Posts by Gary Patel

Frank Sinatra?
I'm saying this from memory—lol.

Absolutely stunning film. Honestly, I’d rank it among the absolute best I’ve ever seen—just top-tier stuff. The plot, the acting, the score... everything hits perfectly. Even though the story itself isn't exactly groundbreaking, it feels so incredibly fresh because the execution is just that seamless—you don't even notice the tropes. There isn't a single dull moment in the whole thing. I was genuinely bummed when I saw how much it struggled at the US box office, but honestly? That doesn't matter. It's a beautiful, imaginative masterpiece that deserves every bit of your time.

Maybe silentsailor5 isn't even human!😲

Hands down, my absolute favorite romance—and honestly, probably one of the best films I’ve ever seen. That soundtrack? Just incredible.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YuUKnIvUAFk
😍

Finally, Disney is returning to classic animation! Personally, I’ve always been much more of a fan of 2D hand-drawn styles over the whole 3D look—it just has that certain charm, you know? They’ve tweaked the story a bit (if I recall correctly, she doesn't turn into a frog in the original version) and they're featuring a Black princess for the first time. I am definitely checking this one out.🍿

I definitely need to check this out. Looks awesome!😍

Wolverine is my absolute favorite—honestly, that trilogy is just pure, unadulterated action from start to finish...

redmarlin3 said:Yeah, I mean, what you wrote is mostly accurate if we’re just looking at this from a purely practical standpoint. 😁

Look, nobody is stopping you from making fun of someone or something; if you haven't noticed by now, about 75% of the posts on this Reddit rules board consist of people just mocking their interlocutors.

If it's done in a clever way, then sure, it can be entertaining and witty.

But when it's done the way you just did it, then it's... oh well, it's just mindless mockery that says way more about the person writing it than the person they're actually trying to target. 😁

I’m not quite sure why you’re trying to justify your posting style here. Look, I have nothing against anyone having grievances with certain groups, and I certainly don't mind people sharing their opinions on those matters. If someone, for instance, holds a specific view regarding same-sex marriage or adoption, that is their right—and they should be able to state it freely without fear of being penalized. However, if that expression turns into insults and ridicule, then it really ought to be sanctioned—because, let's face it, nobody enjoys being mocked like that, and I truly believe such behavior warrants a penalty. I'm all for jokes that are funny and don't cross the line, but I'm not for this—and honestly, if I had phrased my examples the way you did (I was just being sarcastic!), I’m certain I would have been handed a warning card. In my view, the moderators—who are supposed to serve as a sort of moral compass, assuming they earned their positions through their own conduct—shouldn't be letting this slide. I realize things might not change and that these behaviors often go unpunished, but I have to say, I'm quite disappointed in you 🙂 and, generally speaking, in how this forum and its leadership are being handled. Moving forward, I'll see you as someone who mocks people with differing views—or at least someone who enables that mockery (though I can't tell if you're doing the mocking yourself right now). And yeah, I won't WHINE anymore, but—well, this is a big "no" from me, Bu-Bu.

redmarlin3 said:Oh, please, stop whining 🙄about what exactly makes this post so terrible that it deserves a ban?
(Since my subforum is apparently getting dragged into this debate anyway.)

Mocking vegetarians in such a morbid way? That’s a bit much—isn't it?🤷
Look, I’ll lay it out plainly—if you want to keep a man, you have to satisfy him orally. It’s really that simple—it’s either that, or you're looking at smoking or a breakup. 😂😂

That’s just how you liberals play it—it's all a zero-sum game with you. If you want society to stay safe from total collapse, then you really ought to stop pushing for adoption rights. Because if you keep at it, those kids are going to end up just like you—gay—and we'll all be headed straight for the grave. That seems to be the choice you're offering us: either ban adoption entirely, or face extinction. That's the liberal way, isn't it?😂😂

Listen, folks—if you actually want to preserve our culture and ensure our heritage doesn't just fade away, then you’ve got to stop intermarrying with other races. Based on the statistics out there, the white population is shrinking, leaving behind nothing but mixed-race individuals.😂😂It’s essentially the same thing—either we're looking at the end of racial mixing or the disappearance of the white race altogether. 😂😂

Anything else?

So, am I getting banned or am I walking away scot-free as a moderator? Or maybe you’re going to hand me a strike for trolling and going off-topic? Honestly—not that I’ll actually go hunting for better examples up the thread, because that sounds like way too much work—but I could find them if I wanted to. But look, please don't tell me to stop "whining" or questioning what warrants a penalty—because if you do, I’ll just start mocking you. I'll take your post as direct evidence for why I shouldn't be punished, okay? So, thanks a million, sweetheart—now I have the perfect setup to poke fun at everyone else. You really have no idea HOW much you've helped me here.

steelskipper5 said:Look, you don't need to me explain how Alternative is moderated.
Or how the admins react when people complain about that kind of moderation.

All I can do is hope that anyone with half a brain takes this whole mess as a clear sign to stay far away from the absolute bottom of this forum's barrel.

😍
Some girl I know from the Teens told me she saw you—honestly, I'm a little jealous!😢
And yeah, I think one moderator actually claimed that the mods on this PDF are untouchable. Personally? I'm all for implementing penalties for moderators. Now, I know—before you even say it—that some will argue most people like how things are run (but if "most" just means a handful of mods, then Gauss is probably turning in his grave), but letting this kind of stuff slide while that woman is still a moderator? That definitely doesn't sit right with the majority.
So, I’m voting for actual penalties for mods, or at the very least, letting them go—I mean, we're in a recession, you can always find an excuse to downsize! It's time to finally deal with the moderation issues over at Alternative. Because the MAJORITY does not agree with how this forum is being handled, and the whole structure needs a makeover before people start filing actual legal complaints and formal grievances. This isn't a threat or some subtle hint that I'm going to do it myself, but seriously—if you keep going like this, you won't last long. There are people out there ready to take action, and word is they already have (at least according to the rumors). Just some friendly advice. 😘

Over on the student corner, there's already a thread about the SAT. But from what I've seen—and I might be wrong here—most of the talk is just about how the exam itself is organized. People aren't really diving into the actual content—you know, the stuff we actually need to study. So, I was wondering: could we open a sub-forum for the SAT that features a dedicated thread for every single subject tested? On those threads, using the official catalogs released by the College Board, we could discuss exactly what's coming our way for each subject—like what specifically is covered, what we need to master, and what we can skip. Honestly, those catalogs aren't always super detailed; they don't exactly give us a clear roadmap of what to learn. To be blunt—if I have a question about psychology, it feels a bit silly to go hunting through a PDF just to find an answer. I'd much rather get that info right there in the thread.

I can't help myself—I am just absolutely thrilled with my own face and work. 🙂

I don't think I'm going to make it to the concert—work and money issues, you know how it goes...😢
I really wish I could be there, though.🙂

I'm not sure if it's actually the best—it might just be my absolute favorite—but What's a man without a mustache?

It really depends on the specific situation—I mean, I think people tend to blow things way out of proportion when we talk about mental health issues. If we're looking at a condition that isn't harmful to anyone else or doesn't significantly impact the individual's daily life—then why not? Let them be.

Steven Clark2 said:😕 Are you being serious right now? Where exactly did Solomon insult atheists? Please, show me. 😕 Regarding his statement about condemning atheism... what exactly did he mean by that? 🤷 What about the atheists? Regardless, let’s not forget that he is an Orthodox Christian. At times, it might seem like some of his statements come across as harsher than what he actually intended when he sat down to write them. I am certainly not trying to defend him, but I know from my own experience that I have struggled with this while posting here; sometimes things are said in the heat of the moment rather than being a true reflection of one's thoughts.

It makes me quite sad. Should I really start pulling random quotes about believers being narrow-minded or backward? Should I bring up how many times we have been mocked and underestimated? Or perhaps list all the negative criticism leveled against us—how people call us names, labeling us hypocrites or liars without providing a shred of evidence? If that is the case, why didn't you speak up when you saw such injustice before? And tell me, will you continue to remain silent when you see similar behavior happening here on the forum?

The core issues and disagreements here are only intensifying—more and more every day. Why? There are several reasons, and I don't want to simply repeat myself. Let’s be clear: this situation is never going to resolve itself just by appointing yet another moderator or implementing minor tweaks. Honestly, there are highly intellectual and deeply educated individuals on this forum, particularly among the Christians, who aren't blind to what is happening and will speak up just as I am doing now. It is truly baffling that Radeta was awarded 500 points simply because a moderator grew bored with the discussion and couldn't find a way to push back. We are talking about 500 points handed out for sheer nonsense—something that wouldn't even earn 10 points under normal circumstances. Do you see the fundamental problem here? This is an issue that our administration needs to take far more seriously than they currently are. When someone gets 10 points and a red card, it might just be a moderator making a mistake; no big deal, nothing catastrophic. But when someone receives 500 points—especially someone who isn't being insulting or provocative—that is an administrative matter. It is only a matter of time before all of this reflects on the community in a much more serious way.

Rebecca Rivera2 also received 500 points undeservedly, along with a warning prior to being banned, as if they were some notorious forum troublemaker. When I read about this, I felt a genuine sense of alarm and sadness; quite frankly, I am at a loss for words. Why did this happen? Simply because they hold a worldview that is fundamentally different from Nicole James, whose presence seems to constantly loom over them, openly pointing out certain things. Granted, perhaps Nicole James reacted impulsively, but handing out 500 points and such a severe warning is, in my estimation, an absolute disgrace.

What is truly the worst part of all this—I haven't seen a single well-reasoned explanation anywhere as to why such massive "rewards" are being handed out, especially regarding Radeta. Honestly, people, he is Mexican and an Orthodox Christian; surely we ought to be looking out for someone like him a bit more? We don't exactly have many of his kind represented here on the forum. It is such a shame what has been done to him—who is going to make this right? Does anyone ever actually step up and apologize for something like this?

Then why don't you come over here and tell me exactly how Solomon or centurionix insult atheists?

Are atheists being insulted on this forum? I’m certain they are, but I believe there is a fundamental difference in how things are handled here. It isn't quite right when someone repeatedly calls Rebecca Rivera2 an idiot—and doesn't even receive a warning—yet when Rebecca Rivera2 calls someone else a whiner, they are instantly hit with a 500-point penalty. I would sincerely appreciate it if someone could explain to me exactly where I am mistaken. I realize I might be wrong, but I have gained significant experience on this platform. I have participated in seven or eight different sub-forums with varying subject matter, and I feel quite confident in my ability to engage in respectful dialogue with Catholics, Protestants, or any other group. I would truly value it if a moderator or administrator—specifically those in charge—could point out exactly where my reasoning fails.

Please, don't misinterpret my intentions; I haven't been opening up about you at all. I am simply sharing what is truly on my mind. 😍

I actually tried explaining this to you in another thread a few days ago—can't recall which one, honestly—but it’s clearly a lost cause! Look, it doesn't mean a thing if someone claims, "I'm a Christian," if they've completely turned their back on Christ's ways. To me, that person is effectively an atheist—they're basically in the same boat. And let's be real: historically speaking, everyone was religious in some capacity until people decided to stop believing in God. That's how we got atheists! Also... please don't try to tell me the US is a land of "wonderful religious altruists." Atheism, with all its messy consequences, dominates our media, schools, and political institutions. It shapes the American consciousness and captures the minds and souls of the vast majority—not everyone, obviously—especially the youth here in the States. It directs their very spirits. I'm telling you, it's the inevitable result of a slow drift toward atheism across the board: politically, spiritually, culturally, educationally—every single level.
I truly find it hard to believe that it's this difficult to find someone on this forum who doesn't think in extremes. If I express a negative opinion about the overtly secular lifestyle most people lead today, why does that automatically mean I have to hate or despise someone? I am a Christian, and I don't harbor hatred for anyone. If I criticize a phenomenon that I believe is taking a deadly toll on society, and someone takes offense, that's on them—but they have no right to generalize and paint my entire perspective with a broad brush.

So, in your view, insulting Christianity doesn't count as insulting Christians? Come on, please.
Look, I'm not talking about race; I'm talking about skin color. If an argument insults the idea of atheism, then it naturally insults atheists too, because it's clear those influenced by atheism are being hit by a negative concept. You can keep defending it if you want, but just don't. And as for Parsifal, I don't want any quote-posts.
For instance, Jacob really gets on my nerves with his threads where he mocks and insults theists—but then again, the theists who do the exact same thing irritate me just as much.

It seems like only Christians get insulted, but that's just not true. In the last few threads, it's been nothing but atheists getting targeted, yet no one is being penalized. This all comes down to individual character. You have both theists and atheists who are decent people and don't insult others or their beliefs, and then you have those who just do it. It bugs me that in these kinds of complaints, Christians are always portrayed as the sole victims, even though we can all see that atheists are attacked just as often. Neither side gets a pass, really. Sure, anyone can get a warning—myself included—but you're being way too subjective by thinking atheists get special treatment. If you look closely, theists get breaks too. Honestly, I think we're at a point where atheists are being insulted more frequently while no one gets punished.

Both sides deal with unfairness, but what saddens me more is seeing people think like Solomon 🙂. I'm not even as angry about the inconsistent enforcement of rules as I am saddened by this negative view of atheism—this habit of painting the entire American population in such a bad light. And then these people call themselves atheists just out of spite, simply because they're being difficult, whereas theists wouldn't act that way. I just don't get this blanket negativity toward atheists, vegetarians, Black people, homosexuals, or even theists coming from the atheist side.😢

I don't really mind the unfair banning—I mean, at the end of the day, this is just an online forum and I shouldn't let it get to me—but what actually bothers me is seeing so many people clinging to those old prejudices. It's wild that in the 21st century, we still have theists and atheists clashing like it's some ancient battlefield.😢

It’s the types like Jacob or Solomon who really take things way too far.

Honestly? I think the unfair bans and how the moderators handle things are actually the least of our problems here.

Solomon Kan said:Real Americans—or really, anyone else out there—who actually live by their faith aren't what I'd call atheists or fake believers. For any true believer, morality is the absolute cornerstone of their faith. My issue isn't with the faithful; it's with the hypocrisy of those who claim to believe but don't walk the walk. Honestly, I see those hypocrites as being on the same level as atheists—they’re living lives without God at their core. While they try to separate the sin from the person, I find "atheism as an ideology" itself to be fundamentally destructive. It's just a flawed idea, plain and simple.
If I'm a Christian and you happen to be Catholic, Muslim, or Jewish, but we both strictly follow the moral principles our faiths demand, then neither of us is an atheist, right? There is a Being in our lives we call God—we believe in Him, live through Him, and share essentially the same core values... that’s just not the case for atheists or for people playing dress-up with their faith. It’s different.

centurionix said:For Christians, morality is absolute; for atheists, it's relative.

To a Christian, murder is murder—period. Full stop.
But for an atheist—or even a believer who has totally abandoned their conscience (and yes, I’m grouping non-believers together with believers who don't actually practice what they preach)—murder isn't always seen as murder.

Just look at the Ten Commandments, which were rooted in conscience. You'll see that someone who doesn't actually live their faith won't respect a single commandment; they just bend them to justify whatever they're doing.
Murder is murder, but abortion? Not so much.
Adultery becomes an "adventure"...
Stealing isn't stealing unless you get caught...
Lying is just viewed as normal human behavior...
And honoring your parents? That's optional, basically...
I could go on all day...

Enough said?

Look, just take a glance at the posts from Solomon, Parsifal, centurionix, and their crowd—the way they go after atheists. Especially Solomon and Parasfil. Not a single one of them has been penalized. It’s not just the Christians who feel insulted here. Sure, maybe some moderators are getting a bit too subjective—punishing people who happen to share their views when they break a rule—but I don't think there's some grand conspiracy against Christians in general. Is the Religion PDF designed primarily to spread atheism and such? Maybe. And are the mods occasionally being overly biased? Definitely. But then again, lately, almost every thread is about atheism, most of them started by Christians, where atheism is insulted in a totally rude way and nobody gets banned. I'm not saying Christianity holds a higher status on Religion, but it often feels like the very people complaining about Nicole James are the same ones insulting atheists or starting debates meant to question atheist morality.

feraltrucker5 said:Is "drama queen" behavior the new trend around here? 😕 Not really—honestly, it’s been the status quo since 1999. 😬

And maybe learn when to use because, versus when to use right 😛

Besides, we can't exactly spill the details—they'd have to assassinate us first! 😁

I only realized what happened once I saw I couldn't edit my post. RArely happens to me, though. Still, I am George Washington.😳