I’m almost ready to say this movie blew me away. The production design and costumes? A perfect ten. The opulence, the energy, the dancing... that’s exactly what I look for in a musical. I’m glad they finally (
after so many versions) worked in the actual arias from the stage show—but that’s also where they missed the mark.
Kudos to Gerard, he really gave it his all, 🙏 but the director should have respected the original script a bit more (
since the Phantom is supposed to be around 50 years old). They should have cast an experienced singer for the lead (
it would have made the vocals so much more impactful) instead of just picking young, pretty Hollywood stars to pack the theaters.
Christina—the supplements claim she actually sings in the film; if that’s true, good for her... because in some parts, her
singing (
lip-syncing) didn't feel convincing at all.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
There are tons of different takes on the Phantom, and here is what I’ve seen:
The Silent one from
1925—what else can I say? It’s a classic drama, the Phantom looks like a vampire, and Lon Chaney’s performance is absolutely masterful!
. . 
I also watched the '83 adaptation. I’d call it a looser interpretation of the Phantom, but it was interesting and unique specifically because it deviates so much from the source material.
Whatever you do, don't watch the '98 horror version unless you're looking for blood, sadistic tearing, and organs being sliced up... plus some pretty unappealing nudity.

If you have the stomach for a mashup of Freddy Krueger and the Phantom, there's one from '89. I had to skip through parts because I didn't have the patience to sit through the whole thing, but I have to admit, it has the most original masquerade ball ever filmed!
The Phantom from '43—this is an unparalleled spectacle 🙏 and I think every
Phantom of the Opera fan needs to see it. An adaptation where you truly get to enjoy the fun and the luxury. The scene where he gets disfigured by acid really got to me; that part actually made me cry...

My only gripe is that the Phantom's character felt unfinished, and his mask was too simple and forgettable.
The '62 version has everything the '43 version lacks—a dark, gloomy atmosphere and realistic characters with real problems,
unpolished. I think this one portrays the Phantom's suffering and psychological profile most intensely. The way they link echoes of the past to the current plot is very intelligent. For me, this is the best Phantom film.
.
.