neonfox12 said:What you’re talking about isn't some kind of violation at all. You're basically trivializing my point here.
Since your take is just a snap judgment, don't lecture me.
neonfox12 said:It’s not about deleting posts; it's about how deleting them twists someone's actual stance and denies them the chance to explain themselves. Maybe there hasn't been a precedent for this yet, but the fact is, this happens on Reddit all the time. We didn't see this kind of thing in other media ten years ago, but nowadays we're constantly hearing denials and retractions. The rule of law is slowly moving forward.
There’s no precedent because if what you’re saying were actually true, anyone could sue over every single deleted comment. That's just not how things work. Generally speaking, the burden of proof lies with whoever claims their rights were violated by a deleted post. If that were the case, forums would be shutting down left and right, and unless a forum is a massive collection of hate speech or illegal content, nothing really happens.
neonfox12 said:I want to make sure fellow users know that if they feel wronged based on those criteria, they are free to file a report with the appropriate agency. By law, an agency has to act on every report. Reddit would then be required to provide an explanation for every single one. A little extra paperwork usually motivates people to change.🙂
Actually, no, they won't act, because that would mean they'd have to respond every time someone gets a post removed. In the end, the answer will just be: "If you don't like the forum or the people running it, you don't have to participate." Good luck with the filings. 🙂