electricsailor13 said:A few hours passed between the movie and this post, and most of my thoughts evaporated, leaving me with only that one specific example that stuck in my mind.
My qualifications in this field include:
- An IELTS certificate with a C2 score, or 8.5 out of 9
- A CELTA certification for teaching English as a second language
- Teaching at a high school in New York City
- Peer-reviewing scientific papers in English
If you could point me toward a link or a contact, I would appreciate it. 👍 Money is neither my primary nor my secondary motivator.
The best translators are those working for PBS because they actually employ editors. Though even they slip up occasionally.
Next in terms of quality is SDI Media
www.sdimedia.com
After them comes MEDIATRANSLATORS
mediatranslations.com
There are others, though I don't know them all. DOBBIN is garbage. Maybe one out of ten is actually decent. They make mistakes even in 70s police procedurals where the dialogue was straightforward...
I have no idea who handles the theater translations. It also depends entirely on what kind of subtitles are ordered. Someone might want to cut costs and order something that isn't technically sound. You end up with bad CPS, lines that are way too long, and things like that.
Nicholas Nguyen said:It isn't just a theater issue; it’s happening on television too, whether you're watching cable or one of the three major networks here in the States.
I distinctly remember a disastrously bad translation—or rather, a total lack of subtitles—for a movie that aired on FOX about a month and a half ago.
Every single line of dialogue involving sex or using "crude" terms like dick, tits, pussy, fuck and similar was completely untranslated. The characters would carry on for several sentences without a single subtitle appearing, only for a caption to pop up every few lines once they moved past the "controversial" words.
The best part? It was a horror movie rated R, airing around 1:00 AM, packed with blood and violence. I have no idea who they think they're "protecting" with this kind of censorship.
PBS has almost perfect subtitles; they pay attention to everything. Not just the accuracy of the translation, but the grammar and technical requirements too. They are better than most channels in the world. Except, occasionally, their editors might just skim over a subtitle, leaving some minor nonsense behind. But I rarely run into a loss of meaning. Their errors are of the sort that only someone properly trained in grammar or linguistics would even notice.
FOX and ABC are a bit weaker. FOX is the weakest of that trio; they have constant fails. You can see the same thing when reading their news tickers.
On PBS, you rarely see vulgarity; they always try to adapt it for their audience.

