward to this movie so much, too. What a waste of time!
After Earth (2013) in Movies ·
Here are my thoughts from someone who actually sat through the whole thing:

Quote : weak film. It’s basically a family business venture—you've got Smith and his son playing father and son, with Jada Pinkett stepping in as producer. And then there's the director, who for years now has been taking these potentially interesting projects and just completely tanking them. Well, wouldn't you know it, this time was no different...

Honestly, this movie could have easily been aired on, I don't know, Discovery, broken down into a bunch of little 15-minute segments. If it were any longer—I mean, if it actually hit a full 100 minutes—it would have been pure torture. Because even though it starts off somewhat promisingly, watching young Smith wandering around the planet looking for some SOS-apparatus that ended up just 100 kilometers away from his wrecked boat and his dad is just... boring. Like, seriously, it was boring enough to make a seven or eight-year-old kid sitting behind me start fidgeting in his seat. And what do you think older kids would be doing?

So, yeah, they really missed the mark on the target audience here. It’s not for adults, it’s not for older kids, and it’s definitely not for the little ones. So who is it actually for? I guess it's for the dad, just so he can brag about having an actor for a son! Maybe we should all just be merciful with our ratings because of that? It feels like a naive attempt at being noble—trying to show "wholesome family values" and a fairy-tale version of growing up in a harsh world, which is just a way to justify why they spent all this money on this instead of investing it into something actually useful. Anyway, grab some popcorn, give it a pass, and just give it a 2/10.

Source

I mean, sure, you might find a few comments over on YouTube saying the movie is actually good and they don't get why everyone is hating on it and whatnot... but for me, that's not nearly enough reason to risk throwing my hard-earned cash away.

Casey Bennett79 said:I'm planning on checking this movie out in the next few days... I see nothing but negative reviews everywhere lately, and the rating on IMDb isn't looking great either, but we'll just have to see 😉

So, did you end up watching it?
After Earth (2013) in Movies ·
Komsija ended up buying me a ticket since I didn't have anyone to go with, so we hit up the premiere today—and man, let me tell you, the movie was absolutely killer!!! 🙏

I’m actually pretty blown away, and honestly, quite a bit more than I expected. Ugh, I am so hyped to just get home tonight so I can sit down and write up a massive, detailed review of my thoughts.

Edit: Okay, total sarcasm there... I haven't actually seen the movie yet 😈 😂 @velvetmaker3 and Timothy Davis59, please don't hate me, but I just had to pull that old classic prank on you guys once in a while 😉
After Earth (2013) in Movies ·
I think I’m gonna sit this one out because the risk just feels way too high, and honestly, I have zero desire to just throw my money down the drain.

Man, I still remember all that noise surrounding John Carter—everyone was complaining about the budget or saying it wouldn't make its money back, but I walked away feeling like it was actually pretty decent, and seeing it on the big screen made it totally worth the ticket price. But looking at the reviews for this one? They seem super low, and there's definitely more quality stuff out there than this, especially compared to total trash like Battle la.

Besides, there's already a massive backlog of movies to catch up on, and before you know it, we'll be hyped for Superman anyway.
Bullet to the Head (2013) in Movies ·
Man, what an absolute blast of an action flick. 🙂

Honestly, it’s such a breath of fresh air for the genre, isn't it? It’s exactly the kind of high-octane ride an action movie is supposed to be.

Momoa is just phenomenal playing the villain, and Stallone is as great as ever—plus, those fight scenes and explosions were totally top-tier.
After Earth (2013) in Movies ·
northernpilot2 said:I’ve always been pretty skeptical about those IMDb ratings, mostly just because I find myself disagreeing with them more often than not. There are tons of movies sitting down there with a score below 5 that I actually really enjoy, so for me, it’s never been much of a reliable yardstick.🙂
Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not saying some films don't genuinely deserve a higher rating, but at the end of the day, it's all just a matter of taste, right? 🙂
We'll just have to wait and see, though I guess I am kind of curious to see how this all plays out. 🙂

True, but I don't think that applies to big blockbusters, because if I recall correctly, I can't remember a single sci-fi spectacle getting such a low rating.

Usually, blockbuster ratings tend to be way too high rather than way too low. And besides, I've watched plenty of horror flicks rated under a 4 that were actually solid—some even better than the highly-rated stuff—but when it comes to blockbusters, I really can't remember one dropping below a 5.
Jack the Giant Killer (2012) in Movies ·
Terry Morris41 said:those arguments are pretty weak

Yours aren't exactly winning any awards either, honestly—they're even weaker.
After Earth (2013) in Movies ·
IMDb: 4.6/10 😲
Metascore: 31/100
Rotten Tomatoes: 12% 😱

Whoa, I just took a look at these ratings and man, I am actually kind of shaken. This was totally unexpected.

I was honestly expecting something in the six range on IMDb, but this is just brutal. And seeing a 12% on Rotten Tomatoes? That’s just straight-up painful.

The reviews over on IMDb are all over the place, too. Honestly, if this turns out to be a total disaster like Battle, why would I even bother wasting my money? I wouldn't even touch it if it's that bad.

Has anyone actually sat down and watched it yet? 🤷
Jack the Giant Killer (2012) in Movies ·
Terry Morris41 said:Stop talking nonsense, because it’s actually the exact opposite—this movie is a total masterpiece compared to that Snow White trash

Look, I'm just laying out my own impressions and sharing my personal take, okay? So just back off! Arrr!

Actually, I could say the same thing to you:

Quit the nonsense, seriously—it's the other way around, this flick is complete garbage compared to how much of a masterpiece Snow White is🤷 😛
Jack the Giant Killer (2012) in Movies ·
Man, this was way weaker than I ever anticipated. I was honestly just expecting a mediocre flick, but this thing actually managed to sink way below average. It’s total Snow White trash—just absolute garbage from start to finish.

I could barely sit through it, honestly; I had to practically force myself to reach the credits. The special effects were so weak, like, embarrassingly bad, if you know what I mean? And the plot? Just incredibly dull and lifeless, even for a movie in this genre.

If you want to see how it should have been done, look at Snow White and the Huntsman (2012)—now *that* was a masterpiece, and that's the level of quality I was actually hoping for.

My rating: 2/10
Jack the Giant Killer (2012) in Movies ·
I'm probably gonna dive into this either today or tomorrow. Honestly, I've got pretty high hopes that it'll actually keep me entertained, especially since the rating over on IMDb looks decent enough, right?

frozenviper13 said:So, guess what? The rip just dropped today! Can you believe it? Finally! 🍿

Man, I swear Sky actually keeps you in the loop whenever a movie finally hits HD! It’s like they’re constantly checking in to let you know exactly when things are looking sharp—honestly, isn't that just incredibly thoughtful of them? 👍
Is Evil Dead the best horror franchise? in Movies ·
Patrick Martin said:absolute must-read for any horror buff

man, I almost totally blanked on this,
but is it actually the greatest horror flick ever made?

I wouldn't say it's the absolute best, but it’s definitely up there in the hall of fame when you consider how much it changed things.

Double down on that, signed, sealed, and delivered! 👍

Just so we're clear though, I personally gave the first one an 8/10 and then the sequel a solid 9/10.
The Kid (1921)

image

So, after what feels like forever, I finally sat down and watched an old silent flick starring the absolute legend himself, Charlie Chaplin.

Man, what a ride! Seriously, such a fantastic movie and just top-tier comedy. The story really pulls you in, and even though the humor is obviously from a different era, it’s still incredibly hilarious—like, genuinely laugh-out-loud funny.
For me, the absolute highlights have to be those scenes where that big guy shows up—he's basically like Popeye, right? He just bends a flagpole with one hand and knocks a chunk out of a wall like it's nothing! 😂
And oh man, don't even get me started on the part where the little kid is smashing windows everywhere, and then Chaplin just happens to stroll by looking all innocent, offering his "professional" services to fix everything up. 🤣
Scary Movie 5 (2013) has some seriously bottom-of-the-barrel ratings, and honestly, almost everyone I've been chatting with lately says it's easily the worst one in the whole franchise.

A few buddies and I were actually thinking about grabbing tickets to go see it, but we ended up passing on the idea after hearing how bad it was.

Has anyone else here actually sat through it? What did you guys think?
Honestly, that one is my second favorite all-time, which is exactly why I cast my vote for it. 👍

Patrick Martin said:I think I've only ever seen the first one, and if I remember right, it was actually pretty awesome.

Well, man, you really should've held off on voting until you'd sat through the whole series, because who knows? You might've ended up loving a different one even more!🤷
Monsters University in Movies ·
The brand new TRAILER just dropped 👋
!!!

I mean, seriously, can we talk about how good this looks? This is going to be absolutely epic! 👏
wiredraven82 said:Look, the first one was genuinely solid—it actually worked. But this second installment? It’s got that classic "just okay" syndrome, which is unfortunately way too common in horror sequels, if not in the genre as a whole.

Man, if you’re asking me which one was the absolute bottom of the barrel, I honestly don't even know where to start because there are so many ways a movie can totally miss the mark! But if I really had to pick a winner for the worst of the bunch, I'd have to say it's definitely one of those later sequels that just felt like they were running on fumes, you know? Like, once you get past that initial shock and the genius of the original, everything starts feeling so repetitive and forced. Which one do you think hit the lowest note?

David Ramos said:The poll feels somewhat pointless 🙂
1. stands head and shoulders above the rest

So, that's where things stand for now, but the second part has already snagged a vote, hasn't it? It really just comes down to personal taste at this point, right? I'm sure there are plenty of other people out there who might actually prefer one over the other, they just haven't jumped in to cast their votes yet!
Child's Play / Chucky 1-5

image_Chucky Collection DVD

Wikipedia: Child's Play (film series)

So, back on Halloween in 2011, I finally sat down to watch the first installment of the "Child's Play" horror franchise, and man, let me tell you, it left me with this massive craving to binge the rest of them immediately.
After powering through all five horror flicks in the series over the next few days, I officially bumped this whole franchise up into my all-time favorites list.

The "Child's Play" series is, first and foremost, just a total blast to watch every once in a while, and honestly, if you consider yourself a horror fan, you really ought to have this one sitting in your collection.
I mean, isn't a killer kid's toy—specifically a doll—enough reason for any horror junkie to give this a shot? It's such an original concept, right?
What I really love about this run is that none of the sequels feel like weak or bad filler; they actually kept things incredibly imaginative and creative throughout.
Interestingly enough, the first three are straight-up horror, while the last two lean more into horror-comedy, which I think gives the whole series a unique flavor that sets it apart from everything else.
.

*** Warning! Spoiler Alert! ***

Child's Play (1988)

image

This is one of those horror movies that truly defined the '80s. The sheer originality of having Chucky—a living, breathing, killing doll—gives the movie such a huge edge.

Even now, twenty years later, the original "Child's Play" still holds up incredibly well and hasn't lost an ounce of its quality.
The plot might be simple and maybe even a little predictable, but it works perfectly, satisfying even those viewers who prefer their horror a bit more serious. I hate when people dismiss it as "not a real horror movie" just because the villain is a doll, but to me, that's just silly. One thing I really appreciate about the pacing is that it has a clear beginning, middle, and end; nothing feels dragged out, and the story moves at just the right speed.
And when it comes to Chucky himself, there’s no question he’s a one-of-a-kind character. He is hands down one of the best killers ever put on screen, easily standing shoulder-to-shoulder with legends like Freddy Krueger, Michael Myers, or Jason Voorhees.
As a kid, whenever I walked into a toy store, I’d definitely be feeling a certain level of dread and caution, you know? Chucky actually creeped me out quite a bit, but I still absolutely loved watching the movie.

I should also mention that since the movie wasn't trying to be some high-brow masterpiece, it succeeded in being a really tight, clever, and original little horror flick with total cult status.

My rating: 7/10

-

Child's Play 2 (1990)

image

Personally, I think "Child's Play 2" is just as good as the original, and I actually consider it one of the best horror sequels ever made.

The only reason I’d ever give the first one the edge is simply because it was the introduction and gave us that initial "shock factor" of meeting Chucky for the first time.
But honestly? I might actually like "Child's Play 2" even more than the original because the atmosphere feels much creepier, and Chucky's pure malice and cruelty are dialed up to eleven.
The storyline is fantastic and ties in so seamlessly with what happened in the first film. The opening scene where Chucky finds his way back home and replaces the doll was just so powerful. As for the acting, Christina Elisa was great, and the kid playing Alex did a wonderful job too—it just worked.
The ending is really solid, and in my opinion, it’s actually better than the original's conclusion because it feels more meaningful to me. It just makes more sense for the doll to be destroyed in the toy factory where he was originally manufactured, though I'm definitely not saying the original ending didn't make sense too.

Honestly, I have to say this sequel caught me totally off guard in the best way possible! I went into it thinking it was probably going to be a total letdown compared to the original, you know? Like, usually these follow-ups just feel like cheap cash grabs that can't live up to the first one, but man, was I wrong. It actually turned out to be just as awesome as the first movie! Can you believe it? I was fully prepared to be disappointed, but instead, I ended up having a blast.

Honestly? I’d give it a solid 7/10. Not perfect, but definitely worth the watch!

-

So, I’ve been sitting here thinking about Child's Play 3 (1991), and honestly, where do we even start with this one? It’s such a trip looking back at how the franchise tried to pivot after that second installment! Do you ever feel like some sequels just want to jump straight into military settings because they think it adds instant grit? Because that’s exactly what happened here with the whole cadet academy vibe. It’s definitely a different flavor than the first two, isn't it? I mean, don't get me wrong, I still have a soft spot for it, but it feels so much more frantic, almost like it's trying way too hard to be "edgy" for the nineties. Does anyone else miss that original, creeping dread from the first movie? This one leans so heavily into the action-horror blend, turning the whole thing into this high-stakes survival game in a military school. It’s wild how they shifted the setting from suburban terror to basically a training camp drama. And let's talk about the kills for a second—they are definitely more intense, right? It feels like the filmmakers were really pushing the envelope to see how far they could go with the gore. Is it a masterpiece? Probably not. But is it a fun, chaotic ride if you're in the mood for some classic Chucky mayhem? Absolutely. It’s got that specific kind of energy that only early 90s horror can pull off. What do you guys think? Did the military setting work for you, or did it feel like a total left turn?

image

So, looking at the third installment, I wouldn’t say it’s a total disaster compared to the first two—it keeps that same frantic energy and pacing, if you know what I mean—but honestly? It still feels just a tiny bit weaker than the predecessors.

I mean, is it even possible that some of the shifts we're seeing are just because Andy isn't some little kid anymore? Like, once he grows up, the whole vibe of the story changes, right? It’s just not that same dynamic we saw at the start. But then again, maybe the change in setting is actually a good thing? Because if everything stayed exactly the same, wouldn't people just start complaining that the series was getting stale and begging for something new? It's kind of a win-win situation if you think about it.
Man, out of all those crazy scenes, I have to say my absolute favorite has to be that one moment where they almost ended up dead because Chucky decided to swap out their blanks for actual live ammo? Like, can you even imagine the sheer chaos of that?
Honestly, the plot is super engaging and totally keeps you hooked, just like every other movie in this series!

Honestly, at the end of the day, that third installment is a total blast and definitely deserves a spot in any serious horror collection. I mean, if you're building out your library, why wouldn't you grab it? It's just one of those movies that holds its own, you know?

Honestly? I’d give it a solid 6/10. Not exactly a masterpiece, but not a total disaster either, you know what I mean?

-

So, I was just sitting here thinking about Child's Play 4: Bride of Chucky (1998), and man, where does the time go? Does anyone else feel like we haven't talked about this one nearly enough lately? It’s such a wild departure from the early stuff, isn't it? You go from those gritty, tension-filled slashers to this absolutely unhinged, colorful, campy ride that basically reinvented the whole franchise's vibe. Honestly, who would have thought that leaning into the absurdity would be the move that kept the series alive? It’s kind of brilliant when you think about it! I mean, can we talk about how much fun this movie actually is? Even if you aren't a die-hard horror fan, there's just something about the chaotic energy that grabs you. It’s got that perfect blend of dark humor and pure mayhem that makes you want to grab some popcorn and just enjoy the madness. Is it "scary" in the traditional sense? Not really, but is it entertaining? Absolutely! It’s like the filmmakers realized they could stop trying to make us jump out of our seats every five minutes and instead focus on making us laugh while Chucky causes absolute havoc. It definitely feels less like a standard slasher and more like a dark comedy adventure, which was such a bold choice at the time. I still find myself revisiting it whenever I need a good laugh or just want to see some stylized carnage. It’s a total blast!

image

There’s this unwritten rule in the horror world, right? Usually, once you hit that third installment, the franchise just starts its own downward spiral—it basically turns into a solo mission for the studio to just completely wreck the series' legacy. But honestly, looking at this one, that rule just doesn't seem to apply here at all.
So, they decided to shake things up a bit this time around by diving into some much sillier waters, right? They actually threw in a decent amount of humor with this fourth installment, which totally shifts the vibe into full-on horror-comedy territory—and honestly? It works so incredibly well!

Honestly, if you ask me, the fourth installment was designed perfectly! It’s such a massive win because it actually brings something totally fresh and different to the table by introducing yet another doll and leaning hard into that comedy vibe. Don't you just love it when a franchise isn't afraid to switch things up like that?
So, after that first sequel where they just played around with a different house and swapped out most of the cast besides the kid, we finally got a real shake-up with the third installment! This time around, they actually went big and ditched the little boy entirely, replacing him with this guy heading off to basic training or something. Honestly, I think it’s about time because it’s easily the biggest pivot the franchise has made so far, and personally? I think it's a total win.
That’s honestly what I love most about this franchise—they aren't just churning out sequels just to grab a quick paycheck, you know? Usually, with these kinds of series, once you get past the first movie, everything just turns into a total joke, but they actually seem to care here.
The plot is just pure, unadulterated chaos and honestly, how could it not be? I mean, you’ve got Chucky and his girl Tiffany running around together—it's hilarious! Like, seriously, think about it: this legendary killer doll actually has a girlfriend. It’s absolutely wild, man. This whole sequel feels like a twisted, doll-sized version of Bonnie and Clyde, just swapping out the humans for plastic nightmares. LOL!

Honestly, looking at the whole vibe, the quality is pretty much on par with the third installment, though obviously, it doesn't quite hit the heights of those first two movies, you know? But even if you aren't exactly a die-hard fan of this franchise, I don't think this horror-comedy is going to let you down one bit, so I’m definitely recommending it to everyone!

Honestly? I’d give it a solid 5/10. It was just... okay, I guess? Nothing to write home about, really.

-

So, I was just sitting here thinking about the absolute chaos that is the Chucky franchise, specifically when you get to the fifth installment, Seed of Chucky from 2004. Can we even talk about how much this movie completely flips the script on everything we thought we knew about the series? It’s such a wild ride! Honestly, if you went into it expecting a straight-up, gritty slasher like the early ones, you were probably in for a massive shock, right? Because let’s be real—this movie is basically one giant, hilarious, meta fever dream. It’s definitely got that specific Chucky-esque vibe where it stops trying to make you jump out of your seat with terror and starts trying to make you laugh at how ridiculous the whole situation has become. It’s campy, it’s colorful, and it’s honestly kind of brilliant in its own weird way. I mean, who else would dare to take a legendary horror icon and turn the plot into something so wonderfully absurd? It’s bold, I'll give it that! I know some people might call it a bit of a jerk move to veer so far away from the original tension, but personally, I think it adds so much flavor to the legacy. It’s like the franchise decided to stop taking itself seriously and just embrace the madness. Whether you love it or find it totally bizarre, you can't deny that Seed of Chucky is unlike anything else in the genre. It’s just pure, unadulterated fun if you’re in the right mood!

image

So, when you really think about it, isn't it just totally obvious that Seed of Chucky had to be the next step in the saga? I mean, after everything Chucky went through to finally land himself a bride, it only makes sense that he’d want to start a family and get a son, right? It feels like such a natural progression for his character!

In this latest installment, we get introduced to—well, I guess you could call them Pinocchio, haha, just kidding!—Glen/Glenda. They’ve got dual names because Chucky insists their kid is a boy while the mother claims it's a girl, which is just wild, right? Anyway, they’re basically working as some kind of sideshow attraction at a circus until they accidentally catch a glimpse of their parents on TV, and suddenly, they're on a mission to hunt them down.
Man, before I sat down to watch this, I was totally expecting Chucky's kid to be just as lethal—maybe even more of a total psycho than the old man himself—but honestly? I was pretty shocked by how much they turned out to be the complete opposite. It’s like, you expect all this dark energy, right? But then, everything flips right at the end when they finally take Chucky out and drop that line like, "There! You wanted me to be a man!" It's wild because it feels like they basically threw his own twisted logic right back in his face, and for a split second, it's like they actually snapped... but only for that one crazy moment.
So, I just finished watching, and honestly? I’m kind of digging the whole storyline and Glen’s character. It really feels like they were intentional about keeping Chucky as the main attraction, which is probably why his son is such a little sweetheart. That final scene where Glen becomes a "real boy"—you know, like that Pinocchio moment where he finally isn't a doll anymore—was actually pretty wild. And man, that closing shot? Absolutely perfect. It stays totally true to the spirit of the franchise: you just can't kill Chucky.

All things considered, even this fifth and final installment managed to hit the mark enough to make it worth your time.

My rating: 5/10
R.I.P.D. (2013) in Movies ·
Man, Bridges and Reynolds make such a killer acting duo! 👍

I mean, I’m honestly expecting anything at this point except for a bad movie, but hey, we’ll just have to wait up and see when it finally hits theaters.