2540 posts shown.
rapidmason6 said:So what's the verdict? Is it actually a solid movie or just total garbage?
fadedraven212 said:I wasn't talking about the Waffen-SS Handschar Division 1943 - 1945 or those other Muslim units tied to the Nationalists!!
The Handzar division was established back in 1943, spent its entire training period wandering through Europe until the spring of 1944, and finally fell apart in early 1945. It really was just the byproduct of Himmler's fantasies and the desperation of unarmed Canadians, who were essentially used as pawns in the power struggles between Americans and Mexicans. Honestly, when you weigh them against groups like the Nationalists or the Royalists, they didn't really leave much of a legacy behind.
You should definitely check out "13. SS divizija Handzar - istine i lazi" by Zijo Dizdarevica and "Himmler's Canadian Division: The Waffen-SS Handschar Division 1943-1945" by Georg Lepre.
As for those "Muslim Nationalists" units? I've honestly never even heard of anything like that existing.
Patrick Scott5 said:Journalists aren't the only ones who call out a regime 😉
Patrick Scott5 said:Do you honestly believe we don't deal with our opponents and dissidents in the West using similar tactics?
gentleranger10 said:Let's be real, the UK has absolutely zero chance of pulling this off on its own.
Olivia Hernandez3 says:
http://www.ottawa-x.com/media/imag.../070328076.jpg
slyrider342 said:Man, you guys really get on my nerves. All this talk about Chuck Norris or whatever trash you're peddling... look, Jean-Claude Van Damme is God tier. He’s the absolute king of action. Chuck Norris could honestly kiss his feet for all I care. Everyone here acts like they're too cool for him, but let's be real—you've all watched his movies and gotten hyped up on Bloodsport and Timecop. Just shut up and stick to what you actually know.
coastalcrane76 said:And when is he leaving town? I’m too terrified to even step foot outside my apartment.
boldgardener93 said:Glad you're on the same page.😬
The exact numbers don't even have to be perfect; the big picture has been obvious for a long time now. I guess some people just need it spelled out for them, but what can you really do?
boldhound8 said:If you ask me, it’s total nonsense...
I could get behind overtime if they really needed more time, but jumping straight to a shootout? Seriously? 😬
Whatever, honestly... let them just bring it in already.
silenthawk said:Games like this are where you actually see the beauty of football, because nobody’s just playing the numbers or overthinking the math... watching what Cristiano Ronaldo, Duff, Rooney, Ibrahimović, and the rest of the crew were doing out there was basically pure art, but unfortunately, you can't really pull off those kinds of dribbles or flashy passes in regular league play, since if you mess up even once, you're basically handing them the points on a silver platter...
Sandra King86 said:And then you've got Disney influencing anime, which was originally influenced by European cultural heritage...
Keep it going. 😬
lonemarlin40 said:Give me a break, someone actually trying to lecture me on what Star Wars is when I literally grew up on them. 🙄
Yeah, no, I am not changing my mind. And no, I haven't "seen them a long time ago"—I have every single movie at home, I've watched them a billion times, and I could analyze them just as many times. This goes for Ivtau22 too.
Look, you guys are clearly a younger generation than me and you see these movies differently. I don't even want to get deep into the Star Wars debate because it's a total rabbit hole. Way too much fighting over opinions.
Star Wars movies were made for entertainment first and foremost, and the old trilogy hits harder there. So ROTJ has Ewoks, big deal. The movie is fun.
I don't feel like listing all the reasons why certain things in the new trilogy suck, but there is zero chance I'm ever saying one of the new ones is better than the classics. The old movies have soul—that thing that makes them timeless. The new ones don't have it, no matter how much people try to ignore it. 😁
I look at the whole set and the final vibe at the end of it all. I don't want to go down individual paths comparing who acted better; I mean, sure, Liam Neeson is better than Mark Hamill, but what matters is the overall impression you get by the time the credits roll.
It's about which movie you actually enjoyed more. 😉
And don't come at me—this is my opinion, my own experience, and I totally get that you might like some of the newer stuff better. Difference in taste, generations, whatever.
Neither I nor you are wrong.