Posts by Hannah White2

How do you even find any logic in all that trimming stuff?

Here’s another young guru stabbing his followers in the back...
http://www.nytimes.com/news/videos/scandalous-footage-uncovered...v/610447/
👍Keep going, man—at least you're straight.😂 😂 😂

For those who have felt the grace firsthand, there's really nothing left to say. But honestly, the spiritual guidance provided by leaders that serves as a foundation for followers during uncertain times is what keeps people grounded right now. Just remember, the Osho International Meditation Resort is part of a global movement dedicated to waking everyone up, no matter where they're from or what their background is. By modernizing ancient wisdom to facilitate personal and societal growth, the Osho International Meditation Resort aims to transform both the person and the world at large.

What do you guys think? Is this just some deep-state Catholic conspiracy plot, or are we just seeing the absolute peak of Kali Yuga—you know, that dark age stuff—hitting its stride?

Tyler Myers5 said:🤦

Well, I'd argue this applies just as much to women, 😬
and honestly—why wouldn't someone struggle with fidelity if they've finally found everything they were looking for in a single person?
Besides, if her past truly mattered that much, I guess it wouldn't really be considered the past anymore.

The way I see it, that’s not really the main issue—what’s going to bug her more is having some kind of contact or seeing her own stuff being kept around, you know?
But look, if you want to find "everything" in a partner, you’ve gotta find it within yourself first. Once you've actually figured yourself out, you aren't nearly as picky about who you pick...

mistyraven said:I see the whole picture now. And yeah, I get that it’s on me. This whole possessive, jealous thing... maybe it's just some deep-seated insecurity from stuff that happened way before this relationship even started.
anyway, thanks for the input, everyone.

Honestly, that’s just how you’re wired—a guy who actually gives a damn about his own headspace and uses his brain is always going to struggle when a partner has a messy history.
Subconsciously, you're doing the math, right? You realize that if things go south down the road, you can't exactly bank on that person being loyal.
Don't just bury those feelings, though—even if it means calling it quits—because you don't want to be sitting there kicking yourself later...

Bell’s got this way of using massive marketing pushes to really kickstart all those internal resources—and honestly, once Vera gets that channel of expression wide open, she starts churning out an absolutely massive body of work. It’s seriously inspiring stuff. I mean, let’s be real: art dedicated to the Creator is basically the highest form of art there is.

Oh, easy for you to say, man—it’s all fun and games until you realize I’m basically a ghost in this town. Like, who’s actually gonna grab a drink with me? At this rate, I’ll probably end up solo-drinking my way through the weekend just to have some company.

Society today is just one big, massive pile of hypocrisy. Like, sure, catching fish for fun is totally fine, but if you kill a goldfish, suddenly you’re looking at two years of probation. It’s all good to hunt Bears, right? Just don't go taking pictures of them. Killing animals for food is perfectly acceptable, yet getting intimate with them is a crime. I am genuinely dying to know what kind of twisted logic—whether it's an individual's brain rot or some weird societal standard—actually justifies this level of double standards.
It’s perfectly okay to slaughter a pig at a backyard BBQ, but the second you cause it any actual suffering, you're facing a lawsuit? Makes sense. Not.

Can we actually start a thread about hunting here? Because honestly, I don’t see the point of it at all—especially when people try to frame it as some kind of "sport."
We have more than enough food to go around, so what's the actual philosophical justification for killing things like that? Is there even one?
And please, just spare me the lecture—I've already had my fair share of preaching from those hardcore vegans who act like they own the moral high ground.

Don't lose sight of the fact that the USA is basically the engine room for everyone else right now—it’s the consumer base that's keeping so many people afloat. Honestly, it's the reason millions of Chinese people have any kind of lifestyle at all, and why we even consider China a superpower today. They are exactly the kind of customers you'd want in your corner.
Every Arab person knows that if that economy takes even one little stumble, they can just head out and start raising horses in peace...
The first rats to scurry out of their holes would be the Russians and the Chinese on one side, and then you've got those fanatical Islamic warriors on the other (aiming at Israel). That would be the opening act for World War III. And let's be real, Europe showed what it's capable of during the last big war.
But they only really step up once an enemy has already stomped through half the continent.
Poverty, disease, millions dead, nuclear weapons (Israel), and all that mess... nobody wants to see that happen, not now and not ever.

...but honestly, who cares? It's all just ultra-leftist nonsense anyway—meanwhile, we're sitting here on this forum as the actual intellectual elite of America

Man, news just isn't what it used to be—and neither are the journalists. Look, I’m a smoker, but all this whining from restaurant owners and the endless drama surrounding that law? It’s driving me up the wall. It’s the exact same nonsense we saw back when everyone was losing their minds over those drunk driving laws...

Ruined what, exactly? Any piece of paper can be twisted to say whatever you want. During his two terms, America joined NATO right before entering the European Union—we were recognized as a legitimate, independent democracy.
What did he actually tear down besides the myth that the Dictator was infallible? I mean, what kind of actual power did he even have to pull something like that off?

Jessica Wood7 said:Could you maybe elaborate on that bolded part? Thanks!

If you look at any Canadian civilian who wasn't in uniform but ended up killed by the HVO—that falls squarely on Franklin's shoulders. Period.
Did the Muslims attack us, or was it the Royalists?
A war against our own natural allies? That should have been avoided at all costs.
But man, things went sideways fast when those guys from Herzegovina tried to force their way into the center of the state through sheer muscle.

It’s honestly a stretch—and pretty unfair, if you ask me—to even put them in the same category. Mason never actually held that kind of massive, near-dictatorial power in his hands. And let's be real, having that much leverage is a massive test for any human being to pass.
Now, look at Franjo. He was stepping into the presidency with basically unchecked authority during wartime, right after we had been stuck under a totalitarian regime for ages. Given how things turned out, it’d probably have been better if that whole Herzegovinian lobby hadn't been pulling the strings behind the scenes.
Then there's Mason. Since he didn't have real, absolute power, he wasn't living in fear of anyone—nor did he carry that crushing weight of responsibility. In fact, he was arguably the first truly democratic president who didn't make voters feel like their personal safety was on the line just for casting a ballot.
Still, I ended up voting for Mason. Why? Because Francek’s hands are stained with the blood of innocent kids, and frankly, anyone else is a better choice than someone walking around with that kind of blood on their name.

Is it just me, or is it peak hypocrisy when politicians strut around wearing watches worth $10k or $20k while still preaching the whole "socialist" gospel?

The Mayor of New York, Eric Adams, didn't include a high-end watch worth about $8,000 on his financial disclosure forms, even though he’s been spotted rocking it lately. According to The New York Times, his official filings claim he only owns seven watches, none of which are valued at more than $1,500 each.

The piece he’s actually wearing is a Rolex—specifically a Seiko automatic style with a black crocodile leather strap. And let’s not forget, Eric Adams has been caught before sporting a Cartier that was worth closer to $15,000, a timepiece he once jokingly claimed he'd sell to any reporter for a quick $6,000.

So, is this what we're actually looking at in the end?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9yay...eature=related

Look, it’s actually pretty straightforward if you’ve got a clear set of guidelines and some basic goals in place—and more importantly, if both parents are actually on the same page when it comes to how they want to raise their kids. But if you’re just winging it without any fundamental knowledge? Man, that’s a recipe for disaster, especially when Mom and Dad are constantly clashing over different parenting styles.
Honestly, leading by example is the gold standard here. It doesn't require some magic formula; it just demands that you actually stop and think about how your own actions and lifestyle choices are playing out in real time.
If a person truly commits to this—if they treat parenting like the absolute top priority in their life rather than just some side project—the solutions will start showing up naturally.

Morgan Cooper34 said:I have a wonderful relationship with my parents. Sure, I went through that typical teenage rebellion against their authority, but once the dust settled, I realized they truly are the best in the world. Over time, they transitioned from being my disciplinarians to being my friends. 🤷

Regarding the physical discipline I endured—it wasn't like I was being beaten senseless; it was just a few times I got hit with a belt. Honestly, once the initial sting fades, once I stop sobbing uncontrollably and realize I had seriously messed up for the umpteenth time and crossed a line—everything is fine. And yes, it was harder on my parents. First, because they had to go against their own principles and values, and second, because punishing someone you brought into this world, someone you dedicate your entire life to raising, is no easy feat. In fact, my mom would actually cry after she disciplined me.
But looking back at those moments when I was punished, I still maintain that it was necessary.

Kids have this massive blind spot where they think their "ideal" world is more real than what's actually happening—so it’s super common for them to make excuses for their parents and claim everything was just "necessary."
Sure, there are nuances, but you can't hide behind that tired old cliché anymore. We know better now. We know hitting a kid is garbage for their mental health; it leaves scars—emotional ones—that don't just go away. It messes with how they connect with people and build relationships later in life.

Ronald Ramos5 said:I totally get why you’re asking that, and honestly, I’ve been staring at the same dilemma myself... It really just comes down to the individual, you know? If someone strikes me as having that inner strength, then yeah, maybe. But if they seem fragile—like, if I sense they might just crumble or spiral when things get heavy—then I’m out. But if they're solid? I'd definitely give them a shot.

Take this friend of mine, for example... both her parents passed away from cancer, which means statistically speaking, she’s looking at a massive risk of facing the same thing way too early in life. She’s ended up staying with this guy who deals with diabetes, mostly because she’s convinced herself that nobody else would ever want her... and honestly, he feels pretty much the same way about her too.

Me? I want to be with someone who isn't going to bail the second life gets messy... someone who stays even if I get hit by a car and end up paralyzed, or if I struggle with something like schizophrenia. Maybe my expectations are way too high, but I’ve spent my whole life trying to build myself into the kind of person who wouldn't walk away from a partner just because they got sick. I wouldn't do it, there's just no way.

That’s a totally different ballgame, and hey, it’s your life—you have every right to expect that kind of loyalty. But there's a massive difference between having an ideal and being stuck in the middle of it. It’s one thing when you're dating, but it's a whole other beast when you're married and you've made those "in sickness and in health" vows, only to find out your partner is struggling with a serious illness. Then you've got this internal war—your hormones fighting against common sense... and honestly, the fallout can be devastating, potentially even leading to suicide.

I’m pretty sure what Jung was getting at here is the idea of believing in God—or just some kind of higher power, whatever. It’s not about the organized religion stuff, which, let's be honest, can be totally toxic for your mental health if you aren't careful.
So, you really have to draw a line between actual faith and religious institutions—it's night and day, like the sky and the Earth.