Posts by mistyotter35

I suppose I’m also quite curious about this, since common sense would lead one to believe that the image with a higher line count is inherently the superior one.

Ronald Chavez7 said:...Edit: I think I finally managed to fix the issue with those Swap L&R video channels.

Yeah, I suppose that should be fine now. 👍

Yes, I just went ahead and double-checked, and your left-right settings seem perfectly fine on your video. I suppose I find this whole YouTube error somewhat perplexing, given that I haven't really encountered these kinds of issues before, even when opting for the red/cyan viewing mode.
I did take some time to look through the rest of the films on your channel—they are quite impressive, I must say—but it seems they all suffer from this same left-right discrepancy.
I wonder if you perhaps filled out the > correctly? (yt3d:enable=true yt3d:aspect=16:9 yt3d: swap=true)
For instance, this particular video doesn't seem to have the problem: Central Park, , though I should note it was produced using the Under / Over format.

James Turner3 said:It’s all quite alright, I suppose, though I should probably mention that my colors were defaulted to an incorrect setting for glasses with a red left lens and a blue right lens. I managed to rectify the situation by clicking the toggle located within the 3D options at the bottom of the video player; the alternative setting simply reverses the lens configuration.
I suppose I should probably post this here, just in case anyone else runs into issues with the image quality.

I suppose you're right about that. It seems my colleague made a mistake and swapped the image positions in his stereo video.

ruggedotter41 said:I suppose my absolute favorite 3D film has to be How to Train Your Dragon 3D, though I have to wonder what adults are even looking for in those kinds of movies.
I guess I should probably mention this video found on YouTube, though I suspect much of the discussion surrounding it might be somewhat misplaced. It’s one of those clips that seems to invite a certain level of scrutiny, if one is inclined to look closely at the technical execution. I suppose it's worth noting, even if I find the overall presentation a bit lacking in certain areas. It isn't actually 3D, though I suppose it is still pretty cool.

I suppose you were referring to this?I suppose I should probably share this link to the How to Train Your Dragon 3D trailer, though I can't be entirely certain if the quality will hold up for everyone. It seems like a decent enough look at what they're planning for the release.

If you’ve ever sat through "It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia," then you probably realize that Chuck is nothing short of legendary. 😁
I heard some rumors that his audition performance absolutely blew the judges away.

Can you even imagine these guys showing up in an impossible show? 😁 Maybe just a thought.

Goran Navojec.....................Miraj Grbić

The issue, I suppose, is that this particular subject has been dissected countless times before in various guises, and more often than not, it just devolves into these endless, circular arguments where everyone tries to lecture one another. It seems to me that people simply roll their eyes whenever a topic emerges that feels even remotely similar to something we've already covered.

If it weren't for the fact that MGM is involved, I probably would have assumed this was some cheap production from Asylum. It’s honestly getting a bit ridiculous, the way they've been messing around with those fairy tales lately...

The link isn't working for me: Mirror Mirror - official trailer International
I suppose it does look a bit like some sort of parody.

In order to prevent this entire thing from descending into complete chaos, particularly regarding those political (supposedly "funny") caricatures appearing in the Funny photo thread, 😁

And I suppose this will be their absolute peak: 2 Shark Attack (2012)
A two-headed shark and Carmen Electra... 😂

The A/V forum is located further down, but it covers more general topics. I suppose that’s why, in my view, this really falls under the IT/Software umbrella, so maybe a new thread should be started specifically for finished animations. In other words, you probably ought to have opened a thread with that kind of specific focus.

If you ask me, this really belongs under: Reddit > Information Technology > Software

I suppose one could argue that active systems are the only ones offering true full resolution, whereas everything else falls into the passive category—meaning you get less eye strain, better brightness, and no annoying crosstalk, and so on. But then again, as I mentioned before, my colleague doesn't really care about those technicalities anymore, since he’s already gone out and bought both the TV and the glasses. At this point, I guess he's just focused on finding actual content to watch.

Is it actually a circle? Or more like a cross? 😁
I suppose it really depends on the specific film and whatever tech you're using to watch it, but fundamentally, I don't think it's particularly harmful. One just shouldn't overdo it, I guess—you can't exactly spend the entire day binge-watching 3D movies.

I suppose there isn't much point in trying to explain the nuances between passive and active systems to him, given that he already owns a 3DTV and the necessary glasses. It seems to me that such technical distinctions aren't really his concern; his only real priority is simply downloading the movie in a stereo format. As far as I can tell, the TV and the glasses will handle all the heavy lifting regarding everything else.

There seems to be quite a bit of ongoing debate regarding 3D and 3D TVs in various threads, but I suppose it’s worth noting that if you want to watch 3D videos on YouTube, you don't actually need a 3DTV; you really just need a pair of glasses.

I suppose I'm a bit confused as to what specifically interests you regarding 3D content on YouTube. Perhaps this could potentially serve as a topic for discussion, provided that a moderator decides to update the title accordingly...

I find myself suggesting once again that you all steer clear of that guy's reviews, mostly because he is just incredibly tedious, irritating, and seems to find fault with absolutely everything.
I suppose it might be better if you just decide for yourselves what is worth watching.

Visually speaking, the trailer doesn't look half bad, though I suppose they really ought to avoid that overly melodramatic acting style typical of some American productions.