CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Ronald Allen › Posts

Posts by Ronald Allen

188 posts shown.

Bank Secrecy Act regulations in Banking, Insurance & Loans ·
Jacob Long said:What I really want to know is if there’s any way to stop banks from digging through everything—like, can we skip the whole process of showing them the entire ownership chain all the way down to the actual humans at the top?

I haven't actually sat down to read the Bank Secrecy Act myself, but the bank keeps waving it in my face to demand all this info.

The parent company is owned by another firm, which is owned by someone else, and so on... it's a massive conglomerate, so things get messy fast.

Is this kind of thing standard practice across the European Union too?

I mean, I don't think you can dodge this stuff. If there were huge loopholes like that in financial regulations, they wouldn't bother passing the laws in the first place, and banks wouldn't be able to hide behind the institutions operating under them.
And as for the European Union... yeah, I'm pretty sure it's the same deal there. They have to check all that stuff, you know, things like terrorism financing and whatever else.
Personal loan ads: Legit or scam? in Banking, Insurance & Loans ·
Lisa Taylor2 said:Has anyone here actually dealt with an offer like this before—has anyone tried to actually pull the trigger on one?

Any insight you guys have would be huge.
Thanks in advance for the heads-up!

Here’s the exact junk I got in my inbox:

We offer private, business, and personal loans with incredibly low annual interest rates—as low as 3%. We provide loans ranging from $1,000 to $2,000,000. Generally, we offer:

LOAN TERMS

1. The borrower must be at least 18 years old.
2. The agreement signing process for this transaction must be handled through my attorney.
3. The loan will be sent to you via JPMorgan Chase wire transfer or check, depending on your preference.
4. The borrower must be prepared to repay the loan within the specified term, which will be verified by signing the legal paperwork/loan agreement.
5. The debtor must have steady employment to satisfy my requirements regarding repayment capability.
6. The interest rate is 3%.
If you agree to the terms above, please fill out the following form.

Borrower's W-2 Form

If you run into any difficulties filling out the form, simply click the link at the bottom of your email application to complete it.
SECTION I

NAME:
CONTACT ADDRESS:
NATIONALITY:
COUNTRY:
DATE OF BIRTH:
GENDER:
MARITAL STATUS:
CURRENT JOB TITLE:
Your Company Name OR Business Owner:
Social Security Number:
ZIP Code / Country Code: Fax: Telephone: (Office):
Next of kin:
NEXT OF KIN ADDRESS:
TEL (Home):
FAX:
SECTION II

Requested Loan Amount:
PROPOSED LOAN TERM:
PURPOSE OF LOAN:
Monthly Income:
Do you have any ASSETS:

NOTE: you must COMPLETE THIS FORM AND RETURN it along with a scanned

COPY of one of the following forms of IDENTITY

(i) US PASSPORT
(ii) Driver's License
(iii) WORK ID
(iv) State ID
(v) GOVERNMENT IDENTITY CARD

Best Regards.

Mr. Johnson & Johnson

🤣🤣🤣
Which gentleman Reckitt are we talking about here? Is it the one making Aquaphor for limescale, or the guy behind OxiClean for stain removal...? Or maybe the one responsible for Lysol to get rid of grease and grime...? 🤔
I mean, since all that stuff sits right there in the bathroom, and you're busy doing your business, I guess all those labels on the products you keep in there seem pretty hilarious to you—at least to me! 😁
So, here’s my friendly little tip: head over to the restroom, grab any one of those two products, and check the side of the bottle to see exactly WHO AND WHAT "Reckitt" actually is... 😲

Man, I'm just gonna hurt myself thinking about the crazy ideas people come up with!!!!! 😂😂😂
Overdrafts and negative balances: What's allowed? in Banking, Insurance & Loans ·
Nicholas Turner said:Even though everything is automated, I’m convinced "Headquarters" still holds the keys to unlock certain features—you know, just so those high rollers that > hangs out with can get exactly what they want. 😁

For instance, I have a colleague over at Wells Fargo who is sitting on a deficit of about 45 $0.00, yet her pay fluctuates around $2333.

That’s true, but honestly, because of client privacy, I’d rather not dive into that.
Rules exist just to be broken or bypassed... 😳
Overdrafts and negative balances: What's allowed? in Banking, Insurance & Loans ·
Gregory Williams7 said:I believe that deduction depends on age, salary, and consistency.

For instance, if a woman earns roughly $5000 and is 50 years old, it is entirely realistic that she would be granted a $40k bonus.

If she had 100 years of work history and a salary of $27, I still couldn't give her a credit limit higher than $12.
Overdrafts and negative balances: What's allowed? in Banking, Insurance & Loans ·
shadowpilot8 said:unknown - I have an account at Bank of America with a pretty substantial overdraft limit. I've never actually gone into the red, but they slashed my limit by $333 this month. I was talking to a colleague yesterday who had a $20000 overdraft limit at JP Morgan Chase and stayed within his bounds, yet they dropped him down to 40,000 this month too. He called the Bank of America, and they claimed it was due to the recession.

Aren't you exaggerating those numbers a little bit...? 🤔
You mean from 6,000 to 4,000?

And I am definitely not even going to comment on that excuse. ☕
Overdrafts and negative balances: What's allowed? in Banking, Insurance & Loans ·
Gregory Williams7 said:Everyone knows the deal. Or, at least, those who don't know tend to make assumptions. The reality is that no one can give you a guaranteed answer regarding what you will receive, even if you consult with a personal banker at JPMorgan Chase.

In my experience, it usually takes a few years before you are cleared from a blacklist. But again, as I mentioned, any attempt to guess is pure speculation. It is like asking a butcher how much money it costs to hook up a house to the power grid. Your best move? Pick up the phone and call your banker, or simply walk into a branch to speak with them in person. That is the only way to get a definitive answer.

JPMorgan Chase doesn't have "personal bankers" for this kind of stuff, and they don't really care about these details. I know every bank uses different job titles, so just to be clear.
He wasn't talking about a credit blacklist, because getting on one works differently. This is strictly an internal bank-client matter where they flag you for "messy business" because you didn't cover account fees on time.


Anthony Myers5 said:The teller at JPMorgan Chase told me I have to wait a certain amount of time—she wasn't entirely sure how long, exactly—since apparently their system dictates the timeline...
I was digging through the online banking instructions and found out this whole process is essentially what they call "scoring." It seems like the system tracks your activity for about 111 days after your first positive balance; if everything stays in the green, you're good to go...

I have an overdraft line of credit that I can't seem to extend. If I had maintained a clean account for those 111 days, the system would have automatically bumped my limit for another four months...

I was just wondering if anyone else here has run into similar issues—maybe someone could shed some light on how this works...
Thanks, everyone.

There's no way you read the word "scoring" or some so-called "111-day ultimatum" in the online banking manuals; someone just used those terms while talking to you at the teller window (I'm just wondering who that was...). Look, if your account is fine and you aren't causing these kinds of headaches, your overdraft gets automatically renewed for the same amount and the same period as before. If you mess up like this, your overall client score in the system drops, and then the credit request gets sent up to higher management for approval. Don't sweat it too much, it'll probably be approved again, you just gotta be careful...
Domestic transfers and payments in USD in Banking, Insurance & Loans ·
Sam Fowler20 said:Quick question here...
If I have an account at Chase in Miami but I need to send some money to someone with an account at Bank of America in New York, can I just head to a local post office or any Chase branch to do that, or do I specifically have to go to a Bank of America location??
Also, can I pay with cash instead of using my debit card?
Probably asking a silly question, but hey...
Thanks!

You can do it in either city, you just need the other person's account number. If you head over to Chase, you won't get hit with those extra payment fees.
And yeah, you can definitely pay with cash.
There's no such thing as a stupid question...
Good evening to you, too.

Look, I wiped your thread, along with a few others—not just on the main news board, but across the whole Politics section. You probably don't see why, but...

On the main board, there’s already a massive thread: Sanders resigned as Prime Minister and party leader. It’s sitting at 3,739 posts and 126,510 views right now (as of July 10, 10:20 PM). So, my take—and I'm pretty sure the rest of the mod team agrees—is that this single thread should be the one place we break down every move made by former Prime Minister Ivo Sanders and all the fallout from it. I mean, come on, it’s not smart to start a brand new thread every time Sanders sneezes, or whenever Kosor claims she's going to cut benefits and slash pensions. Especially not when some current minister, acting under this whole "save the citizens of the USA through intimidation" vibe, starts taking radical cost-cutting measures or spouting nonsense.

To make things actually work and keep discussions somewhat sane, maybe we can do this: let's open one more thread specifically for the facts and reasons behind the current Government's actions following Ivo Sanders's resignation. We'll pin that one to the top, alongside the existing big thread mentioned above. Honestly, the immediate drama will blow over pretty fast anyway, while the actual consequences are going to stick around longer, so we can just see how things play out for the country and here on Reddit later on.

So, I'm asking everyone posting in the Politics section to weigh in on this idea. Maybe we can actually find a middle ground that works for everyone.
When are banks finally going to start acting normal? in Banking, Insurance & Loans ·
Daniel Perez13 said:I don't get why you're getting so worked up. The idea of paying wages in cash envelopes instead of through banks is probably just a way to pressure banks into actually considering their impact on society and the economy.
It's a radical suggestion, but I wouldn't be surprised if a union eventually brought it up, mostly because banks aren't listening to anything right now.
I won't go into detail about why it's in the bank's interest to handle the payments, but they'd likely cave on several issues if they were actually threatened by an option like this.

Look, if we were living in Andorra, maybe that theory might actually fly. Or if, by some freak accident, we were some kind of emerging nation starting off with a perfect GDP, a massive budget surplus, and leaders sent over from other countries to run things.
But today? When over 70% of people are living in the red, when 58% of people are juggling at least two credit cards, and 45% are stuck with a mortgage or some kind of personal loan... discussing this theory is just insane. People managed to rack all that debt up specifically because their paychecks hit their checking accounts—and, honestly, because of how foolishly they chase a certain lifestyle they feel forced to maintain.
If we suddenly switched to cash in hand right now, half of them would completely ignore their bank overdrafts, and at least a third would start skipping out on their mortgage or car payments. Do I really have to explain where that leads...?

I'm not foaming at the mouth or anything, but I thought people might actually use their brains before jumping into these trolling debates.
When are banks finally going to start acting normal? in Banking, Insurance & Loans ·
Charles Martin78 said:Don't you worry, it’s all about to kick off. Ever since yesterday, people have already started pulling their savings out of the banks, and I suspect we'll see more and more of that happening as long as this tense atmosphere persists—especially if someone at the top decides to make some nasty "cost-cutting" moves.

At the same time, you can bet they'll hike up interest rates on loans, jack up those monthly service fees, and squeeze us for every penny under the guise of a "credit rating downgrade" or some other equally ridiculous excuse...

Throw in a few delayed paychecks or late Social Security payments, and well—it’s going to be absolute chaos out there...

And honestly? It's pure stupidity. Just like when they did the exact same thing right after a recession was announced, only to have to cough all that money back up two weeks later.
Usually, a crisis doesn't even hit for another 5 or 6 months, but since our government is basically teetering on the edge of bankruptcy, God help us!
Poll deleted: "Do you believe Tony Blair is leaving on his own? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
bluefalcon14 said:Fine... So what I said earlier wasn't about you specifically, it was about the mod team and their policies... In general, though, this mod crew just doesn't get what actually matters here... I guess the question is whether they're just clueless or if they're doing it on purpose...

If you really want to know, I shut the thread down because I'm sick to death of you guys starting a new topic for every little thing.
It’s not enough to have one massive thread covering everything happening with Bill Clinton, so now every single person feels the need to start their own separate thread just so their specific post can be "the main one."
In just one morning, the big Bill Clinton thread blew up with—get this—exactly 1,300 posts in a matter of hours! And what's the plan here? Start a new thread for every single news article? Just so the whole world revolves around Bill Clinton? I don't get it—if the main topic isn't bending to your will, you just decide to choke out the entire forum with redundant threads...? Can you guys not even hold a conversation unless you're the ones who kicked it off...? Is the crowd over at Mad House just "different" than the people on the main forum, so you all need your own special duplicate threads...?

Explain yourself clearly and make sense, then maybe we'll see...
When are banks finally going to start acting normal? in Banking, Insurance & Loans ·
Chris Stewart3 said:It seems every major bank in this country carries itself with the unearned arrogance of some higher power. One has to wonder if anyone will ever put an end to this condescending attitude toward the public.
For instance, it would be far more efficient if employers simply paid us in cash. That way, we wouldn't have to deal with banks bleeding citizens dry through endless transaction fees or dragging them into unnecessary overdraft territory just to manage basic expenses. Rather than actually providing financial education, they seem solely focused on stripping people of their hard-earned money, acting as if they practically own us.
Is there any way we can push for a meaningful shift in this relationship?

What kind of commission are you even talking about...?
If someone actually started paying your salary in cash, it would probably just mess up your relationship with the bank even more, because we all know what happens when you stop having regular deposits hitting your checking account.
It's not like banks are forcing people into overdrafts; people just choose to screw up their own finances, and the banks just sit there rubbing their hands together—it's a little bit of sweet satisfaction for them. It’s not that the banks bought us, it’s that we sold ourselves.

Chris Stewart3, man, this isn't Looney Tunes, so don't start trolling here too.

Seriously, give me a break... 🙂
Why was the forum feedback and suggestions thread closed? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Steven Clark2 said:I don't think that's even his problem. I mean, maybe, but honestly? I just don't see it being an issue on his end. 🙂 Not even close. You want to know what might be the issue? Maybe. I guess. 🙂

I'm listening.
Why was the forum feedback and suggestions thread closed? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Why are you guys even bothering to argue with him in the first place...?
Like, why are you even trying to justify yourselves to him?
I just don't get where he gets off thinking he actually knows how things work—and apparently, he's all upset that someone else is doing the moderating instead of him. ☕

As if he could do a better job... 😳
Best online payment cards? in Banking, Insurance & Loans ·
Brenda Taylor13 said:Oh, I see... so you're telling me Bank of America isn't registered for online shopping, which is why their VISA card won't work either?

Something like that, I guess.
Best online payment cards? in Banking, Insurance & Loans ·
Brenda Taylor13 said:So I’ve been reading through the threads here and I am honestly losing my mind—how does it even make sense that two identical VISA Electron cards aren't behaving the same way when I try to buy stuff online? I’ve got one from JP Morgan Chase that works perfectly fine, but then I try using this other one from Bank of America and—bam—total failure. Like, nothing. It just won't go through. I mean, isn't it the exact same thing? They are both VISA Electron cards! What does it matter which bank printed their logo on the plastic or whose name is staring back at me? If it’s a VISA Electron card designed by VISA, it should be universal, right? Regardless of whether it came from JP Morgan Chase or Bank of America? Or am I just being an idiot here...😕

You're wrong...

Bank of America isn't even set up for online transactions. JP Morgan Chase and Goldman Sachs are... honestly, it's pretty basic stuff. They just aren't as capable.
Domestic transfers and payments in USD in Banking, Insurance & Loans ·
Michael Perez83 said:Online banking interfaces vary wildly depending on which institution you’re using. For instance, over at Zappos, you might find yourself having to manually type in a recipient's name if the system doesn't automatically pull it from the database, whereas at JPMorgan Chase, that isn't even an option.
I honestly have no idea how they get away with that level of manual input given the federal regulations currently in place: which clearly outline the required elements for payment orders.

Yeah, I was actually thinking about Bank of America because that's the one I use for my online banking.
I had no idea Zaba even allowed that. 🤷
Domestic transfers and payments in USD in Banking, Insurance & Loans ·
Michael Perez83 said:I’ll just point out that anyone with even a passing familiarity with finance will recognize those account prefixes immediately. For instance, if you see an account number starting with 31 or 32—say, 236000-3225678905—it’s clear we're looking at a personal checking or savings account, not some institutional fund for an association or non-profit (which I noticed was mentioned regarding memberships).
Furthermore, when you're processing a payment, you are absolutely required to include the recipient's full legal name and their mailing address on the payment order.

Unless you're doing everything through online banking, where you don't really have a place to plug that in... and honestly, I'm just hoping I understood what he was saying about how to pay correctly. 🤷
Domestic transfers and payments in USD in Banking, Insurance & Loans ·
Jerry Sullivan4 said:Aha, so the payment finally hit my account today.. The woman at the teller window asked for more than just my name and address.

And it didn't even show up on my Chase statement until the following day.

That's all there is to it. Thanks a lot...

Seriously, thanks again! 👍
Domestic transfers and payments in USD in Banking, Insurance & Loans ·
Jerry Sullivan4 said:Thanks for the helpful reply. I'm asking because I want to have people sending specific amounts to my account, and I'd rather they didn't all have to enter my full legal name in the "recipient" field when they make a transfer.

🙏 Thanks so much, Ronald Allen... I'm going to try running a test transfer to myself and I'll let you know if it works... 🤣

Just one more thing... does the transaction show up immediately, or does it take until tomorrow?

No problem at all! 👍

It really depends on who's paying and how they're doing it.
If they're using online banking, they won't actually "find" your name automatically; they just have to manually type it in when they set up the transfer.

And timing-wise, if they're using the same bank as you, it should hit your account within a few minutes. If they're transferring from a different bank and do it in the morning (before 2 PM), it should land the same day. Anything after that usually hits the next business day.
I guess this logic applies even faster if they're using Chase, since those digital transfers clear much quicker.