lonehawk8 said:I found it pretty gripping, though I honestly got so lost that I couldn't tell where reality ended and the dream began. Here’s how I pieced it all together: there was a car crash involving Nora, she passed away, and he was left physically broken. He started having those dreams that night while he was running toward Sophia's place, where he ended up staying overnight. What are your thoughts?
Well, by the end of the movie, that "avatar" figure, E. L. E, explains that his perception was essentially hijacked the morning after his intoxication.
It’s classic sci-fi, I suppose, though it is certainly told through a somewhat unconventional lens, but then again, I guess that was likely the director's intention all along.
It’s a solid enough movie regardless of how you categorize it, though if I’m being forced to pick a side, I suppose I’d lean toward Sci-Fi; at least with that genre, I feel like I know what I'm getting into.
It seems to me that the lower volume levels are most noticeable when one attempts to watch a movie featuring 6-channel surround sound on a standard stereo setup, where essentially only the two front channels are being utilized.
Regarding extracting audio from an .avi file, I suppose I relied on an older version of Adobe Premiere. As for dealing with mp4 files, you might want to try using Handbrake. If you select Audio, then pick the specific audio format used in your film—which is typically AAC—you can go into the Volume control section to slightly boost the levels before encoding it. After that, I guess you could just swap it out for the original audio track using MKVToolNix .
If you have a DivX (.avi) file, I suppose you could extract the audio and load it into mp3DirectCut. Once that's done, if you navigate to the Edit menu and select Normalize..., you can save the processed audio and then just mux it back into the original video file.
It has been officially confirmed that this will be hitting theaters in 3D during the summer of 2013: http://news.yahoo.com/spielbergs-jur...150338334.html> Additionally, I suppose filming for Jurassic Park 4 is scheduled to begin this coming summer as well.
I suppose I occasionally use the video capture feature within KMPlayer to convert .mkv files into .avi format, mainly because I need them to work on an older line-based DVD/DivX player. It seems like a better way to avoid taxing my aging, lower-spec PC with heavy encoding tasks. While I have noticed that PotPlayer actually handles this process somewhat more efficiently, there is a persistent issue when attempting to capture video via an analog TV tuner card; specifically, the input resolution seems strictly limited to a maximum of 320x240, whereas KMPlayer doesn't seem to impose any such restrictions.
If I had to pick from all these different options, I suppose I’d say KMPlayer is the superior choice, primarily because—aside from the standard features everyone else seems to include—it actually offers a decent video capture option. It does struggle slightly when it comes to handling internet streams, though I guess you could argue VLC Media Player is probably better suited for that specific task, but I don't think that's a major failing on its part. Then there is PotPlayer, which seems to be almost an exact replica of the former.
Yes, there is a series The Crow: Stairway to Heaven (TV Series 1998) , I suppose, though they essentially just scraped the surface, and it really isn't quite the same thing.
No, I suppose it’s more likely that everyone complaining about the speed will just be sent over to him, and then once they finally make it back here, they might actually feel like this thing is flying like crazy. 😁
Before you go ahead and upload any photos to sites like Imgur or similar hosting services, I suppose it might be wise to use some kind of image editing software on your PC, such as Adobe Photoshop or maybe even GIMP, to reduce the file size before you attempt the upload. If you could just let us know which specific program you are using on your computer, then perhaps we could provide you with some more detailed guidance. Furthermore, if your intention is for other forum members to view the image at its true, full scale—since it will likely exceed the maximum dimensions allowed here—you should simply paste the direct link instead of embedding it within tags,like this: http://i40.tinypic.com/35bxaps.jpg. That way, I guess people can just click on the link to see the original version.
I suppose you should really try to stick to images that aren't larger than 640x640, because they tend to stretch out the forum page quite awkwardly. If they happen to be bigger than that, maybe just leave the direct link instead.
